Literature DB >> 24198559

Revision, uptake and coding issues related to the open access Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) versions 8, 9 and 10.1.

John Orchard1, Katherine Rae, John Brooks, Martin Hägglund, Lluis Til, David Wales, Tim Wood.   

Abstract

The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) is one of the world's most commonly used systems for coding injury diagnoses in sports injury surveillance systems. Its major strengths are that it has wide usage, has codes specific to sports medicine and that it is free to use. Literature searches and stakeholder consultations were made to assess the uptake of OSICS and to develop new versions. OSICS was commonly used in the sports of football (soccer), Australian football, rugby union, cricket and tennis. It is referenced in international papers in three sports and used in four commercially available computerised injury management systems. Suggested injury categories for the major sports are presented. New versions OSICS 9 (three digit codes) and OSICS 10.1 (four digit codes) are presented. OSICS is a potentially helpful component of a comprehensive sports injury surveillance system, but many other components are required. Choices made in developing these components should ideally be agreed upon by groups of researchers in consensus statements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coding; epidemiology; sports injury classification; surveillance

Year:  2010        PMID: 24198559      PMCID: PMC3781871          DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S7715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med        ISSN: 1179-1543


Introduction

Ongoing sports injury surveillance is a fundamental pillar of sports injury prevention,1–4 in a process described originally by van Mechelen et al5 and more recently by Finch.6 It is to sports medicine what cancer registries are to oncology or traffic accident databases are to traumatology. One of the reasons why sports injury prevention has been generally elusive is that there are very few long-standing sports injury surveillance systems in the world. Many of the existing systems are funded by professional sporting competitions, as part of due diligence, but on the premise that the raison d’être for professional sport is entertainment rather than injury containment. Some of the long-standing injury surveillance systems in non-professional sport have led to successful injury prevention, such as the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) in New Zealand7–9 and the National Register of Catastrophic Spinal Injuries in the USA,10 plus the introduction of breakaway bases in some amateur baseball leagues.11 In professional sport there have been some successful reductions of specific injuries.12 An important part of injury surveillance is coding of injury diagnoses, although it is important to note that there are many other aspects to injury surveillance systems than just coding.1 The two major purposes of coding are to facilitate retrieval of records of a certain type for future analysis and to collate diagnoses into common groups to follow trends in injury incidence and prevalence13 (as per the van Mechelen paradigm5). There is a trade-off between simplicity (which assists ease of use and categorization) and a comprehensive list of codes (which improves accuracy).13,14 Only a few papers have analysed issues related to coding of sports medicine diagnoses, such as accuracy.14,15 These issues have some importance however, as they have the ability to affect the comparability and compliance of injury surveillance. The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS)13,14,16,17 is perhaps the world’s most widely used injury coding system in sports medicine. Its uptake is due to a combination of being a free-to-use system and having codes which are specific to sports medicine. OSICS was updated to version 6 in 1998, version 7 in 2000 and version 8 in 2002. In 2005, it was determined that, for some purposes, there were permanent inadequacies in a three character coding system.14 Therefore, a four character system was created in 2007.13 It was named OSICS version 10 as it was envisaged that there would still be a role for a three character system and that when OSICS 8 was updated it should be called OSICS 9. Minor updates which only change a few codes can be made, with versions progressing using a decimal point (for example this study will include OSICS version 10.1 which is only marginally different to OSICS 10). The aims of this study were to: document the extent of uptake of OSICS by major research groups in sports medicine discuss the issues and problems with implementation and coding of OSICS from experienced stakeholders, along with suggestions for how to handle conflicts present suggested standard injury categories for some of the world’s major sports where injury classification is used, and present updated versions of OSICS (version 9 and version 10.1)

Methods

The first author and creator of OSICS (John Orchard) along with the primary creator of OSICS version 10 (Katherine Rae) are in regular email contact with key stakeholders in the sports of football (soccer), Australian football, cricket, tennis and rugby union, the sports in which OSICS has primarily been used. The majority of these stakeholders are included as coauthors in this paper. In addition, programmers associated with various athlete management systems, who have installed OSICS as a freeware add-on, were consulted via email. This consultation process was fairly informal, particularly by comparison to the processes involved in updating more Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, this consultation process was the same as the process for updating OSICS versions 1 through 7. To further assess uptake of OSICS, various literature searches were performed for the expressions ‘OSICS’ and ‘Orchard codes’ (PubMed, Sport Discus, Google Scholar) as well as a citation tracker for the specific OSICS papers.13,14,16,17

