| Literature DB >> 24200028 |
Amanda R De La Torre1,2, Tongli Wang1, Barry Jaquish3, Sally N Aitken1.
Abstract
The nature of selection responsible for the maintenance of the economically and ecologically important Picea glauca × Picea engelmannii hybrid zone was investigated. Genomic, phenotypic and climatic data were used to test assumptions of hybrid zone maintenance and to model future scenarios under climate change. Genome-wide estimates of admixture based on a panel of 86 candidate gene single nucleotide polymorphisms were combined with long-term quantitative data on growth and survival (over 20 yr), as well as one-time assessments of bud burst and bud set phenology, and cold hardiness traits. A total of 15,498 individuals were phenotyped for growth and survival. Our results suggest that the P. glauca × P. engelmannii hybrid zone is maintained by local adaptation to growing season length and snowpack (exogenous selection). Hybrids appeared to be fitter than pure species in intermediate environments, which fits expectations of the bounded hybrid superiority model of hybrid zone maintenance. Adaptive introgression from parental species has probably contributed to increased hybrid fitness in intermediate habitats. While P. engelmannii ancestry is higher than P. glauca ancestry in hybrid populations, on average, selective breeding in managed hybrid populations is shifting genomic composition towards P. glauca, potentially pre-adapting managed populations to warmer climates.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive introgression; bounded hybrid superiority; breeding; climate change; exogenous selection
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24200028 PMCID: PMC4285121 DOI: 10.1111/nph.12540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Phytol ISSN: 0028-646X Impact factor: 10.151
Geographical coordinates and climatic variables for Picea glauca × Picea engelmannii common garden experiments studied
| SPZ | Site | Reps | Elevation (m) | Latitude (°) | Longitude (°) | MAT (°C) | MAP (mm) | PAS (mm) | DD < 0 | AH:M | Hab. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EK | Bloom Ck | 2 | 374 | 1676 | 49.0 | 115.4 | 2.1 | 1081 | 627 | 1111 | 11.2 | hyb |
| Perry Ck | 3 | 542 | 1463 | 49.5 | 116.0 | 2.1 | 703 | 372 | 1138 | 17.2 | hyb | |
| Red Rock | 9 | 979 | 762 | 53.7 | 122.7 | 3.5 | 599 | 217 | 1008 | 22.5 | hyb | |
| WK | Hall Ck | 10 | 1050 | 1200 | 49.2 | 116.3 | 3.8 | 820 | 393 | 895 | 16.8 | hyb |
| Duhamel | 10 | 1099 | 1475 | 49.6 | 117.2 | 2.1 | 1103 | 608 | 1082 | 11 | hyb | |
| Cortiana | 10 | 1207 | 1830 | 49.9 | 118.3 | 1.3 | 1100 | 562 | 1171 | 10.3 | ||
| QL | Little Benson | 8 | 1744 | 960 | 52.5 | 122.3 | 3 | 590 | 212 | 996 | 22 | hyb |
| Camp Ck | 8 | 1727 | 1080 | 51.4 | 120.3 | 3.3 | 638 | 260 | 936 | 20.8 | hyb | |
| Ketcham Ck | 8 | 1760 | 1380 | 53.1 | 121.4 | 1.4 | 864 | 382 | 1141 | 13.2 | hyb | |
| MR | Red Rock | 8 | 1600 | 762 | 53.7 | 122.7 | 3.5 | 599 | 217 | 1008 | 22.5 | hyb |
| FN | Fort Nelson | 8 | 3416 | 600 | 58.7 | 123.7 | −0.7 | 571 | 158 | 2113 | 16.3 |
The number of individuals (N) represents a subset of the total number of individuals planted at each site.
EK, East Kootenay; WK, West Kootenay; QL, Quesnel Lakes; FN, Fort Nelson; MR, Mount Robson (not included in fitness analysis); SPZ, seed planning zone; Reps, number of replicates; N, number of individuals; MAT, mean annual temperature; MAP, mean annual precipitation; PAS, precipitation as snow; DD < 0, degree-days below 0°C; AH: M, annual heat: moisture index (MAT + 10)/(MAP/1000); Hab, habitat; hyb, hybrid; P. eng, P. engelmannii; P. glau, P. glauca.
