Literature DB >> 24204071

The effect of an automated clinical reminder on weight loss in primary care.

Jason S O'Grady1, Tom D Thacher, Rajeev Chaudhry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obese individuals have increased health risks. Clinical reminders positively affect health outcomes in diabetes and osteoporosis, but the effect of automated prompts on weight loss in obesity has not been studied. Our objective was to determine whether an automatic prompt for the clinician to recommend lifestyle changes to patients with a body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m(2) led to greater weight loss over a 3- to 6-month interval compared with the absence of a clinical reminder.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of obese adult patients with a BMI >25 kg/m(2) who were seen in 2009 and 2010, before and after implementation of an automated printed clinical reminder, respectively. We evaluated 1600 patients in each of the control and intervention groups. The primary outcome was the mean change in BMI between the control and intervention groups. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the effect of the clinical reminder on the change in BMI while adjusting for baseline BMI and potential confounding factors.
RESULTS: The reduction in BMI (mean ± standard deviation) in the group with the clinical reminder (-0.084 ± 1.56 kg/m(2)) was not significantly greater than the control group (-0.053 ± 1.49 kg/m(2); P = .56). A regression model incorporating the clinical reminder, age, baseline BMI, obesity diagnosis, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia found that baseline BMI (P < .001), obesity diagnosis (P < .001), age (P = .001), and hyperlipidemia diagnosis (P = .02) were significant predictors of weight loss, but the clinical reminder was not (P = .78). There was a significant interaction between the clinical reminder and baseline BMI (P = .005), as the prompt increased weight loss more in those with lower baseline BMI.
CONCLUSION: Automated clinical reminders alone do not improve weight loss in overweight and obese patients. Physician diagnoses of obesity or hyperlipidemia were associated with weight loss, suggesting that formally noting these diagnoses contributes to successful weight loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Medical Records; Obesity; Practice Management

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24204071     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.06.120340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  5 in total

1.  Health behaviors and quality of life predictors for risk of hospitalization in an electronic health record-linked biobank.

Authors:  Paul Y Takahashi; Euijung Ryu; Janet E Olson; Erin M Winkler; Matthew A Hathcock; Ruchi Gupta; Jeff A Sloan; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2015-08-11

2.  Relative validity and reliability of a diet risk score (DRS) for clinical practice.

Authors:  Emily A Johnston; Kristina S Petersen; Jeannette M Beasley; Tobias Krussig; Diane C Mitchell; Linda V Van Horn; Rick Weiss; Penny M Kris-Etherton
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2020-10-08

3.  Big data analytics for preventive medicine.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran Razzak; Muhammad Imran; Guandong Xu
Journal:  Neural Comput Appl       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 5.102

Review 4.  Role of the family doctor in the management of adults with obesity: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sturgiss; Nicholas Elmitt; Emily Haesler; Chris van Weel; Kirsty A Douglas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  What works and why in the identification and referral of adults with comorbid obesity in primary care: A realist review.

Authors:  David N Blane; Sara Macdonald; Catherine A O'Donnell
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 9.213

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.