Literature DB >> 24197659

Tumor immune subtypes distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications in breast cancer patients.

Esther M de Kruijf1, Charla C Engels, Willemien van de Water, Esther Bastiaannet, Vincent T H B M Smit, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Gerrit Jan Liefers, Peter J K Kuppen.   

Abstract

There is strong evidence that the host's cellular immune response is linked to tumor progression, however its impact on patient outcome in breast cancer is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to define tumor immune subtypes, focusing on cellular immune responses and investigate their prognostic effect in breast cancer patients. Our training (n = 440) and validation cohort (n = 382) consisted of all early breast cancer patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1996. Tumor tissue sections were immunohistochemically stained for CD8 (CTL) and PEN5 (NK cells). Tumor expression of classical and non-classical human leukocyte antigen class I, and tumor-infiltrating Tregs were previously determined. Tumor immune subtypes were constructed based on quantification of these markers and biological rationale. High, intermediate, and low immune susceptible tumor immune subtypes were found, respectively, in 16, 63, and 20 % of patients in the training cohort and 16, 71, and 13 % in the validation cohort. The subtypes showed to be statistically significant prognostic in multivariate analyses for relapse free period (RFP) [p < 0.0001, intermediate versus high: hazard ratio (HR) 1.95; low versus high HR 2.98] and relative survival (RS) (p = 0.006, intermediate versus high HR 3.84; low versus high: HR 4.26). Validation of these outcome analyses confirmed the independent prognostic associations: RFP (p = 0.025) and RS (p = 0.040). The tumor immune subtypes that we present represent a prognostic profile with solid underlying biological rationale and with high discriminative power confirmed in an independent validation cohort. Our results emphasize the importance of tumor immune surveillance in the control of tumor development and, therefore, in determining patient prognosis. Tumor immune subtype profiling is promising for prognosis prediction and the achievement of tailored treatment for breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24197659     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2752-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Immune Escape and Immune Cell Infiltration in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  André Steven; Barbara Seliger
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The prognostic and predictive value of Tregs and tumor immune subtypes in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy: a Dutch TEAM study analysis.

Authors:  C C Engels; A Charehbili; C J H van de Velde; E Bastiaannet; A Sajet; H Putter; E A van Vliet; R L P van Vlierberghe; V T H B M Smit; J M S Bartlett; C Seynaeve; G J Liefers; P J K Kuppen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Absence of gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) is associated with poor disease-free survival in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yu-Juan Xiang; Ming-Ming Guo; Cheng-Jun Zhou; Lu Liu; Bo Han; Ling-Yu Kong; Zhong-Cheng Gao; Zhong-Bing Ma; Lu Wang; Man Feng; Hai-Ying Chen; Guo-Tao Jia; De-Zong Gao; Qiang Zhang; Liang Li; Yu-Yang Li; Zhi-Gang Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High nuclear expression levels of histone-modifying enzymes LSD1, HDAC2 and SIRT1 in tumor cells correlate with decreased survival and increased relapse in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Remco S Derr; Anneke Q van Hoesel; Anne Benard; Inès J Goossens-Beumer; Anita Sajet; N Geeske Dekker-Ensink; Esther M de Kruijf; Esther Bastiaannet; Vincent T H B M Smit; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Intravital imaging reveals new ancillary mechanisms co-opted by cancer cells to drive tumor progression.

Authors:  Claire Vennin; David Herrmann; Morghan C Lucas; Paul Timpson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-05-16

6.  Differential tumor infiltration by T-cells characterizes intrinsic molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Miyan; J Schmidt-Mende; R Kiessling; I Poschke; J de Boniface
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Prognostic value of tumor-stroma ratio combined with the immune status of tumors in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  K M H Vangangelt; G W van Pelt; C C Engels; H Putter; G J Liefers; V T H B M Smit; R A E M Tollenaar; P J K Kuppen; W E Mesker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  The clinical role of the TME in solid cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas A Giraldo; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J David Peske; Yann Vano; Etienne Becht; Florent Petitprez; Pierre Validire; Alexandre Ingels; Xavier Cathelineau; Wolf Herman Fridman; Catherine Sautès-Fridman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prognostic value of HLA class I, HLA-E, HLA-G and Tregs in rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marlies S Reimers; Charla C Engels; Hein Putter; Hans Morreau; Gerrit Jan Liefers; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Immunological subtypes in breast cancer are prognostic for invasive ductal but not for invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Authors:  C C Engels; D B Y Fontein; P J K Kuppen; E M de Kruijf; V T H B M Smit; J W R Nortier; G J Liefers; C J H van de Velde; E Bastiaannet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.