Literature DB >> 24198097

Azole-based chemoprophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in paediatric patients with acute leukaemia: an internal audit.

Sara Yunus1, Stephanie Pieper, Hedwig Kolve, Grazyna Goletz, Heribert Jürgens, Andreas H Groll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and recurrent acute leukaemias (RALs) are at high risk of life-threatening invasive fungal infections (IFIs). We analysed implementation, safety and efficacy of a standard operating procedure for oral, azole-based, mould-active antifungal prophylaxis.
METHODS: Patients with AML and RALs aged ≥13 years received 200 mg of posaconazole three times daily and patients aged 2-12 years received 200 mg of voriconazole two times daily from the completion of chemotherapy until haematopoietic recovery. Algorithms for fever or focal findings in all patients with haematological malignancies included blood cultures, high-resolution CT and other appropriate imaging, serial serum galactomannan, invasive diagnostics and pre-emptive therapy with change in class if on antifungal medication.
RESULTS: From 2006 to 2010, 40 patients (0.8-17 years; 21 males) with newly diagnosed AML (n = 31) or RAL (n = 9) were admitted, of whom 36 received a total of 149 courses of chemotherapy (reasons for exclusion: contraindications and early death ≤3 days). Azole prophylaxis was given in 87.2% (n = 130/149) of episodes. Pre-emptive antifungal therapy for pulmonary infiltrates was initiated in 5/36 (13.9%) patients or 6/130 (4.6%) episodes for a duration of 3-22 days. No proven or probable IFIs occurred. Adverse events (AEs) were common but mostly low grade and reversible. Three courses (2.3%) were discontinued due to AEs. In simultaneously admitted new patients with acute lymphatic leukaemia (ALL; n = 101) and paediatric lymphomas (n = 29) not receiving standard antifungal prophylaxis, proven/probable IFIs occurred in 4 patients with ALL (4.0%) and 7/130 patients (5.4%) received pre-emptive therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Azole-based, mould-active antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk paediatric patients with AML and RALs was satisfactorily implemented, well tolerated and effective. The low rate of IFIs in patients with ALL/lymphoma supports the lack of a general indication for prophylaxis in this population in the presence of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; children; mycoses; posaconazole; prevention; voriconazole

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24198097     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Infection prevention requirements for the medical care of immunosuppressed patients: recommendations of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute.

Authors: 
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Pinki Mishra; Narendra Agrawal; Dinesh Bhurani; Nidhi Bharal Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 3.  Prevention of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients: the role of delayed-release posaconazole.

Authors:  Ahmet Soysal
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole in pediatric patients with neutropenia.

Authors:  M Döring; M Eikemeier; K M Cabanillas Stanchi; U Hartmann; M Ebinger; C-P Schwarze; A Schulz; R Handgretinger; I Müller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Prospective surveillance of colonization and disease by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a European pediatric cancer center.

Authors:  Miriam A Füller; Stefanie Kampmeier; Anna M Wübbolding; Judith Grönefeld; Almut Kremer; Andreas H Groll
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.359

6. 

Authors: 
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.