Results

The following groups/sports have been identified as users of OSICS: Australian Football League injury surveillance, which has used OSICS for 18 seasons and was the original system for which the OSICS codes were designed.12,18–22 OSICS has also been used for other Australian football studies.23 Cricket Australia injury surveillance system24,25 and international consensus definitions for cricket injuries.3,4 UEFA injury surveillance system26–28 and international consensus definitions for football (soccer) injuries.1 A rugby union injury surveillance instrument,29 an international consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection for rugby union injuries2 and the England Rugby Injury and Training Audit which has used OSICS since its inception in 2002.30,31 The international consensus definitions for tennis32,33 and Tennis Australia injury surveillance system. Experts providing advice to the International Olympic Committee on injury surveillance in team sports.34 Multiple athlete management systems including Sports Injury Manager, Athletic Logic, Fairplay and Injury Tracker. OSICS version 8 has been previously identified as being superior to the ICD 10 for coding sports injury diagnoses.14 However, deficiencies in OSICS 8 led to the development of a new version of OSICS. This was labelled version 10, as it included a significant modification of the inclusion of a fourth character.13 This enabled OSICS 8 to be updated at a later date to a version 9, still using three digits only, which is presented in this paper. OSICS 10, by virtue of a greater number of codes, is able to give more comprehensive diagnostic differentiation and hence greater diagnostic accuracy than a 3 digit system.13–15 The three digit system still retains a potential advantage of having fewer choices for the user and therefore finding an applicable code from a shorter list may be easier. However, this advantage is obviously negated if the user feels that no code is correct or specific enough. In a computerised system, it is not ideal to have an unfiltered drop down list of all OSICS codes to choose between. This involves many hundreds of codes, often making it hard for the user to find the most applicable code (particularly in OSICS version 10). It is recommended that programmers include filters for any or all of body part, injury type, or keywords, which can then reduce a dropdown list of potential codes to a small number from which to choose. An ‘intelligent’ system could use keywords from a text diagnosis provided to suggest the best fit OSICS codes to form a drop down list, from which the user could choose the most appropriate code. An even more intelligent system could allow the user to expand the drop down list (if nothing suitable was suggested in the drop down list) or narrow it (if too many codes were provided to choose between). If no filtering is used, it would be recommended that the body part was chosen as the first word of the text descriptor field, which would help organise an alphabetical list of text fields (eg, calcaneus fracture, rather than fractured calcaneus). Suggested or example injury categories for some of the major sports which use OSICS are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. These vary between sports to reflect the relevance of various diagnoses. For example, abdominal (‘side’) strains are common injuries in fast bowlers in cricket, but rare injuries in most other sports. Stingers or burners (cervical nerve root compression injuries) are common injuries in rugby union but again uncommon in other sports. These injury categories should probably be further refined by consensus groups within the sport, hence are listed as suggested rather than recommended at this stage. Some injury categories need to be separated depending on the injury definition in a sport. For example, in the football codes, head and facial lacerations are common enough to warrant a separate injury category if the injury definition is based on medical treatment. However, if the injury definition is based on time loss (with a threshold of 24 hours or more), then head and facial lacerations probably do not warrant their own separate category, as they rarely result in time loss other than possibly on the day of occurrence. The suggested and example categories represent the bias of the primary author and are not necessarily the preferences of the other authors in their particular sports. They have been included because of the presence of injury category code numbers for OSICS 9 in the Appendix.
Table 1

