Literature DB >> 24199760

Three hundred robotic-assisted mitral valve repairs: the Cedars-Sinai experience.

Danny Ramzy1, Alfredo Trento2, Wen Cheng2, Michele A De Robertis2, James Mirocha2, Andrea Ruzza2, Robert M Kass2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to review our first 300 consecutive robotic-assisted mitral repairs performed from June 2005 to October 2012 and to compare the surgical outcomes of our previously reported initial 120 cases with the subsequent 180 procedures.
METHODS: Our initial 120 robotic-assisted mitral repairs were previously reported, and we now compare our early experience with the recent 180 consecutive procedures for a total of 300 robotic-assisted mitral repairs. There was no patient selection. Every patient in need of isolated mitral valve repair underwent this procedure. All patients received an annuloplasty band and 1 or more of the following: leaflet resection, secondary chordal transposition, or polytetrafluoroethylene neochordal replacement and edge-to-edge repair.
RESULTS: All 300 patients had preoperative echocardiographic findings of severe mitral regurgitation. There were no differences (P = not significant) between the initial and the recent cohorts for preoperative characteristics, including age (58.4 ± 10.5 years vs 59.9 years), female gender (35.8% vs 36.1%), ejection fraction (61.9% vs 60.6%), congestive heart failure (35.0% vs 36.7%), creatinine (0.94 mg/dL vs 0.98 mg/dL), and New York Heart Association class. The incidence of anterior and posterior leaflet prolapse was similar in both groups, whereas Barlow syndrome was higher in group 2 (5.8% vs 27.8%). There was 1 (0.33%) hospital mortality and no deaths in the last 180 cases. Overall, 8 patients (2.7%) required subsequent mitral valve replacement via a median sternotomy, 6 (5.0%) in the first group and 2 (1.1%) in the second group (P = .06). One patient in each group had mitral valve re-repair through a right mini-thoracotomy, and 1 patient in the first group required a mitral valve replacement via a mini-thoracotomy during the original procedure. Two of the 180 patients had documented cerebrovascular accident, but both fully recovered clinically. There was no cerebrovascular accident in the last 120 patients. Crossclamp times decreased from 116 minutes to 91 minutes in the second group despite starting a training program with a junior associate performing part of the procedure at the console in the last 100 cases. Post-pump echocardiograms showed no/trace mitral regurgitation in 86.1% of the last 180 patients and mild mitral regurgitation in 11.1%. Follow-up echocardiography for the last 180 patients from 1 month to more than 1 year showed no/trace mitral regurgitation in 64.6% of patients and mild mitral regurgitation in 23.1% of patients. Seven patients (10.8%) had moderate mitral regurgitation, and 1 patient (1.5%) had severe mitral regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of complications and reoperations occurred early in our experience, especially using the first-generation da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif). The newer da Vinci Si HD system with the addition of an adjustable left atrial roof retractor together with increased experience has made robotic-assisted mitral repair of all types of degenerative mitral valve pathology reproducible. The training of young surgeons in a stepwise fashion in high-volume centers will help to avoid the complications encountered during the introduction of this technology.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  28; 35; MR; MV; TEE; mitral regurgitation; mitral valve; transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24199760     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  20 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair: a single-center experience in Korea.

Authors:  Ho Jin Kim; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Videoscope-assisted cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Kuan-Ming Chiu; Robert Jeen-Chen Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Technical aspects of robotic posterior mitral valve leaflet repair.

Authors:  Hoda Javadikasgari; Rakesh M Suri; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Stephanie Mick; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

4.  Robotic surgery is the optimal approach for mitral surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Ashleigh L Clark; Rakesh M Suri
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

5.  A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Matthew G Mullen; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood; Marc R Katz; Mohammed A Quader; Andy C Kiser; Alan M Speir; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Is minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery the new benchmark for treating mitral valve disease?

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

7.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: current limitations and future directions.

Authors:  A Marc Gillinov; Rakesh Suri; Stephanie Mick; Tomislav Mihaljevic
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

Review 8.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: overview, methodology, results, and perspective.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-11

Review 9.  Mitral valve repair over five decades.

Authors:  Jerome Jouan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

10.  How has robotic repair changed the landscape of mitral valve surgery?

Authors:  Amit K Taggarse; Rakesh M Suri; Richard C Daly
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.