Literature DB >> 24198380

When and why noise correlations are important in neural decoding.

Hugo Gabriel Eyherabide1, Inés Samengo.   

Abstract

Information may be encoded both in the individual activity of neurons and in the correlations between their activities. Understanding whether knowledge of noise correlations is required to decode all the encoded information is fundamental for constructing computational models, brain-machine interfaces, and neuroprosthetics. If correlations can be ignored with tolerable losses of information, the readout of neural signals is simplified dramatically. To that end, previous studies have constructed decoders assuming that neurons fire independently and then derived bounds for the information that is lost. However, here we show that previous bounds were not tight and overestimated the importance of noise correlations. In this study, we quantify the exact loss of information induced by ignoring noise correlations and show why previous estimations were not tight. Further, by studying the elementary parts of the decoding process, we determine when and why information is lost on a single-response basis. We introduce the minimum decoding error to assess the distinctive role of noise correlations under natural conditions. We conclude that all of the encoded information can be decoded without knowledge of noise correlations in many more situations than previously thought.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24198380      PMCID: PMC6618421          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0357-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  10 in total

1.  A Distributed Neural Code in the Dentate Gyrus and in CA1.

Authors:  Fabio Stefanini; Lyudmila Kushnir; Jessica C Jimenez; Joshua H Jennings; Nicholas I Woods; Garret D Stuber; Mazen A Kheirbek; René Hen; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  From Parametric Representation to Dynamical System: Shifting Views of the Motor Cortex in Motor Control.

Authors:  Tianwei Wang; Yun Chen; He Cui
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.271

3.  Correlated activity supports efficient cortical processing.

Authors:  Chou P Hung; Ding Cui; Yueh-Peng Chen; Chia-Pei Lin; Matthew R Levine
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Independent theta phase coding accounts for CA1 population sequences and enables flexible remapping.

Authors:  Angus Chadwick; Mark C W van Rossum; Matthew F Nolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Cortical Variability and Challenges for Modeling Approaches.

Authors:  Emili Balaguer-Ballester
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  Stability of spontaneous, correlated activity in mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Richard F Betzel; Katherine C Wood; Christopher Angeloni; Maria Neimark Geffen; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Neural Code in the Rodent Temporal Lobe.

Authors:  Melisa B Maidana Capitán; Emilio Kropff; Inés Samengo
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Assessing the Relevance of Specific Response Features in the Neural Code.

Authors:  Hugo Gabriel Eyherabide; Inés Samengo
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.524

9.  Network Anisotropy Trumps Noise for Efficient Object Coding in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Yueh-Peng Chen; Chia-Pei Lin; Yu-Chun Hsu; Chou P Hung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Integrated open-source software for multiscale electrophysiology.

Authors:  Konstantinos Nasiotis; Martin Cousineau; François Tadel; Adrien Peyrache; Richard M Leahy; Christopher C Pack; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.444

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.