Literature DB >> 24203264

E-O technique is superior to E-C technique in manikins during single person bag mask ventilation performed by novices.

Goneppanavar Umesh1, Rohith Krishna, Souvik Chaudhuri, Thomas Joseph Tim, Rao Shwethapriya.   

Abstract

Conventional E-C technique of mask holding is unreliable during single person bag mask ventilation (BMV) due mainly to leak around the mask and inexperience of the persons. In this manikin study, conventional E-C technique was compared with E-O technique during single person BMV both with experienced (n = 50) and novice (n = 50) volunteers. The E-O technique involved encircling the mask neck with the web between thumb and index finger while the other digits provided chin lift. Two independent observers recorded the chest expansion as 1 (nil), 2 (minimal), 3 (moderate) and 4 (good). For analysis ideal and average chest expansion were clubbed as acceptable. E-C technique in experienced volunteers showed acceptable results in 49 (31 + 18) occasions, while with novices acceptable is 39 (17 + 22). With E-O technique, expansion was acceptable in 47 (38 + 9) experienced volunteers, and acceptable in 46 (32 + 14) novices. (P = 0.003). In cross over analysis for experienced volunteers, similar chest expansion was obtained on 30 occasions with both techniques, E-C better than E-O on 8 and E-O better than E-C on 12 occasions. Novices had comparable results on 17 occasions, E-C better than E-O on 8 and E-O better than E-C on 25 occasions (P = 0.016). The conventionally taught E-C technique of single person BMV provides acceptable chest expansion on most occasions with experienced operators than novices. Novices should use E-O technique as the first choice for single person BMV. Both techniques may be used interchangeably when one fails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24203264     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9531-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  9 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Facemask, nasal, and oral airway devices.

Authors:  Robert S Greenberg
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12

3.  Part 8: Advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Laurie J Morrison; Charles D Deakin; Peter T Morley; Clifton W Callaway; Richard E Kerber; Steven L Kronick; Eric J Lavonas; Mark S Link; Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Michael Parr; Michael Shuster; Kjetil Sunde; Mary Ann Peberdy; Wanchun Tang; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Bernd W Böttiger; Saul Drajer; Swee Han Lim; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Robert A Berg; Robin Hemphill; Benjamin S Abella; Tom P Aufderheide; Diana M Cave; Mary Fran Hazinski; E Brooke Lerner; Thomas D Rea; Michael R Sayre; Robert A Swor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Retention of ventilation skills of emergency nurses after training with the SMART BAG compared to a standard bag-valve-mask.

Authors:  Melissa De Regge; Catherine Vogels; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Paul A Calle
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  A Scottish National Prospective Study of airway management skills in new-start SHOs.

Authors:  C Whymark; A Moores; A D MacLeod
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  An evaluation of emergency medical technicians' ability to use manual ventilation devices.

Authors:  R Elling; J Politis
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  A two-handed jaw-thrust technique is superior to the one-handed "EC-clamp" technique for mask ventilation in the apneic unconscious person.

Authors:  Aaron M Joffe; Scott Hetzel; Elaine C Liew
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Difficult mask ventilation.

Authors:  Mohammad El-Orbany; Harvey J Woehlck
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.108

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of preoxygenation efficiency with Intersurgical Economy and Intersurgical QuadraLite anaesthetic face masks.

Authors:  Greta Sakalauskaitė; Evaldas Kauzonas; Greta Bukelytė; Rūta Janulevičienė; Eglė Kontrimavičiūtė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2019

2.  Comparison of four techniques on facility of two-hand Bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation: E-C, Thenar Eminence, Thenar Eminence (Dominant hand)-E-C (non-dominant hand) and Thenar Eminence (non-dominant hand) - E-C (dominant hand).

Authors:  Maryam Soleimanpour; Farzad Rahmani; Alireza Ala; Hamid Reza Morteza Bagi; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Samad Ej Golzari; Fatemeh Zahmatyar; Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani; Hassan Soleimanpour
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  EO technique provides better mask seal than the EC clamp technique during single handed mask holding by novices in anaesthetised and paralysed patients.

Authors:  Goneppanavar Umesh; Gopal V Gotur; Amrut Krishnananda Rao; Tim Thomas Joseph
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-10

4.  Comparison of Three Techniques on Facility of Bag-Mask Ventilation: Thenar Eminence, E-O and E-C.

Authors:  Maryam Soleimanpour; Farzad Rahmani; Hamid Reza Morteza Bagi; Alireza Ala; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Fatemeh Hassani; Seyed Mahdi Sharifi; Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani; Hassan Soleimanpour
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.