Literature DB >> 24196785

Amplification of PVT-1 is involved in poor prognosis via apoptosis inhibition in colorectal cancers.

Y Takahashi1, G Sawada1, J Kurashige2, R Uchi2, T Matsumura1, H Ueo2, Y Takano2, H Eguchi2, T Sudo2, K Sugimachi2, H Yamamoto3, Y Doki3, M Mori3, K Mimori2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously conducted gene expression microarray analyses to identify novel indicators for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis and prognosis from which we identified PVT-1 as a candidate gene. PVT-1, which encodes a long noncoding RNA, mapped to chromosome 8q24 whose copy-number amplification is one of the most frequent events in a wide variety of malignant diseases. However, PVT-1 molecular mechanism of action remains unclear.
METHODS: We conducted cell proliferation and invasion assays using colorectal cancer cell lines transfected with PVT-1siRNA or negative control siRNA. Gene expression microarray analyses on these cell lines were also carried out to investigate the molecular function of PVT-1. Further, we investigated the impact of PVT-1 expression on the prognosis of 164 colorectal cancer patients by qRT-PCR.
RESULTS: CRC cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA exhibited significant loss of their proliferation and invasion capabilities. In these cells, the TGF-β signalling pathway and apoptotic signals were significantly activated. In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that PVT-1 expression level was an independent risk factor for overall survival of colorectal cancer patients.
CONCLUSION: PVT-1, which maps to 8q24, generates antiapoptotic activity in CRC, and abnormal expression of PVT-1 was a prognostic indicator for CRC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196785      PMCID: PMC3887297          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


To identify novel indicators for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis and prognosis, we previously conducted gene expression array analysis using clinical samples resulting in the identification of several genes, which are involved in cancer progression and metastasis (Takahashi ). The candidate genes include the PVT-1 oncogene (PVT-1), which encodes a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and maps to chromosome 8q24 (8q24) (Carninci ; Amaral ; Guttman ). Amplification of 8q24 is one of the most frequent events in a wide variety of malignant diseases including CRC, and has been associated with reduced survival duration in several studies (Popescu and Zimonjic, 2002; Lancaster ; Guan ). In addition to PVT-1, the well-established oncogene MYC has also been mapped to 8q24, and these two genes are co-amplified in CRC cell lines (Shtivelman and Bishop, 1989). lncRNAs were previously believed to represent random transcriptional noise. However, their expression levels have been observed to vary spatially, temporally and in response to various stimuli (Mercer ; Ponting ). Moreover, several lncRNAs exhibit very precise expression patterns in different tissues (Amaral and Mattick, 2008; Mercer ). In spite of emerging evidence, our understanding of the functions of these lncRNAs is limited. PVT-1 produces a wide variety of spliced noncoding RNAs as well as a cluster of six annotated microRNAs: miR-1204, miR-1205, miR-1206, miR-1207-5p, miR-1207-3p and miR-1208 (Barsotti ). However, PVT-1 exerts its influence as an lncRNA (Guan ; Alvarez and DiStefano, 2011; You ). The molecular mechanism of PVT-1 transcripts in gene regulation remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the clinical significance of PVT-1 expression in CRC.

Materials and methods

Patients and sample collection

We used a total of 312 CRC samples, of which 148 (set 1) were used as pure cancer tissues separated by laser microdissection (all cases were used for gene expression array and 130 cases were used for array-CGH), and 164 (set 2) were used in bulk for quantitative reverse transcription–PCR. All samples were obtained during surgery from patients who underwent resection of the primary tumour at Kyushu University Hospital at Beppu and affiliated hospitals between 1992 and 2007. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients had a clear histological diagnosis of CRC and were closely followed up every 3 months. The follow-up period in set 1 ranged from 0.1 months to 3.2 years with a mean of 2.1 years; follow-up in set 2 ranged from 0.1 to 12.3 years, with a mean of 3.8 years. Resected cancer tissues were immediately cut and stored in RNAlater (Ambion, Palo Alto, CA, USA) or embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT (optimum cutting temperature) medium (Sakura, Tokyo, Japan), frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C until DNA and RNA extraction. For DNA extraction, the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used following the manufacturer's protocol. For RNA extraction, frozen tissue specimens were homogenised in guanidinium thiocyanate, and total RNA was obtained by ultracentrifugation through a caesium chloride cushion. cDNA for reverse transcription–PCR was synthesised from 8.0 μg of total RNA with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Clinicopathological factors and clinical stage were classified using the TNM system of classification. All sample data, including age, gender, histology, tumour depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, liver metastasis and postoperative liver recurrence, were obtained from the clinical and pathological records.

