Literature DB >> 24203694

Clinical practice guidelines: Opportunities and implications.

M Edmunds1.   

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines have been defined as systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They are intended to improve the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of care. While particular guidelines may be challenged on the grounds that they are not inclusive of all effective treatment strategies or are too difficult or too expensive to implement, there is evidence that guidelines can influence clinical decision-making in ways that improve treatment outcomes and sometimes also in ways that reduce costs. Guidelines are viewed by policymakers as an important factor in rational decision-making about payment practices and other policy issues, but they can provoke controversies among providers and researchers.This article gives a broad overview of practice guidelines from a health policy perspective. Strategies for guideline development are described, with a focus on guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, the U.S. Clinical Preventive Services Task Force, and managed care organizations. Issues related to implementation of guidelines are discussed, including the need to reach agreement on the standards of evidence for clinical effectiveness. Strategies are discussed for increasing the application of behavioral research findings for multicomponent treatment and population-based preventive interventions.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24203694     DOI: 10.1007/BF02909584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  27 in total

1.  Reins or fences: a physician's view of cost containment.

Authors:  K Grumbach; T Bodenheimer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Competition and regulation.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  HMOs and the quality of care.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Standards of care in medicine.

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysis.

Authors:  R H Miller; H S Luft
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Financing and payment reform for primary health care and substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  R Kunnes; R Niven; T Gustafson; N Brooks; S M Levin; M Edmunds; J G Trumble; M J Coye
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  1993

8.  Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; N N Dubler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Estimating health expenditure growth under managed competition. Science, simulations, and scenarios.

Authors:  R H Miller; H S Luft
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Advancing America's health.

Authors:  P R Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.