Suggested global injuries category for merging of OSICS codes

Region IDRegionInjcat IDInjury category
1Head and neck1Head and neck soft tissue trauma
3Eye injuries
5Concussion
6Facial bone fractures
9Other head organ damage
11Skull and neck fractures
12Neck neurological injuries
17Jaw sprains
18Neck muscle strains
19Neck sprains
2Shoulder/arm/elbow21Shoulder sprains and dislocations
22A-C (acromioclavicular) joint
23Fractured clavicles
24Shoulder tendon injuries
25Other arm and elbow fractures
26Shoulder and arm stress fractures
29Shoulder and arm neurovascular
30Upper arm muscle strains
32Shoulder and arm soft tissue trauma
33Elbow sprains or joint injuries
34Elbow tendon injuries
3Forearm/wrist/hand40Forearm fractures
41Scaphoid fractures
44Other wrist and hand fractures
45Forearm and hand stress fractures
46Forearm and hand soft tissue trauma
47Forearm and hand neurovascular
48Hand tendon injuries
49Wrist and hand sprains and dislocations
4Trunk/back/buttock51Rib fractures
52Rib and costochondral bruising
53S/C joint sprains
54Abdominal and thoracic organ damage
55Lumbar and thoracic fractures
56Rib stress fractures
57Pneumothorax
5Groin/hip/thigh59Lumbar and thoracic soft tissue trauma
60Buttock injuries
61Lumbar and thoracic sprains
62Lumbar stress fractures
63Trunk muscle strains
72Hip joint injuries
73Groin and thigh stress fractures
74Hip and groin contusions
75Groin strain injuries
76Pelvic and thigh fractures
77Groin and thigh neurovascular
81Hamstring strains
82Quadriceps strains
83Thigh contusions
6Knee91Knee – ACL (anterior cruciate ligament)
92Knee – MCL (medial ligament)
93Knee – PCL (posterior cruciate ligament)
94Knee cartilage injuries
95Knee and patellar tendon injuries
96Other knee sprains
97Patella instability
98Patella stress fractures
99Knee and patella fractures
100Knee contusions
7Lower leg/foot/ankle101Leg fractures
102Leg stress fractures
103Calf strains
104Leg and foot soft tissue trauma
105Shin soreness
106Achilles tendon
107Ankle sprains and joint injuries
111Foot bone fractures
112Foot stress fractures
113Foot and ankle neurovascular
118Other shin and foot stress injuries
119Foot sprains
8Medical illness121Illness, general
122Environment-related illness
Table 2

Suggested specific injury categories for Australian football and cricket, further merged from the categories in Table 1

Injcat IDAustralian football categoryCricket category
1Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
3Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
5ConcussionOther head and neck injuries
6Facial fracturesFacial fractures
9Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
11Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
12Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
17Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
18Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
19Neck sprainsOther head and neck injuries
21Shoulder sprains and dislocationsOther shoulder injuries
22A/C joint injuriesOther shoulder injuries
23Fractured claviclesShoulder/arm/elbow fractures
24Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesShoulder/elbow tendon injuries
25Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesShoulder/arm/elbow fractures
26Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesShoulder/arm/elbow fractures
29Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder injuries
30Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
32Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder injuries
33Elbow sprains or joint injuriesElbow sprains or joint injuries
34Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesShoulder/elbow tendon injuries
40Forearm/wrist/hand fracturesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
41Forearm/wrist/hand fracturesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
44Forearm/wrist/hand fracturesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
45Forearm/wrist/hand fracturesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
46Other hand/forearm/wrist injuriesOther wrist/hand injuries
47Other hand/forearm/wrist injuriesOther wrist/hand injuries
48Other hand/forearm/wrist injuriesOther wrist/hand injuries
49Other hand/forearm/wrist injuriesOther wrist/hand injuries
51Rib and chest wall injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
52Rib and chest wall injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
53Rib and chest wall injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
54Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
55Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
56Rib and chest wall injuriesSide and abdominal strains
57Rib and chest wall injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
59Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
60Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
61Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
62Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesLumbar stress fractures
63Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesSide and abdominal strains
72Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
73Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
74Thigh and hip contusionsOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
75Groin strains and osteitis pubisGroin strains and osteitis pubis
76Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
77Groin strains and osteitis pubisOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
81Hamstring strainsHamstring strains
82Quadriceps strainsQuadriceps strains
83Thigh and hip contusionsOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
91Knee ACLKnee ligament injuries
92Knee MCLKnee ligament injuries
93Knee PCLKnee ligament injuries
94Knee cartilageKnee cartilage
95Knee and patella tendon injuriesOther knee injuries
96Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
97Patella injuriesOther knee injuries
98Patella injuriesOther knee injuries
99Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
100Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
101Leg and foot fracturesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
102Lower leg/foot stress fracturesLower leg/foot stress fractures
103Calf strainsCalf strains
104Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
105Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
106Achilles tendon injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
107Ankle sprains or joint injuriesAnkle sprains or joint injuries
111Leg and foot fracturesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
112Lower leg/foot stress fracturesLower leg/foot stress fractures
113Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
118Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
119Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
121Medical illnessesMedical illnesses
122Medical illnessesEnvironment-related illness
Table 3