Figure 1Geographical location of Picea glauca × Picea engelmannii common garden experiments in each of the four geographical regions (seed planning zones (SPZ)) studied in British Columbia, Canada. EK, East Kootenay; WK, West Kootenay; MR, Mouth Robson; QL, Quesnel Lakes.
Figure 5Observed (circles) and predicted (surface) hybrid index in the two sampling areas. The predicted hybrid index for the 2050s (lower two maps) was based on projected climate for this period by the Canadian third-generation coupled global climate model CGCM3 A2 run4. Blue colour indicates Picea engelmannii and green colour, Picea glauca.
Differences among genotypic classes for phenotypic traits based on ANOVA results
| Traits | Hybrid environment | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Kootenay | East Kootenay | West Kootenay | Quesnel | Fort Nelson | ||||||
| Height age 3 yr | 1.89 | 0.1697 | – | – | ||||||
| Height age 6 yr | 1.34 | 0.2464 | – | – | ||||||
| Height age 10 yr | 1.43 | 0.2326 | 1.9 | 0.15 | – | – | ||||
| Height age 20 yr | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Frost injury −25°C | 0.01 | 0.9332 | 1.23 | 0.2982 | – | – | 0.19 | 0.829 | – | – |
| Bud burst | 0.66 | 0.5182 | 1.63 | 0.1983 | – | – | – | – | ||
| Bud set | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Genotypic classes are classified as pure Picea engelmannii, pure Picea glauca, advanced generation hybrids (Fn) and first-generation hybrids (F1), based on the NewHybrids assignment. In the Fort Nelson test site, pure species and hybrids are differentiated by elevation and geographical location of populations of origin. All genotypic classes are present at East Kootenay, Quesnel and Fort Nelson sites; at West Kootenay there is no pure P. glauca. Traits showing significant differences are indicated in bold text. Results of the introgress assignment can be found in Supporting Information Table S1. Number of individuals per genotypic class, means and standard errors for individual traits are provided in Tables S2 and S3.
Figure 2Differences in height among Picea glauca, Picea engelmannii , and their hybrids tested in sites of contrasting elevation. Intermediate-elevation tests sites are represented by (a) Quesnel and (b) East Kootenay; a high-elevation test site by (c)West Kootenay; and a low-elevation test site by (d) Fort Nelson. Red lines and dots indicate height measurements from P. glauca; blue, P. glauca-like hybrids; green, P. engelmannii-like hybrids; and black, P. engelmannii.
Figure 3Results of the survival analysis for Picea glauca, Picea engelmannii and hybrids suggest that pure species and hybrids have better survival in their own habitat. Percentage survival was compared between hybrid and pure species in the high-elevation test site in Cortiana, West Kootenay (WK; P. engelmannii habitat); the low-elevation test site in Fort Nelson (P. glauca habitat); and across nine intermediate-elevation sites in East Kootenay (EK), Quesnel Lakes (QL) and WK (P. glauca × P. engelmannii hybrids habitat). Differences between pure species and hybrids are significant at all ages. Survival estimates for all tests sites can be found in Supporting Information Table S5.
Figure 4Observed (circles) and predicted (surface) spruce hybrid index against precipitation as snow (PAS) and summer heat-moisture index (SHM). Picea glauca × Picea engelmannii predicted hybrid index was generated based on the multiple linear relationships between hybrid index and climate variables shown in Table S7.
Figure 6Breeding values versus family mean hybrid index for spruce in four seed planning zones (SPZs) represented in this study: (a) East Kootenay (EK), (b) Mount Robson (MR), (c) Quesnel (QL) and (d) West Kootenay (WK). Circles represent families with the potential for breeding based on stem volume (positive and high breeding values) or with no potential for breeding (negative or low breeding values). Individuals with a lower hybrid index are more Picea glauca-like, while those with higher hybrid indices are more Picea engelmannii-like.