| Literature DB >> 24204736 |
Yiu-fai Cheung1, Wei Yu, Daniel Ka-leung Cheuk, Frankie Wai-tsoi Cheng, Janet Yee-kwan Yang, Jeffrey Ping-wa Yau, Karin Ka-huen Ho, Chi-kong Li, Rever Chak-ho Li, Hui-Leung Yuen, Alvin Siu-cheung Ling, Vivian Wing-yi Li, Wai-keung Wong, Kwong-cheong Tsang, Godfrey Chi-fung Chan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to quantify plasma high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) levels, their determinants, and their associations with left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation in adult survivors of childhood acute leukaemias. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24204736 PMCID: PMC3804508 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparisons of demographic and echocardiographic findings between survivors and control subjects.
| Patients | Controls | p | |
| (n = 100) | (n = 42) | ||
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 24.1±4.2 | 25.4±4.1 | 0.10 |
| Sex (M:F) | 57∶43 | 26∶16 | 0.82 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.7±12.1 | 64.1±11.3 | 0.046 |
| Height (cm) | 164.5±8.8 | 170.1±7.6 | <0.001 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.6±0.2 | 1.7±0.2 | 0.006 |
|
| |||
| Indexed LVEDd (mm) | 29.7±3.6 | 30.4±3.0 | 0.31 |
| Indexed LVESd (mm) | 20.5±2.6 | 20.0±2.2 | 0.30 |
| FS (%) | 31.1±3.8 | 33.9±3.6 | <0.001 |
| Indexed LV mass (g/m2) | 66.9±16.9 | 69.3±18.6 | 0.45 |
|
| |||
| LV end-systolic volume (ml/m2) | 32.7±9.2 | 27.9±6.8 | 0.003 |
| LV end- diastolic volume (ml/m2) | 70.1±16.7 | 63.7±13.2 | 0.032 |
| LV EF (%) | 53.2±7.2 | 56.0±7.4 | 0.042 |
|
| |||
| E (cm/s) | 88.0±17.1 | 84.3±15.3 | 0.24 |
| A (cm/s) | 48.7±12.6 | 45.5±11.4 | 0.18 |
| E/A ratio | 1.9±0.6 | 2.0±0.5 | 0.82 |
| E deceleration time (ms) | 172.7±34.6 | 163.4±32.3 | 0.15 |
| s (cm/s) | 8.2±1.9 | 8.4±1.9 | 0.66 |
| e (cm/s) | −12.0±2.0 | −11.8±2.4 | 0.62 |
| a (cm/s) | −5.1±1.8 | −4.8±1.6 | 0.18 |
| e/a | 2.7±1.1 | 2.7±1.2 | 0.97 |
| IVA (m/s2) | 1.19±0.49 | 1.27±0.63 | 0.42 |
|
| |||
| Longitudinal strain (%) | −16.0±3.1 | 17.1±3.2 | 0.049 |
| Longitudinal SRs(/s) | −0.93±0.18 | −0.94±0.20 | 0.68 |
| Longitudinal SRd(/s) | 1.28±0.32 | 1.34±0.32 | 0.30 |
| Circumferential strain (%) | −14.3±3.5 | −16.6±4.7 | 0.001 |
| Circumferential SRs(/s) | −0.94±0.24 | −1.06±0.33 | 0.027 |
| Circumferential SRd(/s) | 1.12±0.39 | 1.27±0.45 | 0.049 |
| Radial strain (%) | 32.9±10.9 | 42.3±12.5 | <0.001 |
| Radial SRs(/s) | 1.90±0.49 | 2.14±0.57 | 0.003 |
| Radial SRd(/s) | −1.88±0.67 | −1.99±0.67 | 0.36 |
Abbreviations: A, peak mitral inflow velocity at late diastole; a, mitral annular late diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; E, peak mitral inflow velocity at early diastole; e, mitral annual early diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; IVA, isovolumic acceleration; LV, left ventricular; LVEDd, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVESd, left ventricular end systolic dimension; SRd, early diastolic strain rate; SRs, systolic strain rate.
statistically significant.
Figure 1Levels of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in survivors and controls by genders.
Distributions of hs-cTnT in (a) male and (b) female survivors and controls are shown using scatter plots. Dashed lines represent 95th percentile in controls.
Comparisons of demographic factors, clinical variables, and genotypic frequencies between survivors with (group I) and without (group II) elevated hs-cTnT levels.
| Group I | Group II | p | |
| (n = 19) | (n = 81) | ||
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 24.7±3.7 | 24.0±4.3 | 0.52 |
| Sex (M:F) | 13∶6 | 44∶37 | 0.31 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.8±11.6 | 59.6±12.3 | 0.97 |
| Height (cm) | 166.4±7.7 | 164.0±9.0 | 0.28 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.7±0.2 | 1.6±0.2 | 0.66 |
|
| |||
| ALL:AML | 15∶4 | 73∶8 | 0.23 |
| Cumulative doxorubicindose (mg/m2) | 288±126 | 201±83 | <0.001 |
| Irradiation involvingthe heart (Y:N) | 6∶13 | 7∶74 | 0.016 |
| Relapse (Y:N) | 8∶11 | 15∶66 | 0.037 |
| Stem cell transplant (Y:N) | 6∶13 | 9∶72 | 0.036 |
|
| |||
|
| 14∶5 | 72∶9 | 0.13 |
|
| 15∶4 | 62∶19 | 1.0 |
|
| 10.9 | 47∶34 | 0.80 |
Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
statistically significant.