Laser microdissection

Tissue samples were microdissected using an LMD6000 laser microdissection system (Leica Laser Microdissection System; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For LMD, 5 μm-thick frozen sections were fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 s, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and de-hydrated as follows: 5 s each in 70%, 95% and 100% ethanol. Sections were air dried and then microdissected with the LMD system. Target cells were excised, with at least 100 cells per section, and bound to the transfer film. Total RNA was then extracted.

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription–PCR

For quantitative real-time reverse transcription (qRT)–PCR, PVT-1 (NR_003367.1) primer sequences were 5′-TGAGAACTGTCCTTACGTGACC-3′ and 5′-AGAGCACCAAGACTGGCTCT-3′, and MYC (NM_002467.4) primer sequences were 5′-CACCAGCAGCGACTCTGA-3′ and 5′-GATCCAGACTCTGACCTTTTGC-3′. To normalise for RNA concentration, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as an internal control. The sequences of the GAPDH primers were sense, 5′-TTGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTCA-3′ and antisense, 5′-TGTCATCATATTTGGCAGGTT-3′. The amplification protocol included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. qRT–PCR was performed in a LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland) using the LightCycler 480 Probes Master kit (Roche Applied Science). All concentrations were calculated relative to the concentration of cDNA using Human Universal Reference Total RNA (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The concentration of PVT-1 was then divided by the concentration of the endogenous reference (GAPDH) to obtain normalised expression values. For qRT–PCR, for miR-1204, miR-1205, miR-1206, miR-1207-3p, miR-1207-5p and miR-1208, cDNA was synthesised from total RNA using TaqMan MicroRNA specific primers for each microRNAs (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and a TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Expression of target miRNAs was normalised to the expression of a small nuclear RNA, RNU6B (Applied Biosystems).

Cell lines

The human colorectal cancer cell lines RKO and HCT116 were obtained from the Japanese Cancer Research Bank (Tokyo, Japan) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin sulphate. All cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.

PVT-1 siRNA transfection

PVT-1-specific siRNAs (PVT-1siRNA-1: sense GCUUGGAGGCUGAGGAGUUTT and antisense AACUCCUCAGCCUCCAAGCTT and PVT-1 siRNA-2: sense CCCAACAGGAGGACAGCUUTT and antisense AAGCUGUCCUCCUGUUGGGTT) and negative control siRNA were purchased from Cosmo Bio (Tokyo, Japan). siRNA oligonucleotide (30 nmol l−1) in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) were transfected into RKO and HCT116 cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Cells in logarithmic growth phase were diluted without antibiotics and were seeded at 2 × 105 or 5 × 104 cells per well in a final volume of 2 ml or 500 μl, respectively, in 6- or 24-well flat-bottom microtiter plates, respectively. The cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere (37 °C and 5% CO2) for 24 h before use in assays.