Example specific injury categories for football (soccer) and rugby union, further merged from the categories in Table 1

Injcat IDSoccer categoryRugby union category
1Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
3Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
5ConcussionConcussion
6Facial fracturesFacial fractures
9Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
11Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
12Other head and neck injuriesNeck stingers/burners
17Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
18Other head and neck injuriesOther head and neck injuries
19Other head and neck injuriesNeck sprains
21Shoulder sprains and dislocationsShoulder sprains and dislocations
22A/C joint injuriesA/C joint injuries
23Fractured claviclesFractured clavicles
24Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
25Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
26Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
29Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
30Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
32Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
33Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesElbow sprains or joint injuries
34Other shoulder/arm/elbow injuriesOther shoulder/arm/elbow injuries
40Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
41Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
44Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
45Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesForearm/wrist/hand fractures
46Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesOther hand/forearm/wrist injuries
47Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesOther hand/forearm/wrist injuries
48Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesOther hand/forearm/wrist injuries
49Forearm/wrist/hand injuriesOther hand/forearm/wrist injuries
51Rib and chest wall injuriesRib and chest wall injuries
52Rib and chest wall injuriesRib and chest wall injuries
53Rib and chest wall injuriesRib and chest wall injuries
54Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
55Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesLumbar and thoracic spine injuries
56Rib and chest wall injuriesRib and chest wall injuries
57Rib and chest wall injuriesRib and chest wall injuries
59Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesLumbar and thoracic spine injuries
60Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
61Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesLumbar and thoracic spine injuries
62Lumbar and thoracic spine injuriesLumbar and thoracic spine injuries
63Other buttock/back/trunk injuriesOther buttock/back/trunk injuries
72Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
73Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
74Thigh and hip contusionsThigh and hip contusions
75Groin strains and osteitis pubisGroin strains and osteitis pubis
76Other hip/groin/thigh injuriesOther hip/groin/thigh injuries
77Groin strains and osteitis pubisGroin strains and osteitis pubis
81Hamstring strainsHamstring strains
82Quadriceps strainsQuadriceps strains
83Thigh and hip contusionsThigh and hip contusions
91Knee ACLKnee ACL
92Knee MCLKnee MCL
93Knee PCLKnee PCL
94Knee cartilageKnee cartilage
95Knee and patella tendon injuriesKnee and patella tendon injuries
96Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
97Patella injuriesPatella injuries
98Patella injuriesPatella injuries
99Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
100Other knee injuriesOther knee injuries
101Leg and foot fracturesLeg and foot fractures
102Lower leg/foot stress fracturesLower leg/foot stress fractures
103Calf strainsCalf strains
104Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
105Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
106Achilles tendon injuriesAchilles tendon injuries
107Ankle sprains or joint injuriesAnkle sprains or joint injuries
111Leg and foot fracturesLeg and foot fractures
112Lower leg/foot stress fracturesLower leg/foot stress fractures
113Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
118Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
119Other leg/foot/ankle injuriesOther leg/foot/ankle injuries
121Medical illnessesMedical illnesses
122Medical illnessesMedical illnesses
Some sports/users may prefer not to combine body parts and injury types in the same table. For example, in the soccer1 and tennis32,33 consensus statements the groups recommended tabulating separately by body area and then by injury type. It is easier (but still not straightforward) to determine the boundary between categories when choosing a ‘body part’ or ‘injury type’ list, compared to a more global injury category list. For example, should groin/hip/thigh be a body part category or separated into groin/hip and thigh? And if it is separated, are all adductor muscle strains to be included in the groin section, or does it depend on whether they are proximal (groin) or distal (thigh)? It is useful to be able to read, say, the rate of ‘muscle strains’ from a surveillance system and also the rate of ‘thigh injuries’. Where the consensus statements currently recommend tabulating separately by body part and by injury type then obviously this format is recommended. However, many readers of reports will specifically want to know the rate of common injuries, such as ‘hamstring injuries’ for example. This rate is not clear if only categorization is made by body part and then by injury type. If a hybrid table is formed (as has been attempted in Tables 2 and 3) there needs to be agreement on which injuries warrant their own separate category (balanced against the need to keep the table a reasonable size). Depending on how common hamstring injuries are in a sport, they can form their own separate injury category or can be combined with quadriceps strains (to form a category of ‘hamstring and thigh muscle strains’) or with groin and quadriceps muscle strains (to form a category of ‘upper leg muscle strains’). Because of the multiple approaches of tabulating categories, it is suggested that each sport includes this issue as part of future consensus statements or consensus statement updates. New lists of injury codes for versions 9 (three digit codes) and 10.1 (four digit codes) are available from http://injuryupdate.com.au/research/OSICS.htm. OSICS version 10 has recently been translated into Spanish (http://www.apunts.org/ficheros/apunts/videos/ocsis10-es.xls) and Catalan,35 with further versions possible in other languages.

