Literature DB >> 24203830

Memory for general and specific sentences.

S J Thios1.   

Abstract

Cued recall indicated that memory was better for sentences containing specific verbs (e.g., scratched) than for sentences containing general verbs (e.g., injured). When synonymic verb responses were included, however, the general-specific difference was eliminated. Also, for complete sentence recall, subject nouns were better retrieval cues than verbs or object nouns. nt]mis|This research was supported by National Science Foundation Research Grant GB-22664 to L. Starling Reid and by a grant to the author from the Denison University Faculty Development Activities Program. Thanks are due Bill Stehle and Larry Giordano, who assisted in data collection and analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 24203830     DOI: 10.3758/BF03198213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  2 in total

1.  Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences.

Authors:  H H Clark; E V Clark
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Memory for gist: some relevant variables.

Authors:  S Fillenbaum
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1966 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Semantic context influences memory for verbs more than memory for nouns.

Authors:  Alan W Kersten; Julie L Earles
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Recognition memory for elements of sentences.

Authors:  A G Reynolds; P W Flagg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.