Cell proliferation assay and cell invasion assay

To conduct the cell proliferation assay, 10 μl of MTT-labelling reagent (at a final concentration of 0.5 mg ml−1) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 4 h in a humidified atmosphere. Solubilisation solution (100 μl) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated overnight in a humidified atmosphere. After confirming that the purple formazan crystals were completely solubilised, the absorbance of each well was measured using a Model 550 series microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm corrected to 655 nm. The assay was performed using six replicates. Invasion assays were done using the BD Biocoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber (pore size: 8 μm, 24-well; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. A total of 5 × 104 cells were plated in the upper chamber in serum-free medium. The bottom chamber contained medium with 10% FBS. After 72 h, the bottom of the chamber insert was stained with Calcein AM (Invitrogen). The cells that had invaded through the membrane to the lower surface were evaluated in a fluorescence plate reader at excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/530 nm. Each assay was conducted in at least three replicates.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted from each cell line. Aliquots of total protein (40 μg) were electrophoresed in 10% concentrated poly-acrylamide gel and then electrophoresed and then electroblotted as previously described (Ieta ). The primary mouse monoclonal antibodies against caspase 3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), SMAD4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnbology, Dallas, TX, USA) were used at a dilution of 1 : 1000 and 1 : 200, respectively. Primary antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and the ImageQuant LAS 4000mini system (GE Healthcare Japan). Caspase 3 and SMAD4 proteins were normalised to the level of β-tubulin protein (Cell Signaling Technology) diluted 1 : 1000.

Array-CGH and copy-number analysis

A total of 130 tumour samples were prepared for array-CGH analysis. For genome profiling, the labelling and hybridisation of genomic DNA onto the Agilent Human Genome Microarray Kit 244 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The raw signal intensities were measured and transformed into log ratios to reference DNA with ‘Feature Extraction' software (version 9.1) from Agilent Technologies. Arrays were analysed using the Agilent DNA microarray scanner. The log ratio was thereafter used as the signal intensity of each probe. The raw copy-number data for each sample provided by array CGH was analysed using the GISTIC algorithm (Beroukhim ; Mermel ).

Gene expression array

The commercially available whole-Human Genome Microarray Kit and SurePrint G3 Human GE Microarray Kit (Agilent Technologies) were used to investigate globally altered genes. In brief, cyanine-labelled cRNA was prepared using the T7 linear amplification technique described in the Agilent Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit Manual (Agilent Technologies). Hundred nanograms of total RNA was extracted using the LMD technique and reverse transcribed to generate double-stranded cDNA using an oligo dT T7 promoter primer. Subsequently, cRNA was synthesised using T7 RNA polymerase, which simultaneously incorporated Cy3-labelled CTP. The quality of the cRNA was verified with the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. One microgram aliquots of Cy3-labelled cRNA were combined and fragmented in a hybridisation cocktail (Agilent Technologies). Labelled cRNA was then fragmented and hybridised to an oligonucleotide microarray. Fluorescence intensities were determined with an Agilent DNA microarray scanner. The gene expression profiles obtained from microarray data were quantile normalised. The batch effect in microarray experiments was also adjusted by an empirical Bayesian approach (Johnson ).

Gene set enrichment analysis

For GSEA, PVT-1 expression was treated as a numeric variable. We applied a continuous-type CLS file of the PVT-1 profile to phenotype labels in GSEA. The metric for ranking genes in GSEA was set as ‘pearson,' and the other parameters were set to their default values (Subramanian ).

Statistical analysis

For continuous variables, data were expressed as means±s.d. The relationship between PVT-1 expression and clinicopathological factors was analysed using a χ2-test and Student's t-test. Findings were considered significant when the P-value was <0.05. Correlation coefficients were analysed using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. All tests were performed using the JMP software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

8q24 copy-number amplification and PVT-1 expression

First, we applied array-CGH and gene expression array analyses on 130 CRC tumours to investigate the correlation between chromosome 8q24 copy-number and PVT-1 expression, and significant correlation was observed (Figure 1A; R2=0.181, P<0.0001). This result was validated with the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE, http://www.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home), which is a recently compiled public resource that contains gene expression and chromosomal copy-number data from nearly 1000 cancer cell lines(Barretina ). A significant positive correlation between 8q24 copy-number and PVT-1 expression was also observed in 50 CRC cell lines (Figure 1B; R2=0.420, P<0.0001). These findings showed that 8q24 copy-number gain promoted PVT-1 expression and suggested that aberrant expression of PVT-1, which we previously identified to be a candidate gene for CRC metastasis and progression (Takahashi ), was of significance accompanied by genomic alteration in CRC. As MYC is a well-established oncogene, which also maps to 8q24, we investigated the correlation between 8q24 copy-numbers and MYC expression. Copy-numbers of 8q24 and MYC expression were also positively correlated in CRC tissues and CRC cell lines. However, the correlation between MYC and 8q24 copy-numbers was weaker than that between PVT-1 and 8q24 copy-numbers (Figures 1C and D).
Figure 1