Genotypic and allelic frequencies of NAD(P)H oxidase and multidrug resistance protein genes in survivors and control subjects, and genotypic frequencies reported in Chinese population from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
| Genotypes | Patients | Controls | OR(95% CI) | p | NCBI |
| (n = 100) | (n = 38 | database | |||
|
| 1.64(0.63–4.29)a | 0.31 | |||
| CC | 86 (86.0%) | 30 (78.9%) | 86% | ||
| CT | 13 (13.0%) | 8 (21.1%) | 14% | ||
| TT | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0% | ||
|
| 1.36(0.59–3.17)b | 0.51 | |||
| TT | 77 (77.0%) | 27 (71.1%) | 86.7% | ||
| AT | 21 (21.0%) | 11 (28.9%) | 13.3% | ||
| AA | 2 (2.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0% | ||
|
| 2.27(1.05–4.90)c | 0.038 | |||
| GG | 15 (15.0%) | 2 (5.2%) | 9.3% | ||
| AG | 42 (42.0%) | 12 (31.6%) | 34.9% | ||
| AA | 43 (43.0%) | 24 (63.2%) | 55.6% | ||
|
| − | − | |||
| GG | 100 (100%) | 38 (100%) | |||
| GT | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| TT | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
|
| − | − | |||
| TT | 100 (100%) | 38 (100%) | |||
| TA | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| AA | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
|
| − | − | |||
| GG | 100 (100%) | 38 (100%) | 100% | ||
| GA | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0% | ||
| AA | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 1.45(0.59–358) | 0.47 | |||
| C | 185 | 68 | |||
| T | 15 | 8 | |||
|
| 1.19(0.55–2.54) | 0.69 | |||
| T | 175 | 65 | |||
| A | 25 | 11 | |||
|
| 2.11(1.13–3.93) | 0.02 | |||
| G | 72 | 16 | |||
| A | 128 | 60 | |||
|
| – | – | |||
| G | 200 | 76 | |||
| T | 0 | 0 | |||
|
| – | – | |||
| T | 200 | 76 | |||
| A | 0 | 0 | |||
|
| – | – | |||
| G | 200 | 76 | |||
| A | 0 | 0 |
statistically significant.
4 controls who were siblings of patients were excluded.
CC vs CT/TT.
TT vs AT/AA.
GG/AG vs AA.
Figure 2Levels of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in survivors by NAD(P)H oxidase and multidrug resistance protein polymorphisms.
Scatter plots showing distributions of hs-cTnT levels in relation to (a) CYBA, (b) RAC2, and (c) NCF4 polymorphisms. Solid lines represent median hs-cTnT levels.
Comparisons of echocardiographic findings between survivors with (group I) and without (group II) elevated hs-cTnT levels.
| Group I | Group II | p | |
| (n = 19) | (n = 81) | ||
|
| |||
| Indexed LVEDd (mm) | 30.4±3.8 | 29.5±3.6 | 0.33 |
| Indexed LVESd (mm) | 20.6±3.0 | 20.5±2.5 | 0.83 |
| FS (%) | 32.0±3.1 | 30.9±4.0 | 0.24 |
| Indexed LV mass (g/m2) | 76.0±23.4 | 64.6±14.3 | 0.008 |
|
| |||
| LV end-systolic volume(ml/m2) | 34.5±11.4 | 32.3±8.6 | 0.37 |
| LV end- diastolic volume(ml/m2) | 71.0±18.1 | 69.9±16.4 | 0.81 |
| LV EF (%) | 51.3±6.6 | 53.7±7.3 | 0.19 |
|
| |||
| E (cm/s) | 86.4±15.4 | 88.4±17.5 | 0.65 |
| A (cm/s) | 51.2±12.1 | 48.0±12.7 | 0.32 |
| E/A ratio | 1.8±0.6 | 2.0±0.6 | 0.30 |
| E deceleration time (ms) | 171.6±38.4 | 172.9±33.9 | 0.88 |
| s (cm/s) | 7.4±1.8 | 8.4±1.8 | 0.041 |
| e (cm/s) | −11.2±2.5 | −12.2±1.8 | 0.045 |
| a (cm/s) | −4.4±1.6 | −5.3±1.8 | 0.052 |
| e/a | 2.8±1.0 | 2.7±1.2 | 0.57 |
| IVA (m/s2) | 0.92±0.37 | 1.26±0.50 | 0.007 |
|
| |||
| Longitudinal strain (%) | −15.2±2.5 | −16.2±3.2 | 0.19 |
| Longitudinal SRs (/s) | −0.86±0.14 | −0.95±0.18 | 0.049 |
| Longitudinal SRd (/s) | 1.24±0.33 | 1.29±0.32 | 0.59 |
| Circumferential strain (%) | −14.2±3.7 | −14.3±3.5 | 0.90 |
| Circumferential SRs (/s) | −0.93±0.23 | −0.95±0.24 | 0.74 |
| Circumferential SRd (/s) | 1.08±0.27 | 1.13±0.41 | 0.62 |
| Radial strain (%) | 32.2±7.2 | 33.0±11.7 | 0.79 |
| Radial SRs (/s) | 1.74±0.39 | 1.88±0.51 | 0.26 |
| Radial SRd (/s) | −1.96±0.90 | −1.86±0.61 | 0.53 |
Abbreviations: A, peak mitral inflow velocity at late diastole; a, mitral annular late diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; E, peak mitral inflow velocity at early diastole; e, mitral annual early diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; IVA, isovolumic acceleration; LV, left ventricular; LVEDd, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVESd, left ventricular end systolic dimension; SRd, early diastolic strain rate; SRs, systolic strain rate.
statistically significant.
Figure 3Relationships between high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and indices of left ventricular (LV) deformation.
Correlations between hs-cTnT and LV (a) global longitudinal systolic strain, (b) systolic strain rate, and (c) diastolic strain rate are shown. Solid lines represent the best-fit linear regression and dashed lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each parameter of the regression line.