D Zerkak1, J-C Métivier, B Fouquet, J Beaudreuil. 1. Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, CHU de Tours, 37170 Chambray lès Tours, France; Service de rhumatologie, CHC de Maisons-Laffitte, 78600 Maisons-Laffitte, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate a French version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients due to participate in a functional rehabilitation programme for chronic low back pain were included prospectively. The RMDQ, the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) and the "daily activities" subscale of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) were administered. The RMDQ was assessed for internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the RMDQ was 0.84. The intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] was 0.89 [0.83-0.93]. The RMDQ score was correlated with the QBPDS score (r=0.713) and the DPQ's "daily activities" subscore (r=0.514). The results of assessments before and after functional rehabilitation showed that the French version of the RMDQ had very high sensitivity to change (effect size: 1.49) and was more sensitive than the QBPDS and the DPQ's "daily activities" subscore. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validated the French version of the RMDQ in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Furthermore, we highlighted the questionnaire's very high sensitivity to change.
OBJECTIVE: To validate a French version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients due to participate in a functional rehabilitation programme for chronic low back pain were included prospectively. The RMDQ, the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) and the "daily activities" subscale of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) were administered. The RMDQ was assessed for internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the RMDQ was 0.84. The intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] was 0.89 [0.83-0.93]. The RMDQ score was correlated with the QBPDS score (r=0.713) and the DPQ's "daily activities" subscore (r=0.514). The results of assessments before and after functional rehabilitation showed that the French version of the RMDQ had very high sensitivity to change (effect size: 1.49) and was more sensitive than the QBPDS and the DPQ's "daily activities" subscore. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validated the French version of the RMDQ in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Furthermore, we highlighted the questionnaire's very high sensitivity to change.
Authors: Agathe Blanchard; Sao Mai Nguyen; Maxime Devanne; Mathieu Simonnet; Myriam Le Goff-Pronost; Olivier Rémy-Néris Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Manuel Trinidad-Fernández; David Beckwée; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas; Manuel González-Sánchez; Francisco-Angel Moreno; Javier González-Jiménez; Erika Joos; Peter Vaes Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 3.576