Positive correlation between chromosome 8q24 copy-number and (A) Chromosome 8q24 copy-number (horizontal axis) and PVT-1 expression (vertical axis) analysed by array-CGH and gene expression array in 130 colorectal cancer cases. Dot plots indicate each case. (B) Chromosome 8q24 copy-number (horizontal axis) and PVT-1 expression (vertical axis) in 50 colorectal cancer cell lines (the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia database). Dot plots indicate each cell line. (C) Chromosome 8q24 copy-number (horizontal axis) and MYC expression (vertical axis) analysed by array-CGH and gene expression array in 130 colorectal cancer cases. Dot plots indicate each case. (D) Chromosome 8q24 copy-number (horizontal axis) and MYC expression (vertical axis) in 50 colorectal cancer cell lines (the CCLE database). Dot plots indicate each cell line.

Knockdown of PVT-1 promotes apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines

Next, we conducted PVT-1 knockdown assays using siRNA to investigate the biological function of PVT-1 transcripts in CRC cells. Using qRT–PCR, we confirmed that PVT-1 expression in RKO and HCT116 cells transfected with PVT-1-specific siRNA was significantly lower than that in cells transfected with the negative control siRNA (Figure 2A). Cell proliferation assays were carried out in RKO and HCT116 colorectal cancer cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA or negative control siRNA. Both RKO and HCT116 cell lines have 8q24 copy-number amplification and PVT-1 upregulation according to the CCLE database. PVT-1 knockdown significantly inhibited cancer cell proliferation in both cell lines (Figure 2B). This finding suggested that aberrant expression of PVT-1 promoted the cell proliferation capability of colorectal cancer cells. Next, we conducted cancer cell invasion assays to verify the effect of PVT-1 on metastasis, since we had originally identified PVT-1 as a metastasis regulating gene. Then we observed that PVT-1 siRNA transfected cells had reduced invasive abilities compared with negative control cells (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

Knockdown of (A) qRT–PCR analysis showed that PVT-1 expression levels of both cell lines transfected with PVT-1 siRNA were significantly lower than negative control (nc) cells. (B) Cell proliferation ratio of RKO cells (left panel) and HCT116 cells (right panel) with or without PVT-1 knockdown. (C) Invasive properties of RKO cells (left panel) and HCT116 cells (right panel) with or without PVT-1 knockdown. (D) A total of 1187 genes with significant alteration of expression levels (649 upregulated and 538 downregulated) by knockdown of PVT-1(P<0.05). Representative genes are shown in the right side of the heat map. (E) Western blot (left, RKO; right, HCT116) analyses of cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA, and negative control cells show the activation of SMAD4 and cleavage of caspase3. Histograms represent the means±s.d. of three independent experiments. nc, cells transfected with negative control siRNA. si-1, cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA-1. si-2, cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA-2. *, statistically significant (P<0.05).

