Literature DB >> 24201179

Sepsis visits and antibiotic utilization in U.S. emergency departments*.

Michael R Filbin1, Sarah A Arias, Carlos A Camargo, Apurv Barche, Daniel J Pallin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To monitor the frequency of sepsis visits in U.S. emergency departments and assess the appropriateness of antibiotic utilization.
DESIGN: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, defining sepsis as an explicit diagnosis of sepsis via International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 038, 995.91, 995.92, or 785.52. We also monitored trends using cases inferred by infection plus organ dysfunction without explicit diagnosis of sepsis, which we refer to as implicit sepsis cases. We assess changes in visit frequency and ascertain emergency department antibiotic administration rates.
SETTING: Four-stage probability sample of visits to U.S. emergency departments, excluding Federal/military. PATIENTS: Adult emergency department visits, United States, 1994-2009.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sepsis was diagnosed explicitly at 260,000 visits per year in U.S. emergency departments (95% CI, 251,000-270,000) or 1.23 visits per 1,000 U.S. population. The visit rate remained stable from 1994 to 2009 (p for trend 0.42). By contrast, the rate of visits with an implicit diagnosis of sepsis increased by 0.07 every 2 years (95% CI, 0.04-0.10; p for trend 0.002). Antibiotics were prescribed in the emergency department during 61% (95% CI, 57-65) of explicit sepsis visits. This increased from 52% in 1994-1997 to 69% in 2006-2009 (difference, 17%; 95% CI, 16.8-17.2). Of antibiotic regimens, 18% covered methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 27% Pseudomonas, and 10% extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria, without evidence of targeting according to known risk factors. Of explicit sepsis cases, 31% were admitted to the ICU with 40% mortality (95% CI, 30-51). Overall hospital mortality was 17% (95% CI, 11-22).
CONCLUSIONS: Explicitly diagnosed sepsis visits did not become more common during 1994-2009. Our data suggest that many emergency department patients with sepsis do not receive antibiotics until they arrive on the inpatient unit. When antibiotics are used among septic emergency department patients, drug-resistant bacteria are covered infrequently. These methods provide a simple approach to tracking the frequency with which sepsis is diagnosed among emergency department patients and to monitoring antibiotic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24201179     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  19 in total

1.  Central Venous Access Capability and Critical Care Telemedicine Decreases Inter-Hospital Transfer Among Severe Sepsis Patients: A Mixed Methods Design.

Authors:  Steven A Ilko; J Priyanka Vakkalanka; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Karisa K Harland; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Improved Early Detection of Sepsis in the ED With a Novel Monocyte Distribution Width Biomarker.

Authors:  Elliott D Crouser; Joseph E Parrillo; Christopher Seymour; Derek C Angus; Keri Bicking; Liliana Tejidor; Robert Magari; Diana Careaga; JoAnna Williams; Douglas R Closser; Michael Samoszuk; Luke Herren; Emily Robart; Fernando Chaves
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Sepsis outside intensive care unit: the other side of the coin.

Authors:  F Mearelli; D Orso; N Fiotti; N Altamura; A Breglia; M De Nardo; I Paoli; M Zanetti; C Casarsa; G Biolo
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Association of triage hypothermia with in-hospital mortality among patients in the emergency department with suspected sepsis.

Authors:  Sriram Ramgopal; Christopher M Horvat; Mark D Adler
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 5.  Improving the Recognition of, and Response to In-Hospital Sepsis.

Authors:  Peter Chan; Sandra Peake; Rinaldo Bellomo; Daryl Jones
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Rural Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Bypass Rural Hospitals Have Increased Mortality: An Instrumental Variables Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Marcia M Ward; James C Torner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; James C Torner
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Most emergency department patients meeting sepsis criteria are not diagnosed with sepsis at discharge.

Authors:  John M Litell; Faheem Guirgis; Brian Driver; Alan E Jones; Michael A Puskarich
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study).

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Uche E Okoro; Brian M Fuller; Kalyn Campbell; Morgan B Swanson; Stephen Q Simpson; Edith A Parker; Luke J Mack; Amanda Bell; Katie DeJong; Brett Faine; Anne Zepeski; Keith Mueller; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Christopher R Carpenter; Michael P Jones; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.744

10.  Adequate antibiotic therapy prior to ICU admission in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock reduces hospital mortality.

Authors:  José Garnacho-Montero; Antonio Gutiérrez-Pizarraya; Ana Escoresca-Ortega; Esperanza Fernández-Delgado; José María López-Sánchez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.