Literature DB >> 24203740

The effect of set on encoding and rehearsal processes in memory.

R A Monty1, R Karsh, H A Taub.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of manipulating S's preparation for what he will see on a given trial on his ability to mentally keep track of the number of occurrences of each of several different stimuli in a sequence. It was found that, when the same stimuli were used from trial to trial, performance was significantly better than when different stimuli were used. Foreknowledge of the specific stimuli to be used on a given trial did little to improve performance per se, but it did reduce labeling errors. The results were discussed in terms of the "spatial window" model of keeping-track performance.

Year:  1974        PMID: 24203740     DOI: 10.3758/BF03198141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  KEEPING TRACK OF SEQUENTIAL EVENTS: EFFECTS OF RATE, CATEGORIES, AND TRIAL LENGTH.

Authors:  R A MONTY; H A TAUB; K R LAUGHERY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-03

2.  Imagery and interference in sequential short-term memory.

Authors:  R A Monty; R Karsh; H A Taub
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1973-06

3.  Spatial encoding strategies in sequential short-term memory.

Authors:  R A Monty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

Review 4.  Nature of the effect of set on perception.

Authors:  R N Haber
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 8.934

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.