To uncover the underlying mechanisms of anticancer activity of PVT-1 knockdown, we performed gene expression microarray assays on cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA and negative control siRNA. A total of 649 genes including several apoptosis-relating genes were upregulated and 538 genes including some oncogenes were downregulated by PVT-1 knockdown (Figure 2D, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Functional annotation analyses were performed using David Bioinformatics Resources 6.7, which is a web-based bioinformatics application (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) (Imamichi ), and we found that genes in the pathways for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signalling and apoptosis were activated in cells with PVT-1 knockdown (Supplementary Table S3). Actually, western blot analyses showed that the protein expression of SMAD4, which is in the TGF-β signalling pathway, was induced, and the cleavage of caspase 3 was observed in PVT-1 knockdown cells (Figure 2E). These data showed that apoptosis was induced to CRC cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA via activation of TGF-β signalling. In order to confirm whether apoptosis was induced by knockdown of PVT-1 lncRNA or by knockdown of microRNAs encoded by PVT-1, which seemed to be downregulated following knockdown of PVT-1 transcripts, we conducted qRT–PCR assays for these six microRNAs in CRC cells transfected with PVT-1 siRNA and negative control siRNA. Five of six microRNAs were detected by qRT–PCR, and no microRNAs were downregulated by PVT-1 knockdown in CRC cells (Supplementary Figure S1).

PVT-1 expression is a prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer patients

PVT-1 expression levels in 164 tumour tissues and corresponding normal tissues were examined by qRT–PCR to investigate the clinical significance of PVT-1 in CRC. PVT-1 expression levels in cancerous tissues were significantly higher than those in non-cancerous tissues (P<0.0001; Figure 3A). We divided the 164 patients with CRC into a high PVT-1 expression group (n=131) and a low PVT-1 expression group (n=33), classified as having expression levels higher or lower than the 20 percentile value, respectively, which is an approximation of the highest value among normal tissues. Clinicopathological factors were then analysed in the high and low PVT-1 expression groups (Table 1). The high PVT-1 expression group showed greater lymph node metastasis and venous invasion compared with the low PVT-1 expression group. With regard to overall survival, patients with high PVT-1 expression had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with low PVT-1 expression (P=0.0101; Figure 3B). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that PVT-1 expression level was an independent prognostic indicator of overall survival in patients with CRC (relative risk: 2.532, P=0.016; Table 2). The clinical significance of MYC expression was also investigated in the same 164 colorectal cancer cases, as MYC is another important oncogene that maps to 8q24. MYC expression levels in cancerous tissues were significantly higher than those in non-cancerous tissues (P<0.0001; Figure 3C). In addition, we analysed the impact of MYC expression on colorectal cancer patients. We divided the 164 patients with colorectal cancer into a high MYC expression group (n=98) and a low PVT-1 expression group (n=66), classified as having expression levels higher or lower than the 40 percentile value, respectively, which is an approximation of the highest MYC expression value among normal tissues. However, the significance of MYC as a prognosticator for overall survival was not demonstrated in this case set (Figure 3D).
Figure 3

Abundant (A) qRT–PCR analyses of PVT-1expression levels on tumour tissues and paired normal tissues from 164 colorectal cancer samples. (B) Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves for 164 patients with CRC classified according to PVT-1 expression level. (C) qRT–PCR analyses of MYC expression levels on tumour tissues and paired normal tissues from 164 colorectal cancer samples. (D) Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves for 164 patients with CRC classified according to MYC expression level.

