Literature DB >> 24202355

Genome-wide reduction in recombination of backcross progeny derived from male versus female gametes in an interspecific cross of tomato.

M C de Vicente1, S D Tanksley.   

Abstract

We have determined that meiotic recombination differs between male and female gametes derived from the same plant. A single F1 plant was backcrossed to each of the parents, Lycopersicon esculentum and L pennellii, as the male (BCE) and female (BCP) parent, respectively. A total of 85 RFLP markers, covering more than 75% of the tomato genome, was used to construct a genetic map for both populations. Since both recurrent parents were homozygous, recombination measured in each population reflects crossing-over rates leading to male (BCE) and female (BCP) gametes. Comparisons were made by interval (genetic distance between two adjacent markers), by chromosome, and for the total length of the genome. Significantly less recombination was observed for male gametes at all levels. No significant relationship was found between areas of reduced recombination and approximate location to the centromere. That selection plays some role could not be eliminated, but no clear evidence was observed for single-locus selection as a major factor in the general reduction of crossing-overs in male gametes.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 24202355     DOI: 10.1007/BF00226248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  15 in total

1.  Different Frequency in the Recovery of Crossover Products from Male and Female Gametes of Plants Hypoploid for B-a Translocations in Maize.

Authors:  D S Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Unilateral Incompatibility between SOLANUM PENNELLII and LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM.

Authors:  J J Hardon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Cytogenetics of Speciation in Gossypium. I. Selective Elimination of the Donor Parent Genotype in Interspecific Backcrosses.

Authors:  S G Stephens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Construction of human genetic linkage maps: I. Progress and perspectives.

Authors:  R White; M Leppert; P O'Connell; Y Nakamura; C Julier; S Woodward; A Silva; R Wolff; M Lathrop; J M Lalouel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1986

5.  Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences.

Authors:  R Bernatzky; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The genetic control of meiosis.

Authors:  B S Baker; A T Carpenter; M S Esposito; R E Esposito; L Sandler
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.

Authors:  A P Feinberg; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Linkage relationships reflecting ancestral tetraploidy in salmonid fish.

Authors:  K R Johnson; J E Wright; B May
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic linkage in the horse. II. Distribution of male recombination estimates and the influence of age, breed and sex on recombination frequency.

Authors:  L Andersson; K Sandberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green; J Abrahamson; A Barlow; M J Daly; S E Lincoln; L A Newberg; L Newburg
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  29 in total

1.  Bayesian mapping of genome-wide epistatic imprinted loci for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Shize Li; Xin Wang; Jiahan Li; Tianfu Yang; Lingjiang Min; Yang Liu; Min Lin; Runqing Yang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Unilateral incompatibility gene ui1.1 encodes an S-locus F-box protein expressed in pollen of Solanum species.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex influence on recombination frequency in Secale cereale L.

Authors:  C Benito; M P Romero; N Henriques-Gil; F Llorente; A M Figueiras
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Heterozygosity in 2n gametes of potato evaluated by RFLP markers.

Authors:  A Barone; C Gebhardt; L Frusciante
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Higher recombination frequencies in female compared to male meisoses in Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  M J Kearsey; L D Ramsay; D E Jennings; D J Lydiate; E J Bohuon; D F Marshall
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Bayesian model selection for characterizing genomic imprinting effects and patterns.

Authors:  Runqing Yang; Xin Wang; Zeyuan Wu; Daniel R Prows; Min Lin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  An RFLP linkage map of Lycopersicon peruvianum.

Authors:  J W van Ooijen; J M Sandbrink; M Vrielink; R Verkerk; P Zabel; P Lindhout
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Integration of the classical and RFLP linkage maps of the short arm of tomato chromosome 1.

Authors:  P J Balint-Kurti; D A Jones; J D Jones
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Analysis of recombination rate in female and male gametogenesis in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) using RFLP markers.

Authors:  C S Busso; C J Liu; C T Hash; J R Witcombe; K M Devos; J M de Wet; M D Gale
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Fine mapping of ui6.1, a gametophytic factor controlling pollen-side unilateral incompatibility in interspecific solanum hybrids.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Suzanne Royer; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.