Literature DB >> 24201388

Local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial.

Salvatore Pucciarelli1, Antonino De Paoli, Mario Guerrieri, Giuseppe La Torre, Isacco Maretto, Francesco De Marchi, Giovanna Mantello, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Donato Nitti, Vincenzo Valentini, Claudio Coco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal local excision has been suggested as an attractive approach for patients with rectal cancer who show a major clinical response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of transanal local excision on the local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients who had a major clinical response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
DESIGN: Sequential 2-stage phase II study for early efficacy.
SETTING: Multicenter study. PATIENTS: Patients with clinical T3 or low-lying T2 rectal adenocarcinoma that showed a major clinical response after a preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Eligible patients underwent a full-thickness transanal local excision. According to their histopathology, the patients staged as ypT0-1 were observed, while the remaining patients were recommended to undergo a subsequent total mesorectal excision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A local recurrence rate of ≤5% was set as a successful rate for stopping the trial early after the first stage.
RESULTS: The study group included 63 patients. Before chemoradiotherapy, patients were staged as clinical T3 (n = 42) and T2 (n = 21). After the local excision, 43 patients fulfilled the criteria to be observed with no further treatment. Nine of the remaining 20 patients for whom a subsequent total mesorectal excision was recommended refused surgery. Two of these patients who refused surgery had intraluminal local recurrence; both had a ypT2 tumor and underwent salvage surgery. The estimated cumulative 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival and local disease-free survival were 91.5% (95% CI: 75.9-97.2), 91.0% (95% CI: 77.0-96.6) and 96.9% (95% CI: 80.3-99.5), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The time of follow-up is still short and the sample size is limited.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that local excision is a good option for patients with a major clinical response after chemoradiotherapy. A longer period of follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24201388     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a2303e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  40 in total

Review 1.  Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irshad Shaikh; Alan Askari; Suzana Ourû; Janindra Warusavitarne; Thanos Athanasiou; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy affects postoperative outcomes and functional results in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  G Rizzo; D P Pafundi; F Sionne; L D'Agostino; G Pietricola; M A Gambacorta; V Valentini; C Coco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Local Excision and Endoscopic Resections for Early Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Juan Pablo Celentano; Flavia Andrea Alexandre; Bruna Borba Vailati
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 4.  Organ-Preserving Strategies for the Management of Near-Complete Responses in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Patricio B Lynn; Paul Strombom; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Angelo Restivo; Luigi Zorcolo; Giuseppe D'Alia; Francesca Cocco; Andrea Cossu; Francesco Scintu; Giuseppe Casula
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; L Bacigalupo; I Maretto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Rectal sparing approach after preoperative radio- and/or chemotherapy (RESARCH) in patients with rectal cancer: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  A Barina; A De Paoli; P Delrio; M Guerrieri; A Muratore; F Bianco; D Vespa; C Asteria; E Morpurgo; A Restivo; C Coco; U Pace; C Belluco; C Aschele; S Lonardi; V Valentini; G Mantello; I Maretto; P Del Bianco; A Perin; S Pucciarelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Pathologic response grade after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not influence morbidity in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer resected by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Filippo Landi; Eloy Espín; Victor Rodrigues; Francesc Vallribera; Aleix Martinez; Cecile Charpy; Francesco Brunetti; Daniel Azoulay; Nicola de'Angelis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Paola De Nardi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.