BACKGROUND: People recovering from a stroke are less stable during walking compared to able-bodied controls. The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how post-stroke individuals adapt their steady-state gait pattern to maintain or increase their margins of stability during walking, and to examine how these strategies differ from strategies employed by able-bodied people. METHODS: Ten post-stroke individuals and 9 age-matched able-bodied individuals walked on the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Medio-lateral translations of the walking surface were imposed to manipulate gait stability. To provoke gait adaptations, a gait adaptability task was used, in which subjects occasionally had to hit a virtual target with their knees. We measured medio-lateral and backward margins of stability, and the associated gait parameters walking speed, step length, step frequency, and step width. FINDINGS: Post-stroke participants showed similar medio-lateral margins of stability as able-bodied people in all conditions. This was accomplished by a larger step width and a relatively high step frequency. Post-stroke participants walked overall slower and decreased walking speed and step length even further in response to both manipulations compared to able-bodied participants, resulting in a tendency towards an overall smaller backward margins of stability, and a significantly smaller backward margin of stability during the gait adaptability task. INTERPRETATION: Post-stroke individuals have more difficulties regulating their walking speed, and the underlying parameters step frequency and step length, compared to able-bodied controls. These quantities are important in regulating the size of the backward margin of stability when walking in complex environments.
BACKGROUND:People recovering from a stroke are less stable during walking compared to able-bodied controls. The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how post-stroke individuals adapt their steady-state gait pattern to maintain or increase their margins of stability during walking, and to examine how these strategies differ from strategies employed by able-bodied people. METHODS: Ten post-stroke individuals and 9 age-matched able-bodied individuals walked on the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Medio-lateral translations of the walking surface were imposed to manipulate gait stability. To provoke gait adaptations, a gait adaptability task was used, in which subjects occasionally had to hit a virtual target with their knees. We measured medio-lateral and backward margins of stability, and the associated gait parameters walking speed, step length, step frequency, and step width. FINDINGS: Post-strokeparticipants showed similar medio-lateral margins of stability as able-bodied people in all conditions. This was accomplished by a larger step width and a relatively high step frequency. Post-strokeparticipants walked overall slower and decreased walking speed and step length even further in response to both manipulations compared to able-bodied participants, resulting in a tendency towards an overall smaller backward margins of stability, and a significantly smaller backward margin of stability during the gait adaptability task. INTERPRETATION: Post-stroke individuals have more difficulties regulating their walking speed, and the underlying parameters step frequency and step length, compared to able-bodied controls. These quantities are important in regulating the size of the backward margin of stability when walking in complex environments.
Authors: James B Tracy; Drew A Petersen; Jamie Pigman; Benjamin C Conner; Henry G Wright; Christopher M Modlesky; Freeman Miller; Curtis L Johnson; Jeremy R Crenshaw Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Alexander T Peebles; Alyson Reinholdt; Adam P Bruetsch; Sharon G Lynch; Jessie M Huisinga Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Jesse C Dean; Aaron E Embry; Katy H Stimpson; Lindsay A Perry; Steven A Kautz Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Tom J W Buurke; Chang Liu; Sungwoo Park; Rob den Otter; James M Finley Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Emily M McCain; Matthew E Berno; Theresa L Libera; Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki; Katherine R Saul Journal: J Biomech Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 2.789