Literature DB >> 24202814

Laterality differences and practice effects under central backward masking conditions.

T B Ward1, L E Ross.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine laterality differences and practice effects under various central backward masking conditions. Critical stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was determined for subjects on 3 consecutive days using single letters as target stimuli (TS) and a pattern masking stimulus (MS). There was a right visual field (RVF) advantage on Day 1 but no difference between the visual fields on following days. The decline in the RVF advantage appeared to be dependent upon prior experience with laterally located letters, to be independent of initial experience with a particular set of letters, and to be more pronounced for females than for males. In addition, large improvements in performance were found, particularly between the first and second testing sessions. These practice effects were discussed in terms of the possible development of strategies for enhancing TS features or attenuating MS features.

Year:  1977        PMID: 24202814     DOI: 10.3758/BF03197365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  MONOPTIC AND DICHOPTIC VISUAL MASKING BY PATTERNS AND FLASHES.

Authors:  P H SCHILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-02

2.  Hemispheric processing differences revealed by differential conditioning and reaction time performance.

Authors:  J B Hellige
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1975-12

3.  Sex and coding strategy effects on reaction time to hemispheric probes.

Authors:  R L Metzger; J R Antes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-03

4.  Parallel but temporally displaced visual half-field metacontrast functions.

Authors:  W F McKeever; M Suberi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Perceptual laterality and iconic recognition of visual materials by Karsakoff patients and normal adults.

Authors:  M Oscar-Berman; H Goodglass; D G Cherlow
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-02

6.  On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Selective attention.

Authors:  H Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli.

Authors:  G Geffen; J L Bradshaw; G Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-03
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Central sources of visual masking: indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.

Authors:  C F Michaels; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1979

2.  Hemispheric differences in stimulus identification.

Authors:  J M Polich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-07

3.  Hemispheric differences in semantic processing: category matching is not the same as category membership.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; R M Klein; J Day
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.