Literature DB >> 24203845

Periprocedural hemodynamic depression is associated with a higher number of new ischemic brain lesions after stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study-MRI Substudy.

Aysun Altinbas1, Ale Algra, Leo H Bonati, Martin M Brown, L Jaap Kappelle, Gert Jan de Borst, Jeroen Hendrikse, Ingeborg van der Tweel, H Bart van der Worp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is associated with a higher risk of both hemodynamic depression and new ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging than carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We assessed whether the occurrence of hemodynamic depression is associated with these lesions in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated by CAS or CEA in the randomized International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)-MRI substudy.
METHODS: The number and total volume of new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging 1 to 3 days after CAS or CEA was measured in the ICSS-MRI substudy. Hemodynamic depression was defined as periprocedural bradycardia, asystole, or hypotension requiring treatment. The number of new ischemic lesions was the primary outcome measure. We calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals per treatment with Poisson regression comparing the number of lesions in patients with or without hemodynamic depression.
RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were included (122 allocated CAS; 107 CEA). After CAS, patients with hemodynamic depression had a mean of 13 new diffusion-weighted imaging lesions, compared with a mean of 4 in those without hemodynamic depression (risk ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-6.50). The number of lesions after CEA was too small for reliable analysis. Lesion volumes did not differ between patients with or without hemodynamic depression.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated by CAS, periprocedural hemodynamic depression is associated with an excess of new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. The findings support the hypothesis that hypoperfusion increases the susceptibility of the brain to embolism. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty; bradycardia; carotid stenosis; endarterectomy, carotid; hypotension; stents

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24203845     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  14 in total

Review 1.  Carotid Disease Management: Surgery, Stenting, or Medication.

Authors:  Priyank Khandelwal; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Safety of simultaneous bilateral carotid artery stenting for bilateral carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Jumpei Oshita; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Takahito Okazaki; Daizo Ishii; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Anatomical risk factors for ischemic lesions associated with carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Go Ikeda; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Masanari Shiigai; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Hideo Tsurushima; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 4.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  The Prevalence and Factors Contributing to Hemodynamic Depression in Patients Undergoing Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Safoora Kokabi; Samaneh Yousefi; Mehrdad Emami; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Kaveh Kashani; Majid Panahandeh; Seyed Moslem Heidari-Khormizi; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-10

6.  Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Traenka; Stefan T Engelter; Martin M Brown; Joanna Dobson; Chris Frost; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-01-15

7.  Mechanism of Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting Within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) Randomised Trial.

Authors:  A Huibers; D Calvet; F Kennedy; K R Czuriga-Kovács; R L Featherstone; F L Moll; M M Brown; T Richards; G J de Borst
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Complications and Predictors of Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Masataka Nanto; Yudai Goto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Seisuke Tanigawa; Hayato Takeuchi; Yoshikazu Nakahara; Hiroshi Tenjin; Michiko Takado
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  The correlation between the cardiovascular instability and the size of the developed ischaemic lesions in patients who underwent carotid stenting.

Authors:  Sándor Csizmadia; Zsófia Kaszás; Róbert Klucsai; Éva Bartha; Erika Vörös
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-01-21

10.  Comparison of Best Medical Management with Carotid Intervention Procedures in the Prevention of Stroke Recurrence in Patients with Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  B V Deepa Rani; Sandeep Gampa; Deepika Sirineni; K R Harshavardhana; Satya Rama Krishna; Subhash Kaul
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.