Literature DB >> 24200715

Characteristics of a large sample of candidates for permanent ventricular pacing included in the Biventricular Pacing for Atrio-ventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization Study (BioPace).

Reinhard C Funck1, Hans-Helge Mueller, Maurizio Lunati, Christopher Piorkowski, Luc De Roy, Vince Paul, Michael Wittenberg, David Wuensch, Jean-Jacques Blanc.   

Abstract

AIMS: The general clinical profile of European pacemaker recipients who require predominant ventricular pacing (VP) is scarcely known. We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics of the 1808 participants (out of 1833 randomized patients) of the ongoing Biventricular Pacing for Atrio-ventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace) study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: BioPace recruited patients between May 2003 and September 2007 predominantly in European medical centres. We analysed demographic data and described clinical characteristics and electrophysiological parameters prior to device implantation in 1808 enrolled patients. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of the 1808 patients was 73.5 ± 9.2 years, 1235 (68%) were men, 654 (36%) presented without structural heart disease, 547 (30%) had ischemic, 355 (20%) hypertensive, 146 (8%) valvular, and 102 (6%) non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55.4 ± 12.3%. The main pacing indications were (a) permanent and intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block in 973 (54%), (b) atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular rate in 313 (17%), and (c) miscellaneous bradyarrhythmias in 522 (29%) patients. Mean QRS duration was 118.5 ± 30.5 ms, left bundle branch block was present in 316 (17%), and atrial tachyarrhythmias in 426 (24%) patients.
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this sample is a representative source of description of the general profile of European pacemaker recipients who require predominant VP. Patients' characteristics included advanced age, predominantly male gender, preserved left ventricular systolic function, high-grade AV block, narrow QRS complex, and atrial tachyarrhythmias, the latter being present in nearly one-fourth of the cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial tachyarrhythmias; Atrioventricular block; Bradycardia; Left ventricular function; Permanent ventricular pacing; QRS width; Structural heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24200715     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  10 in total

1.  [Device therapy of chronic heart failure: Update 2015].

Authors:  C W Israel; L Ekosso-Ejangue; M-K Sheta
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Permanent His bundle pacing: shaping the future of physiological ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Novel Pacing Strategies for Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  Jordan S Leyton-Mange; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  His Bundle Pacing Or Biventricular Pacing For Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy In Heart Failure: Discovering New Methods For An Old Problem.

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 5.  Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.

Authors:  Hiroko Beck; Anne B Curtis
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

Review 6.  Co-Morbidities and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: When Should They Modify Patient Selection?

Authors:  Martin H Ruwald
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction defects.

Authors:  Dasheng Lu; Hongxiang Zhang; Chu Chen; Kai Wang; Qijun Shan
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing in the Heart Failure Population.

Authors:  Justin Gould; Benjamin Sieniewicz; Bradley Porter; Baldeep Sidhu; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

Review 9.  Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Pacemakers, the Utility of Ultra-high-frequency ECG and Other Dyssynchrony Assessment Tools.

Authors:  Jan Mizner; Pavel Jurak; Hana Linkova; Radovan Smisek; Karol Curila
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2022-04

10.  Conduction system pacing versus conventional pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: Nonrandomized, on-treatment comparison.

Authors:  Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Andrew J Mathew; Angela Naperkowski; Wilson Young; Parash Pokharel; Syeda A Batul; Randle Storm; Jess W Oren; Faiz A Subzposh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-05-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.