Literature DB >> 24202850

The threshold problem in ecotoxicology.

J Cairns1.   

Abstract

The most commonly used threshold in environmental toxicology is the LC50 (or modifications thereof) where 50% of the organisms die or are otherwise affected at a certain concentration of a chemical for a particular time of exposure under specified environmental conditions. Most commonly, this particular threshold is derived from single species laboratory tests low in environmental realism. If the field of ecotoxicology truly examines the effects of chemicals on ecosystems (i.e., complex multivariate systems), serious consideration must be given to thresholds other than those now commonly used in the field of environmental toxicology. Attributes at the community and ecosystem level of organization are not demonstrated at lower levels of biological organization, for example, energy flow and nutrient spiralling. Key issues are whether extrapolation is possible from one threshold to another within a level of biological organization and from one level of biological organization to another for thresholds that do not exist at many levels. Thresholds may be artefacts of testing procedures and may not exist in natural systems. Nevertheless, society must make management decisions about risk with available methods, including those designed to identify some point or threshold below which no deleterious effects are observed. However, these methods and their assumptions deserve more explicit and systematic examination than they have received thus far.

Year:  1992        PMID: 24202850     DOI: 10.1007/BF00702652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  5 in total

1.  Effects of ammonia on periphytic communities.

Authors:  B R Niederlehner; J Cairns
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Does the Ozone Hole Threaten Antarctic Life?: Early evidence is just coming in; so far, the answer is far from clear and investigators are divided.

Authors:  L Roberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Field evaluation of predictions of environmental effects from a multispecies-microcosm toxicity test.

Authors:  B R Niederlehner; K W Pontasch; J R Pratt; J Cairns
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Levels of biological organization: an organism-centered approach.

Authors:  J A MacMahon; D L Phillips; J V Robinson; D J Schimpf
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.589

5.  Free Radicals Within the Antarctic Vortex: The Role of CFCs in Antarctic Ozone Loss.

Authors:  J G Anderson; D W Toohey; W H Brune
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Measuring the avoidance behaviour shown by the snail Hydrobia ulvae exposed to sediment with a known contamination gradient.

Authors:  Cristiano V M Araújo; Julián Blasco; Ignacio Moreno-Garrido
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Survival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?

Authors:  Carole Forfait-Dubuc; Sandrine Charles; Elise Billoir; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Finding biomarkers is getting easier.

Authors:  Brian Patrick Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Zinc, among a 'cocktail' of metal pollutants, is responsible for the absence of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber from the vicinity of a primary smelting works.

Authors:  S P Hopkin; C A Hames
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.