Table 1

PVT-1 expression and clinicopathological factors in 164 colorectal cancer cases

  Low expression
High expression
 
 
n=33
n=131
Factors Number%Number%P-value
Age (y)
<65
10
30.30%
48
36.64%
0.4922
 
>66
23
69.70%
83
63.36%
 
Sex
Male
19
57.58%
78
59.54%
0.8375
 
Female
14
42.42%
53
40.46%
 
Histological grade
Well/moderate
31
93.94%
121
92.37%
0.7514
 
other
2
6.06%
10
7.63%
 
Tumour size
<30 mm
7
21.21%
33
25.19%
0.6303
 
⩾30 mm
26
78.79%
98
74.81%
 
Serosal invasion
Absent
12
36.36%
36
27.48%
0.3236
 
Present
21
63.64%
95
72.52%
 
Lymph node metastasis
N0
24
72.73%
62
47.33%
0.0079a
 
N1-2
9
27.27%
69
52.67%
 
Lymphatic invasion
Absent
24
72.73%
73
55.73%
0.0702
 
Present
9
27.27%
58
44.27%
 
Venous invasion
Absent
30
90.91%
100
76.34%
0.0472a
 
Present
3
9.09%
31
23.66%
 
Liver metastasis
Absent
32
96.97%
114
87.02%
0.0649
 
Present
1
3.03%
17
12.98%
 
Peritoneal dissemination
Absent
33
100.00%
123
93.89%
0.0545
 
Present
0
0.00%
8
6.11%
 
Distant metastasis
Absent
32
96.97%
128
97.71%
0.8104
 
Present
1
3.03%
3
2.29%
 
UICC Stage
0, I, II
24
72.73%
57
43.51%
0.0023a
 III, IV927.27%7456.49% 

Abbreviations: Moderate=moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma; UICC=Union for International Cancer Control; Well=well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.

Statistically significant.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival (Cox proportional hazards regression model)

 
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
FactorsRR95% CIP-valueRR95% CIP-value
Age (< 65/66 <)
0.646
−0.800– −0.083
0.016a



Sex (male/female)
0.987
−0.380–0.341
0.944



Tumour size (< 30 mm/31 mm<)
2.078
0.187–1.173
0.012
1.616
0.931–2.540
0.083
Histology (well, moderate/others)
2.11
0.227–1.463
0.003a
1.365
0.799–2.820
0.28
Serosal invasion (absent/present)
4.218
0.669–2.879
<0.001a
2.788
1.237–11.920
0.009a
Lymphatic invasion (absent/present)
3.063
0.649–1.729
<0.001a
2.003
1.214–3.751
0.005a
Venous invasion (absent/present)
2.125
0.391–1.109
<0.001a
1.207
0.823–1.763
0.331
PVT-1 expression (low/high)2.9580.314–2.5240.002a2.5321.152–10.7470.016a

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; Moderate=moderately differentiated tubular; RR=relative risk; Well=well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.

Statistically significant.

Discussion

Several published reports have revealed that PVT-1 is involved in cancer pathophysiology. In the current study, we focused on the clinical significance of aberrant PVT-1 expression caused by copy-number amplification of chromosome 8q24. The MYC oncogene is also a notable oncogene mapping to 8q24 (Popescu and Zimonjic, 2002; Lancaster ; Guan ). However, the prognostic value of MYC expression was not verified in our case set. Although these data do not contradict the previously demonstrated significance of the MYC oncogene, the meaning of PVT-1 in CRC pathophysiology was strongly suggested. In our gene expression microarray analysis of CRC cell lines (Figure 2D), genes relating to the TGF-β signalling pathway were upregulated by PVT-1 knockdown. SMAD4, a well-known tumour suppressor gene, is a major mediator of intracellular TGF-β signalling (Heldin ; Massague, 1998) and inhibits tumour growth by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells (Brodin ; Dai ; Jang ; Li ). In the current study, SMAD4 and apoptosis-relating genes were upregulated by PVT-1 knockdown, suggesting that PVT-1 knockdown promoted apoptosis via TGF-β signalling activation in CRC cells. On the other hand, ROCK1, which is another mediator of TGF-β signalling and promotes cancer invasiveness, was also activated in PVT-1 knockdown cells. However, PVT-1 knockdown cells lose their invasive capability (Figure 2B). We consider that this is because apoptosis has more impact on the phenotypes of CRC cells than ROCK1 activation. Guan et al, have reported that PVT-1 inhibits apoptosis independently of MYC in breast and ovarian cancer (Guan ), and our results support their findings. However, the functions of microRNAs encoded by PVT-1 must be taken into account. miR-1207-5p was an only microRNA deregulated by PVT-1 knockdown, and the expression level of miR-1207-5p was upregulated following PVT-1 knockdown (Supplementary Figure S1). miR-1207-5p was predicted to repress CASP9, using the microRNA target prediction online tool, TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/), which is involved in apoptosis signal and is one of the representative genes deregulated by PVT-1 knockdown (shown in Figure 3D). Namely, miR-1207-5p was thought to inhibit apoptosis. Therefore, we consider that these microRNAs are regulated by other transcriptional mechanism and that these microRNAs are not involved in apoptosis induced by PVT-1 knockdown. Although only a small number of functional lncRNAs have been well characterised to date, emerging evidence has suggested that lncRNAs have roles as drivers of tumour suppressive or oncogenic functions in a wide variety of cancer types. In addition, many researchers have suggested mechanisms of action underlying the regulation of gene expression by lncRNAs (Wang and Chang, 2011). For example, lncRNAs can regulate chromosome structure in cis (Jonkers ) or in trans (Rinn ; Kogo ). Other lncRNAs modulate the activity of protein-binding partners (Espinoza ; Mariner ). However, the molecular function of PVT-1 is still controversial. However, we speculate that PVT-1 regulates chromatin modification by targeting the SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) complex, which has tumour suppressive function (Roberts and Orkin, 2004; Tolstorukov ). GSEA on clinical CRC samples suggested that PVT-1 modulated the expression levels of target genes of SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 2 (SMARCA2) that constitute an ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF complex (Supplementary Figures S2A and B) and that PVT-1 was associated with the apoptosis pathway (Supplementary Figures S2C). In addition, Shen et al. have reported the positive correlation between the expression of SMARCA2, SMAD4 and other genes on the TGF-β pathway (Shen ). Our in vitro study also supported these findings (Supplementary Figure S3). However, a limitation of this current study is that we did not demonstrate a direct molecular function of PVT-1 in apoptosis induction clearly, and further investigation is needed. In summary, we demonstrated that PVT-1, which encodes an lncRNA and maps to 8q24, generates antiapoptotic activity in colorectal cancer cells and that abnormal expression of PVT-1 was a prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer patients. Further study is required to understand the underlying mechanism of apoptosis inhibition by PVT-1.
  37 in total

