Literature DB >> 24197716

Not all risks are equal: the risk taking inventory for high-risk sports.

Tim Woodman1, Matt Barlow, Comille Bandura, Miles Hill, Dominika Kupciw, Alexandra Macgregor.   

Abstract

Although high-risk sport participants are typically considered a homogenous risk-taking population, attitudes to risk within the high-risk domain can vary considerably. As no validated measure allows researchers to assess risk taking within this domain, we validated the Risk Taking Inventory (RTI) for high-risk sport across four studies. The RTI comprises seven items across two factors: deliberate risk taking and precautionary behaviors. In Study 1 (n = 341), the inventory was refined and tested via a confirmatory factor analysis used in an exploratory fashion. The subsequent three studies confirmed the RTI's good model-data fit via three further separate confirmatory factor analyses. In Study 2 (n = 518) and in Study 3 (n = 290), concurrent validity was also confirmed via associations with other related traits (sensation seeking, behavioral activation, behavioral inhibition, impulsivity, self-esteem, extraversion, and conscientiousness). In Study 4 (n = 365), predictive validity was confirmed via associations with mean accidents and mean close calls in the high-risk domain. Finally, in Study 4, the self-report version of the inventory was significantly associated with an informant version of the inventory. The measure will allow researchers and practitioners to investigate risk taking as a variable that is conceptually distinct from participation in a high-risk sport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24197716     DOI: 10.1123/jsep.35.5.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol        ISSN: 0895-2779            Impact factor:   3.016


  8 in total

1.  Does Age Matter? A Qualitative Comparison of Motives and Aspects of Risk in Adolescent and Adult Freeriders.

Authors:  Anika Frühauf; Julian Zenzmaier; Martin Kopp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Why do we climb mountains? An exploration of features of behavioural addiction in mountaineering and the association with stress-related psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Leonie Habelt; Georg Kemmler; Michaela Defrancesco; Bianca Spanier; Peter Henningsen; Martin Halle; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Katharina Hüfner
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.760

3.  Recreational climbers are more conscientious than recreational athletes-a case control study.

Authors:  Gino Steinmetz; Mara Assman; Jan Hubert; Dominik Saul
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  The Effect of Head-to-Head Competition on Behavioural Thermoregulation, Thermophysiological Strain and Performance During Exercise in the Heat.

Authors:  Jo Corbett; Danny K White; Martin J Barwood; Christopher R D Wagstaff; Michael J Tipton; Terry McMorris; Joseph T Costello
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Understanding Action and Adventure Sports Participation-An Ecological Dynamics Perspective.

Authors:  Tuomas Immonen; Eric Brymer; Dominic Orth; Keith Davids; Francesco Feletti; Jarmo Liukkonen; Timo Jaakkola
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  A Qualitative Approach on Motives and Aspects of Risks in Freeriding.

Authors:  Anika Frühauf; Will A S Hardy; Daniel Pfoestl; Franz-Georg Hoellen; Martin Kopp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-14

7.  Risk-taking behavior, the second-to-fourth digit ratio and psychological features in a sample of cavers.

Authors:  Sergio Rinella; Andrea Buscemi; Simona Massimino; Vincenzo Perciavalle; Marta Maria Tortorici; Daria Ghiunè Tomaselli; Valentina Perciavalle; Donatella Di Corrado; Marinella Coco
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  An Ecological Dynamics Approach to Understanding Human-Environment Interactions in the Adventure Sport Context-Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Tuomas Immonen; Eric Brymer; Keith Davids; Timo Jaakkola
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.