Discussion

This paper presents for the first time OSICS version 9, which is essentially the first major modification of OSICS 8, retaining the three code system. It is ideal for use in an injury management system where easy and simple coding is preferred. This is most likely to be the case where the main purpose of coding is to assist grouping into larger injury categories for presentation in reports or scientific papers. Where the aims of an injury surveillance system also involve an archiving function, to be able to retrieve records with greater specificity, OSICS version 10 is preferred. This study also presents version 10.1, which is very similar to the original version 10 but contains a few minor modifications (hence does not qualify as a major rewrite, which may one day be done with a version 11). One of the major advantages of OSICS is the fact that the system is available worldwide for free use. This fact alone is a good explanation for the popularity and uptake of the system. However, the fact that no income is earned by the system means that updates and product support are below an ideal level. Most users would probably prefer suboptimal support and an ongoing free system compared to a product licence with a greater level of support for queries and system implementation. Ideally, in the future, a major update of OSICS (say to version 11) would involve a formal consultative process in a similar fashion to updates of the ICD. Part of the process could include, for example, multiple expert and novice users attempting to code a long list of provided text diagnoses. Where there was broad agreement amongst the users, no changes to codes would be deemed necessary. Where users were in disagreement or unable to agree on a suitable OSICS code, a new or modified code could be established for the new version. Such a process would be time- and resource-consuming and would require funding. If a private body provided the funding for such a process, it may require assignment of copyright in the new system in return. This would obviously improve the system, but potentially at a cost of the new version being freely available for use. It is important to note that OSICS is not a comprehensive injury surveillance system itself, only a system for coding major diagnoses. Diagnosis and injury code are important fields in a sports injury database or injury surveillance system.36 Other data which are also relevant are injury side, injury mechanism (eg, noncontact vs contact), date of onset, date of return (severity), activity of onset (eg, match play, training, insidious onset) and exposure time. Another dilemma which users and coordinators of injury surveillance systems must address is whether to allow multiple injury codes/diagnoses for single events. For example, a valgus mechanism knee injury is a single event but may be associated with a combination of injuries (such as medial collateral ligament (MCL) + anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) sprains). This could be coded as a single injury, with deference given to the more significant of the two diagnoses (ie, ACL injury is of more significance than MCL injury). Alternatively it could be coded as two different injuries with the same mechanism and date/time of onset. It is also possible in an injury surveillance system for a single injury event to contain multiple injury codes as part of the one ‘injury’ (ie, combined ACL/MCL diagnosis). Because there are so many similar dilemmas when conducting injury surveillance, it is recommended that for sports where many different groups are undertaking injury surveillance that consensus papers be developed.1–4 With respect to use of OSICS, for those consensus groups that decide to recommend it, there would be a lot of benefit in suggesting broad injury categories for tabulation (cricket consensus statement paper3,4,37). The more common ground there is between various research groups in their methodology, the more valid are comparisons between studies undertaken by different author groups.
  28 in total

1.  Validation of an instrument for injury data collection in rugby union.

Authors:  A McManus
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Injuries in Australian cricket at first class level 1995/1996 to 2000/2001.

