Literature DB >> 24200863

Long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements and association with their covariates.

Cassidy Powers1, Bo Fan1, Lori G Borrud2, Anne C Looker2, John A Shepherd3.   

Abstract

Few studies have described the long-term repeatability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Even fewer studies have been performed with enough participants to identify possible precision covariates such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Our objective was to investigate the long-term repeatability of both total and subregional body composition measurements and their associations with covariates in a large sample. Two valid whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were available for 609 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2000-2002. Participants with scan-quality issues were excluded. Participants varied in race and ethnicity, sex, age (mean 38.8±17.5; range 16-69 yr), and BMI (mean, 26.9±5.2; range 14.1-43.5 kg/m2). The length of time between scans ranged from 3 to 51 days (mean, 18.7±8.4). Precision error estimates for total body measures (bone mineral density, bone mineral content, lean mass, total mass, fat mass, and percent body fat) were calculated as root mean square percent coefficients of variation and standard deviations. The average root mean square percent coefficients of variation and root mean square standard deviations of the precision error for total body variables were 1.12 and 0.01 g/cm2 for bone mineral density, 1.14 and 27.3 g for bone mineral content, 1.97 and 505 g for fat mass, 1.46 and 760 g for lean mass, 1.10 and 858 g for total mass, and 1.80 and 0.59 for percent body fat. In general, only fat and lean masses were impacted by participant and scan qualities (obesity category, sex, the magnitude of the body composition variables, and time between scans). We conclude that long-term precision error values are impacted by BMI, and sex. Our long-term precision error estimates may be more suitable than short-term precision for calculating least significant change and monitoring time intervals.
Copyright © 2015 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Hologic; bone mineral density; precision; whole body

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24200863     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  4 in total

1.  Hip Fractures Risk in Older Men and Women Associated With DXA-Derived Measures of Thigh Subcutaneous Fat Thickness, Cross-Sectional Muscle Area, and Muscle Density.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Peggy M Cawthon; Kathy Wilt Peters; Jane A Cauley; Rachel A Murphy; Marjolein Visser; Joseph P Wilson; Tamara Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Steve Cummings; John A Shepherd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Caution Against Overinterpreting Time-Restricted Eating Results.

Authors:  Grant M Tinsley; Courtney M Peterson; Benjamin D Horne
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 44.409

3.  Comparison of Techniques for Tracking Body Composition Changes across a Season in College Women Basketball Players.

Authors:  Ashley Ploudre; Jana L Arabas; Liz Jorn; Jerry L Mayhew
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

4.  Estimates of the precision of regional and whole body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in persons with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Christopher M Cirnigliaro; William A Bauman; Robert A Adler
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.