| Literature DB >> 24198573 |
Ramon Balius1, Carles Pedret, Laura Pacheco, Josep Antoni Gutierrez, Joan Vives, Jaume Escoda.
Abstract
Muscle injuries generally occur in two-joint muscles with a high percentage of type II fibers during the performance of eccentric activity. Some muscle injuries, such as those located in the adductor longus, a monoarticular muscle, as well as rectus abdominis do not fully comply with these requirements. This study examines five cases of elite handball players with ruptured rectus abdominals. Sonographically, lesions in rectus abdominis are shown as a disruption of the fibrillar pattern with a hematic suffusion that invades the entire lesion. In some of the cases, the ultrasound study was complemented with a MRI. A unified rehabilitation protocol was applied and the return to play time of each handball player ranged between 16 and 22 days, with an average of 18.2 days. Follow-up at 15 months showed no evidence of re-injury or residual discomfort and all of them are playing at their highest level. The aim of this study was to illustrate a feature of handball injury that, as in tennis and volleyball, is uncommon and so far has not been specifically reported. The phenomenon of contralateral abdominal hypertrophy in handball appears in the dominant arm as in tennis and volleyball.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; handball; muscle injury; rectus abdominis; sonography
Year: 2011 PMID: 24198573 PMCID: PMC3781885 DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S17504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access J Sports Med ISSN: 1179-1543
Figure 116-year-old elite male handball player (case 2). Ultrasound made 4 days after the lesion. (A) Panoramic view of the injury; (B) Short axis cut shows focal area of myofibril disruption of full thickness lamina of the rectus abdominis, with hyperechoic edema.
Figure 232-year-old male. (A) Axial T2 WI fat suppression (TR/TE, 5641/48); (B) coronal T2 WI (3234/75) images show posterior aspect of left rectus abdominis with focal area of hyperintensity (arrow) compatible with muscle edema, hemorrhage, and fibril disruption (partial tear).
Anteroposterior diameter comparison of dominant (D) and nondominant (ND) rectus abdominis in elite handball players
| Patient number | Age (y) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | D (mm) | ND (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 194 | 98 | 22.3 | 23.2 |
| 2 | 24 | 195 | 90 | 17.5 | 18.4 |
| 3 | 23 | 176 | 75 | 16.7 | 18.6 |
| 4 | 21 | 201 | 107 | 20.7 | 21.8 |
| 5 | 31 | 178 | 85 | 22.5 | 23.9 |
| 6 | 23 | 184 | 88 | 19.6 | 21.1 |
| 7 | 22 | 197 | 107 | 14 | 14.3 |
| 8 | 33 | 192 | 90 | 19.9 | 18.2 |
| 9 | 26 | 186 | 76 | 18.2 | 19.9 |
| 10 | 32 | 194 | 91 | 18.9 | 22.7 |
| 11 | 22 | 195 | 110 | 19.3 | 18.9 |
| 12 | 21 | 196 | 88 | 22.4 | 23.9 |
| 13 | 24 | 194 | 88 | 26.8 | 27 |
| 14 | 22 | 199 | 105 | 21.5 | 25 |
| 15 | 24 | 187 | 81 | 17.1 | 20.9 |
| 16 | 23 | 186 | 84 | 17.8 | 18.2 |
| 17 | 25 | 190 | 87 | 18.2 | 20.3 |