Literature DB >> 24198269

Three floral volatiles contribute to differential pollinator attraction in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Kelsey J R P Byers1, H D Bradshaw, Jeffrey A Riffell.   

Abstract

Flowering plants employ a wide variety of signals, including scent, to attract the attention of pollinators. In this study we investigated the role of floral scent in mediating differential attraction between two species of monkeyflowers (Mimulus) reproductively isolated by pollinator preference. The emission rate and chemical identity of floral volatiles differ between the bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated M. cardinalis. Mimulus lewisii flowers produce an array of volatiles dominated by d-limonene, β-myrcene and E-β-ocimene. Of these three monoterpenes, M. cardinalis flowers produce only d-limonene, released at just 0.9% the rate of M. lewisii flowers. Using the Bombus vosnesenskii bumblebee, an important pollinator of M. lewisii, we conducted simultaneous gas chromatography with extracellular recordings in the bumblebee antennal lobe. Results from these experiments revealed that these three monoterpenes evoke significant neural responses, and that a synthetic mixture of the three volatiles evokes the same responses as the natural scent. Furthermore, the neural population shows enhanced responses to the M. lewisii scent over the scent of M. cardinalis. This neural response is reflected in behavior; in two-choice assays, bumblebees investigate artificial flowers scented with M. lewisii more frequently than ones scented with M. cardinalis, and in synthetic mixtures the three monoterpenes are necessary and sufficient to recapitulate responses to the natural scent of M. lewisii. In this system, floral scent alone is sufficient to elicit differential visitation by bumblebees, implying a strong role of scent in the maintenance of reproductive isolation between M. lewisii and M. cardinalis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antennal lobe; Floral scent; Insect behavior; Olfaction; Speciation; Terpene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24198269      PMCID: PMC3922836          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.092213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  41 in total

1.  Floral and vegetative cues in oil-secreting and non-oil-secreting Lysimachia species.

Authors:  I Schäffler; F Balao; S Dötterl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene.

Authors:  M O Waelti; J K Muhlemann; A Widmer; F P Schiestl
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Amy Lutmerding; Natalia Dudareva; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Neural basis of a pollinator's buffet: olfactory specialization and learning in Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; Hong Lei; Leif Abrell; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evolution of floral scent in Clarkia: novel patterns of S-linalool synthase gene expression in the C. breweri flower.

Authors:  N Dudareva; L Cseke; V M Blanc; E Pichersky
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Floral scents affect reproductive success in fly-pollinated Alocasia odora (Araceae).

Authors:  Takashi Miyake; Masako Yafuso
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant-derived volatile mixtures.

Authors:  A J Najar-Rodriguez; C G Galizia; J Stierle; S Dorn
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate.

Authors:  George Aldridge; Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  D W Schemske; H D Bradshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  To flourish or perish: evolutionary TRiPs into the sensory biology of plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Justyna B Startek; Thomas Voets; Karel Talavera
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Scent matters: differential contribution of scent to insect response in flowers with insect vs. wind pollination traits.

Authors:  Theresa N Wang; Marie R Clifford; Jesús Martínez-Gómez; Jens C Johnson; Jeffrey A Riffell; Verónica S Di Stilio
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Floral volatile alleles can contribute to pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  Kelsey J R P Byers; James P Vela; Foen Peng; Jeffrey A Riffell; Harvey D Bradshaw
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Diel pattern of floral scent emission matches the relative importance of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in populations of Gymnadenia conopsea.

Authors:  Elodie Chapurlat; Joseph Anderson; Jon Ågren; Magne Friberg; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.

Authors:  Gérard Coureaud; Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  A Cytosol-Localized Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase from Lithospermum erythrorhizon and Its Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  Hayato Ueoka; Kanako Sasaki; Tatsuya Miyawaki; Takuji Ichino; Kanade Tatsumi; Shiro Suzuki; Hirobumi Yamamoto; Nozomu Sakurai; Hideyuki Suzuki; Daisuke Shibata; Kazufumi Yazaki
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Variation in reward quality and pollinator attraction: the consumer does not always get it right.

Authors:  David E Carr; Ariela I Haber; Kathryn A LeCroy; De'Ashia E Lee; Rosabeth I Link
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  How scent and nectar influence floral antagonists and mutualists.

Authors:  Danny Kessler; Mario Kallenbach; Celia Diezel; Eva Rothe; Mark Murdock; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Biochemistry of Terpenes and Recent Advances in Plant Protection.

Authors:  Vincent Ninkuu; Lin Zhang; Jianpei Yan; Zhenchao Fu; Tengfeng Yang; Hongmei Zeng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Effects of Floral Scents and Their Dietary Experiences on the Feeding Preference in the Blowfly, Phormia regina.

Authors:  Toru Maeda; Miwako Tamotsu; Ryohei Yamaoka; Mamiko Ozaki
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.