Literature DB >> 24202564

The toxicity of aluminum to aquatic species in the US.

F Gostomski1.   

Abstract

In August 1988 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published an ambient water quality criteria document for the protection of aquatic organisms from the toxic effects of aluminum. The EPA water quality criteria were developed utilizing procedures described in theGuidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses, and after careful analysis of the latest toxicological information available to EPA on the adverse effects of aluminum on aquatic vertebrates, invertebrates and plants.The EPA criteria recommend that the four-day average concentration of aluminum not exceed 87 μg L(-1) more than once every three years on the average when the ambient pH is between 6.5 and 9.0 to provide protection from chronic toxicity. The criteria also recommend that the one-hour average concentration of aluminum not exceed 750 μg L(-1) more than once every three years on the average when the ambient pH is between 6.5 and 9.0 to provide protection from acute toxicity.Acute toxicity data for 20 species of freshwater aquatic organisms and chronic toxicity data for five species of freshwater aquatic organisms were utilized to develop the EPA water quality criteria. Striped bass and brook trout were observed to be the two most sensitive North American species to the toxic effects of aluminum. Aluminum toxicity was also observed to be increased at lower pH.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24202564     DOI: 10.1007/BF01734047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  2 in total

1.  Toxicity of heavy metals and salts to Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.).

Authors:  R A Stanley
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Acute and chronic effects of alum to midge larva (Diptera: chironomidae).

Authors:  D S Lamb; G C Bailey
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.151

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  The influence of acidic mine and spoil drainage on water quality in the mid-Wales area.

Authors:  R Fuge; I M Laidlaw; W T Perkins; K P Rogers
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Long-term chemical and biological improvement in an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed.

Authors:  Bruce E Underwood; Natalie A Kruse; Jennifer R Bowman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Daphnia magna to Dewatered Drinking Water Treatment Residue.

Authors:  Nannan Yuan; Yuansheng Pei; Anping Bao; Changhui Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Behaviors of Microcystis aeruginosa cells during floc storage in drinking water treatment process.

Authors:  Hangzhou Xu; Haiyan Pei; Hongdi Xiao; Yan Jin; Xiuqing Li; Wenrong Hu; Chunxia Ma; Jiongming Sun; Hongmin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.