1.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

Authors:  W Evan Johnson; Cheng Li; Ariel Rabinovic
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  John L Rinn; Michael Kertesz; Jordon K Wang; Sharon L Squazzo; Xiao Xu; Samantha A Brugmann; L Henry Goodnough; Jill A Helms; Peggy J Farnham; Eran Segal; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Marcel E Dinger; Susan M Sunkin; Mark F Mehler; John S Mattick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Increased smad expression and activation are associated with apoptosis in normal and malignant prostate after castration.

Authors:  G Brodin; P ten Dijke; K Funa; C H Heldin; M Landström
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Smad4 inhibits tumor growth by inducing apoptosis in estrogen receptor-alpha-positive breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Qingnan Li; Liyu Wu; Denise K Oelschlager; Mei Wan; Cecil R Stockard; William E Grizzle; Ning Wang; Huaiqing Chen; Yi Sun; Xu Cao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identification of overexpressed genes in hepatocellular carcinoma, with special reference to ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C gene expression.

Authors:  Keisuke Ieta; Eiki Ojima; Fumiaki Tanaka; Yoshito Nakamura; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Koshi Mimori; Hiroshi Inoue; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma.

Authors:  Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz; Leia Nghiemphu; Jordi Barretina; Teli Hsueh; David Linhart; Igor Vivanco; Jeffrey C Lee; Julie H Huang; Sethu Alexander; Jinyan Du; Tweeny Kau; Roman K Thomas; Kinjal Shah; Horacio Soto; Sven Perner; John Prensner; Ralph M Debiasi; Francesca Demichelis; Charlie Hatton; Mark A Rubin; Levi A Garraway; Stan F Nelson; Linda Liau; Paul S Mischel; Tim F Cloughesy; Matthew Meyerson; Todd A Golub; Eric S Lander; Ingo K Mellinghoff; William R Sellers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Amplification of PVT1 contributes to the pathophysiology of ovarian and breast cancer.