Authors:  J Orchard; T James; E Alcott; S Carter; P Farhart
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Methods for injury surveillance in international cricket.

Authors:  J Orchard; D Newman; R Stretch; W Frost; A Mansingh; A Leipus
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 4.  Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries.

Authors:  C W Fuller; J Ekstrand; A Junge; T E Andersen; R Bahr; J Dvorak; M Hägglund; P McCrory; W H Meeuwisse
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Injuries to elite male cricketers in Australia over a 10-year period.

Authors:  John W Orchard; Trefor James; Marc R Portus
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.319

6.  Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study.

Authors:  Simon M Gianotti; Stephen W Marshall; Patria A Hume; Lorna Bunt
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 7.  Methods for epidemiological study of injuries to professional football players: developing the UEFA model.

Authors:  M Hägglund; M Waldén; R Bahr; J Ekstrand
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Consensus statement on epidemiological studies of medical conditions in tennis, April 2009.

Authors:  B M Pluim; C W Fuller; M E Batt; L Chase; B Hainline; S Miller; B Montalvan; P Renström; K A Stroia; K Weber; T O Wood
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Decreased incidence of knee posterior cruciate ligament injury in Australian Football League after ruck rule change.

Authors:  J W Orchard; H Seward
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study.

Authors:  J Ekstrand; M Hägglund; M Waldén
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  16 in total

1.  Can a Specific Neck Strengthening Program Decrease Cervical Spine Injuries in a Men's Professional Rugby Union Team? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Naish; Angus Burnett; Sally Burrows; Warren Andrews; Brendyn Appleby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  What is a sports injury?

Authors:  Toomas Timpka; Jenny Jacobsson; Jerome Bickenbach; Caroline F Finch; Joakim Ekberg; Lennart Nordenfelt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  An Updated Subsequent Injury Categorisation Model (SIC-2.0): Data-Driven Categorisation of Subsequent Injuries in Sport.

Authors:  Liam A Toohey; Michael K Drew; Lauren V Fortington; Caroline F Finch; Jill L Cook
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Incidence of Tendinopathy in Team Sports in a Multidisciplinary Sports Club Over 8 Seasons.

Authors:  Daniel Florit; Carles Pedret; Martí Casals; Peter Malliaras; Dai Sugimoto; Gil Rodas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Designing an electronic personal health record for professional Iranian athletes.

Authors:  Robab Abdolkhani; Farzin Halabchi; Reza Safdari; Hossein Dargahi; Kamran Shadanfar
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-10

6.  A systematic approach to the characterisation of human impact injury scenarios in sport.

Authors:  Thomas Payne; Séan Mitchell; Ben Halkon; Richard Bibb
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2016-02-29

7.  Orchard Sports Injury Classification System 10.1 Plus: An End-User Study.

Authors:  Ashley K Crossway; Kenneth E Games; Lindsey E Eberman; Neil Fleming
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Coding OSICS sports injury diagnoses in epidemiological studies: does the background of the coder matter?

Authors:  Caroline F Finch; John W Orchard; Dara M Twomey; Muhammad Saad Saleem; Christina L Ekegren; David G Lloyd; Bruce C Elliott
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Collecting Health and Exposure Data in Australian Olympic Combat Sports: Feasibility Study Utilizing an Electronic System.

Authors:  Sally Bromley; Michael Drew; Scott Talpey; Andrew McIntosh; Caroline Finch
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2018-10-09

10.  Temporal Trends and Severity in Injury and Illness Incidence in the National Basketball Association Over 11 Seasons.

Authors:  Garrett S Bullock; Tyler Ferguson; Jake Vaughan; Desiree Gillespie; Gary Collins; Stefan Kluzek
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.