Literature DB >> 24198342

EMG-triggered electrical stimulation is a feasible intervention to apply to multiple arm muscles in people early after stroke, but does not improve strength and activity more than usual therapy: a randomized feasibility trial.

Simone Dorsch1, Louise Ada, Colleen G Canning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether EMG-triggered electrical stimulation applied to multiple muscles daily is a feasible intervention and to determine its effect on strength and activity in very weak stroke patients.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial with blinded assessment.
SETTING: Metropolitan mixed acute and rehabilitation units. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three people within four weeks of a stroke with less than Grade 3 strength in three out of four muscle groups (shoulder flexors, elbow extensors, wrist and finger extensors and thumb abductors) of the affected arm.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to receive EMG-triggered electrical stimulation to the four muscle groups of the affected arm plus usual therapy five times a week for four weeks, or usual therapy only. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility of the intervention was measured by examining compliance with the trial protocol. Strength was measured using manual muscle testing summed across muscle groups (0-20). Activity was measured using the Motor Assessment Scale, summed upper limb items (0-18).
RESULTS: The experimental group received 87% of the intervention. Following the intervention period, there was no difference between the groups for strength (mean between-group difference, 0 out of 20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3 to 3, p = 0.91) or activity (mean between-group difference 1 out of 18, 95% CI -2 to 4, p = 0.44).
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to apply EMG-triggered electrical stimulation to multiple muscles of the upper limb in very weak people early after stroke. However, it does not appear to improve strength or activity beyond usual arm therapy that contains strengthening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity limitation; electrical stimulation; randomized controlled trial; strength training; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24198342     DOI: 10.1177/0269215513510011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  5 in total

1.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Development of an EMG-Controlled Serious Game for Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghassemi; Kristen Triandafilou; Alex Barry; Mary Ellen Stoykov; Elliot Roth; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Derek G Kamper; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Arm rehabilitation in post stroke subjects: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of myoelectrically driven FES applied in a task-oriented approach.

Authors:  Johanna Jonsdottir; Rune Thorsen; Irene Aprile; Silvia Galeri; Giovanna Spannocchi; Ettore Beghi; Elisa Bianchi; Angelo Montesano; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke.

Authors:  Martina Coscia; Maximilian J Wessel; Ujwal Chaudary; José Del R Millán; Silvestro Micera; Adrian Guggisberg; Philippe Vuadens; John Donoghue; Niels Birbaumer; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  A Literature Review of High-Tech Physiotherapy Interventions in the Elderly with Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Marios Spanakis; Ioanna Xylouri; Evridiki Patelarou; Athina Patelarou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.