Literature DB >> 24203430

The distonic ion (·)CH 2CH 2CH (+)OH, keto ion CH 3CH 2CH=O (+·), enol ion CH 3CH=CHOH (+·), and related C 3H 6O (+·) radical cations. Stabilities and isomerization proclivities studied by dissociation and neutralization-reionization.

M J Polce1, C Wesdemiotis.   

Abstract

Metastable ion decompositions, collision-activated dissociation (CAD), and neutralization-reionization mass spectrometry are utilized to study the unimolecular chemistry of distonic ion (·)CH2CH2CH(-)OH (2(+·)) and its enol-keto tautomers CH3CH=CHOH(-·) (1 (+·)) and CH3CH2CH=O (+·) (3(+·)). The major fragmentation of metastable 1(+·)-3(+·) is H(·) loss to yield the propanoyl cation, CH3CH2C≡O(+). This reaction remains dominant upon collisional activation, although now some isomeric CH2=CH-CH(+) OH is coproduced from all three precursors. The CAD and neutralization-reionization ((+)NR(+)) spectra of keto ion 3 (+·) are substantially different from those of tautomers 2(+·) and 1(+·). Hence, 3(+·) without sufficient energy for decomposition (i. e. , "stable" 3(+·)) does not isomerize to the ther-modynamically more stable ions 2(+·) or 1(+·), and the 1,4-H rearrangement H-CH2CH2CH=O(+·)(3 (+·)) → CH2CH2CH(+) O-H (2 (+·)) must require an appreciable critical energy. Although the fragment ion abundances in the (+) NR (+) (and CAD) spectra of 1 (+·) and 2 (+·) are similar, the relative and absolute intensities of the survivor ions (recovered C3H6O(+·) ions in the (+)NR(+) spectra) are markedly distinct and independent of the internal energy of 1 (+·) and 2 (+·). Furthermore, 1 (+·) and 2 (+·) show different MI spectra. Based on these data, distonic ion 2 (+·) does not spontaneously rearrange to enol ion 1 (+·) (which is the most stable C3H6O(+·) of CCCO connectivity) and, therefore, is separated from it by an appreciable barrier. In contrast, the molecular ions of cyclopropanol (4 (+·)) and allyl alcohol (5 (+·)) isomerize readily to 2 (+·), via ring opening and 1,2-H(-) shift, respectively. The sample found to generate the purest 2 (+·) is α-hydroxy-γ-butyrolactone. Several other precursors that would yield 2 (+·) by a least-motion reaction cogenerate detectable quantities of enol ion 1 (+·), or the enol ion of acetone (CH2=C(CH3)OH(+·), 6 (+·)), or methyl vinyl ether ion (CH3OCH=CH 2 (+·) , 7 (+·)). Ion 6 (+·) is coproduced from samples that contain the -CH2-CH(OH)-CH2- substructure, whereas 7 (+·) is coproduced from compounds with methoxy substituents. Compared to CAD, metastable ion characteristics combined with neutralization-reionization allow for a superior differentiation of the ions studied.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24203430     DOI: 10.1016/1044-0305(96)00053-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  4 in total

1.  The validity of the "diradical" hypothesis: direct femtoscond studies of the transition-state structures.

Authors:  S Pedersen; J L Herek; A H Zewail
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neutralization agents for neutralization-reionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  P O Danis; R Feng; F W McLafferty
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Characterization of the C3H 6O (+·) ion from 2-methoxyethanol. Mixture analysis by dissociation and neutralization-reionization.

Authors:  M J Polce; C Wesdemiotis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  The neutral products formed during backbone fragmentations of protonated peptides in tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M M Cordero; J J Houser; C Wesdemiotis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  CH3CH+* formation from some C3H6O+* isomers according to theory.

Authors:  Charles E Hudson; David J McAdoo; John C Traeger
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Why CH3CH3+* formation competes with H* loss from CCCO C3H6O+* isomers.

Authors:  Charles E Hudson; David J McAdoo; Lawrence L Griffin; John C Traeger
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.109

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.