Literature DB >> 24197840

A hierarchical approach for desertification assessment.

G Bergkamp1.   

Abstract

Environmental systems are complex and multi-scaled open systems. To understand land degradation, one has to consider the interactions between landscape patterns and environmental processes at different scales. Patterns and processes in the landscape are perceived to be organized in nested hierarchical structures. To study land degradation in this context, a coupled top-bottom/bottom-up approach was developed. The top-bottom landscape analysis is aimed at identifying landscape systems at different scales. The bottom-up analysis focuses on system dynamics at finer scales. Applied in a study in central Spain, the approach is aimed at understanding the functional differences between three types of degraded seminatural slopes at different scales. Six levels of organization were distinguished: ped-level, terracette-level, hummock-level, slope part-level, slope level, and watershed level. Properties that characterize these levels were selected for different disciplines. The bottom-up analysis focused on water movement at different spatial scales. Successfully applying this approach revealed the importance for land degradation of the close linkage between spatial patterns and hydrological processes at different spatial scales. Identifying constraining and dynamic indicators related to water conservation at different scales can be useful for assessing desertification.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24197840     DOI: 10.1007/BF00546880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Time, structure, and fluctuations.

Authors:  I Prigogine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The theory of open systems in physics and biology.

Authors:  L VON BERTALANFFY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1950-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability.

Authors:  M R Gardner; W R Ashby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.

Authors:  H E Wright
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.