Literature DB >> 24201202

Sequence Determination of Burkholderia pseudomallei Strain NCTC 13392 Colony Morphology Variants.

Julia Vipond1, Jennifer Kane, Graham Hatch, Jamison McCorrison, William C Nierman, Liliana Losada.   

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a biothreat and the causative agent of melioidosis. There are at least seven known colony morphotypes of B. pseudomallei that appear to have different virulence properties in animal models. We report the genome sequence of B. pseudomallei strain NCTC 13392 and the genomic variations of its eight morphotype derivatives.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24201202      PMCID: PMC3820783          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00925-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Burkholderia pseudomallei bacteria can be found in a wide variety of habitats and are capable of infecting a large range of hosts. Recent reports have documented numerous colony morphology types, even within a clonal population, and have indicated that differences exist in the proteomes and the virulence properties of these variants (1, 2). To understand the genetic underpinnings of these differences, we sequenced and assembled the genome of the wild-type morphology variant of B. pseudomallei strain NCTC 13392. In addition, we sequenced eight other morphotypes derived from the same strain after passage in a small animal model system. All animal work in the United Kingdom is conducted in compliance with the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. In addition, all procedures were conducted under a project license approved by the ethical review process of Public Health England, Salisbury, United Kingdom, prior to Home Office approval. BALB/c mice were infected with a presented dose of approximately 3,000 CFU via aerosol challenge using the AeroMP-Henderson apparatus. After 1 to 4 days, depending on the health of the animals, solid organs were homogenized in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) and bacteria were plated on selective Ashdown’s medium and incubated for 7 days at 37°C (3). Colonies displaying variant morphotypes were picked and genomic DNA was prepared with the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end 100-bp Illumina fragment reads (~60× coverage) were used for genome sequence determination. All reads were used to generate assemblies with Celera Assembler 6.1 (4). The resulting assemblies ranged from 61 to 80 scaffolds containing 143 to 263 contigs, with N50s ranging from 52 kb to 91 kb. As seen previously with other B. pseudomallei strains, all genomes had 2 chromosomes (5, 6) with sizes similar to those of the reference strain B. pseudomallei K96243 (roughly 4.1 Mb and 3.17 Mb for chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively). The genome sequence of the isolate with wild-type morphology was annotated using the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) annotation pipeline (http://www.jcvi.org) and submitted to GenBank. As expected, the genomes were >99% identical between all the isolates. The sequence reads from eight other morphotypes were mapped to the wild-type morphology reference genome. In each case, nearly 100% of the bases were covered by sequencing. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), insertions/deletions (indels), and structural variations were identified using the CLC Genomics Workbench. After filtering, no single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in any of the morphotypes. Since other organisms may regulate morphology by phase variation via strand slippage at repetitive sequences (7), we performed a comparative analysis of short tandem repeats in the morphotypes. Though we detected differences in structural variants and/or variations in numbers of tandem repeats in the morphotypes, none of the differences were conserved across morphotypes and thus might be a result of differences in sequencing and assemblies rather than of biological differences. The results presented here suggest that the differences in morphology are more likely due to epigenetic factors, gene expression programs, and/or proteome variations rather than a result of genomic sequence differences.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The B. pseudomallei whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under the accession no. AUVI00000000, AWEO00000000, AUVJ00000000, AUVK00000000, AUVL00000000, AUVM00000000, AUVN00000000, AUVO00000000, and AUVP00000000.
  6 in total

1.  Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Matthew T G Holden; Richard W Titball; Sharon J Peacock; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Timothy Atkins; Lisa C Crossman; Tyrone Pitt; Carol Churcher; Karen Mungall; Stephen D Bentley; Mohammed Sebaihia; Nicholas R Thomson; Nathalie Bason; Ifor R Beacham; Karen Brooks; Katherine A Brown; Nat F Brown; Greg L Challis; Inna Cherevach; Tracy Chillingworth; Ann Cronin; Ben Crossett; Paul Davis; David DeShazer; Theresa Feltwell; Audrey Fraser; Zahra Hance; Heidi Hauser; Simon Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Karen E Keith; Mark Maddison; Sharon Moule; Claire Price; Michael A Quail; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Kim Rutherford; Mandy Sanders; Mark Simmonds; Sirirurg Songsivilai; Kim Stevens; Sarinna Tumapa; Monkgol Vesaratchavest; Sally Whitehead; Corin Yeats; Bart G Barrell; Petra C F Oyston; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Biological relevance of colony morphology and phenotypic switching by Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Narisara Chantratita; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Khaemaporn Boonbumrung; Rachaneeporn Tiyawisutsri; Mongkol Vesaratchavest; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Wirongrong Chierakul; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Sasithorn Pukritiyakamee; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Production of hemolysin and other extracellular enzymes by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas pseudomallei.

Authors:  L R Ashdown; J M Koehler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A genomic survey of positive selection in Burkholderia pseudomallei provides insights into the evolution of accidental virulence.

Authors:  Tannistha Nandi; Catherine Ong; Arvind Pratap Singh; Justin Boddey; Timothy Atkins; Mitali Sarkar-Tyson; Angela E Essex-Lopresti; Hui Hoon Chua; Talima Pearson; Jason F Kreisberg; Christina Nilsson; Pramila Ariyaratne; Catherine Ronning; Liliana Losada; Yijun Ruan; Wing-Kin Sung; Donald Woods; Richard W Titball; Ifor Beacham; Ian Peak; Paul Keim; William C Nierman; Patrick Tan
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Proteomic analysis of colony morphology variants of Burkholderia pseudomallei defines a role for the arginine deiminase system in bacterial survival.

Authors:  Narisara Chantratita; Sarunporn Tandhavanant; Chanthiwa Wikraiphat; Lily A Trunck; Drew A Rholl; Aunchalee Thanwisai; Natnaree Saiprom; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Sunee Korbsrisate; Nicholas P J Day; Herbert P Schweizer; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates.

Authors:  Jason R Miller; Arthur L Delcher; Sergey Koren; Eli Venter; Brian P Walenz; Anushka Brownley; Justin Johnson; Kelvin Li; Clark Mobarry; Granger Sutton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Deeplasmid: deep learning accurately separates plasmids from bacterial chromosomes.

Authors:  William B Andreopoulos; Alexander M Geller; Miriam Lucke; Jan Balewski; Alicia Clum; Natalia N Ivanova; Asaf Levy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Phylogeography of Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolates, Western Hemisphere.

Authors:  Jay E Gee; Christopher A Gulvik; Mindy G Elrod; Dhwani Batra; Lori A Rowe; Mili Sheth; Alex R Hoffmaster
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Characterization of in vitro phenotypes of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei strains potentially associated with persistent infection in mice.

Authors:  R C Bernhards; C K Cote; K Amemiya; D M Waag; C P Klimko; P L Worsham; S L Welkos
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Genomic comparison and phenotypic profiling of small colony variants of Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Noorfatin Jihan Zulkefli; Cindy Shuan Ju Teh; Vanitha Mariappan; Soo Tein Ngoi; Jamuna Vadivelu; Sasheela Ponnampalavanar; Lay Ching Chai; Chun Wie Chong; Ivan Kok Seng Yap; Kumutha Malar Vellasamy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.