Authors:  Yinghui Guan; Wen-Lin Kuo; Jackie L Stilwell; Hirokuni Takano; Anna V Lapuk; Jane Fridlyand; Jian-Hua Mao; Mamie Yu; Melinda A Miller; Jennifer L Santos; Steve E Kalloger; Joseph W Carlson; David G Ginzinger; Susan E Celniker; Gordon B Mills; David G Huntsman; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome.

Authors:  P Carninci; T Kasukawa; S Katayama; J Gough; M C Frith; N Maeda; R Oyama; T Ravasi; B Lenhard; C Wells; R Kodzius; K Shimokawa; V B Bajic; S E Brenner; S Batalov; A R R Forrest; M Zavolan; M J Davis; L G Wilming; V Aidinis; J E Allen; A Ambesi-Impiombato; R Apweiler; R N Aturaliya; T L Bailey; M Bansal; L Baxter; K W Beisel; T Bersano; H Bono; A M Chalk; K P Chiu; V Choudhary; A Christoffels; D R Clutterbuck; M L Crowe; E Dalla; B P Dalrymple; B de Bono; G Della Gatta; D di Bernardo; T Down; P Engstrom; M Fagiolini; G Faulkner; C F Fletcher; T Fukushima; M Furuno; S Futaki; M Gariboldi; P Georgii-Hemming; T R Gingeras; T Gojobori; R E Green; S Gustincich; M Harbers; Y Hayashi; T K Hensch; N Hirokawa; D Hill; L Huminiecki; M Iacono; K Ikeo; A Iwama; T Ishikawa; M Jakt; A Kanapin; M Katoh; Y Kawasawa; J Kelso; H Kitamura; H Kitano; G Kollias; S P T Krishnan; A Kruger; S K Kummerfeld; I V Kurochkin; L F Lareau; D Lazarevic; L Lipovich; J Liu; S Liuni; S McWilliam; M Madan Babu; M Madera; L Marchionni; H Matsuda; S Matsuzawa; H Miki; F Mignone; S Miyake; K Morris; S Mottagui-Tabar; N Mulder; N Nakano; H Nakauchi; P Ng; R Nilsson; S Nishiguchi; S Nishikawa; F Nori; O Ohara; Y Okazaki; V Orlando; K C Pang; W J Pavan; G Pavesi; G Pesole; N Petrovsky; S Piazza; J Reed; J F Reid; B Z Ring; M Ringwald; B Rost; Y Ruan; S L Salzberg; A Sandelin; C Schneider; C Schönbach; K Sekiguchi; C A M Semple; S Seno; L Sessa; Y Sheng; Y Shibata; H Shimada; K Shimada; D Silva; B Sinclair; S Sperling; E Stupka; K Sugiura; R Sultana; Y Takenaka; K Taki; K Tammoja; S L Tan; S Tang; M S Taylor; J Tegner; S A Teichmann; H R Ueda; E van Nimwegen; R Verardo; C L Wei; K Yagi; H Yamanishi; E Zabarovsky; S Zhu; A Zimmer; W Hide; C Bult; S M Grimmond; R D Teasdale; E T Liu; V Brusic; J Quackenbush; C Wahlestedt; J S Mattick; D A Hume; C Kai; D Sasaki; Y Tomaru; S Fukuda; M Kanamori-Katayama; M Suzuki; J Aoki; T Arakawa; J Iida; K Imamura; M Itoh; T Kato; H Kawaji; N Kawagashira; T Kawashima; M Kojima; S Kondo; H Konno; K Nakano; N Ninomiya; T Nishio; M Okada; C Plessy; K Shibata; T Shiraki; S Suzuki; M Tagami; K Waki; A Watahiki; Y Okamura-Oho; H Suzuki; J Kawai; Y Hayashizaki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  149 in total

1.  Visible Light-Driven Self-Powered Device Based on a Straddling Nano-Heterojunction and Bio-Application for the Quantitation of Exosomal RNA.

Authors:  Xuehui Pang; Xin Zhang; Keke Gao; Shuo Wan; Cheng Cui; Lu Li; Haibin Si; Bo Tang; Weihong Tan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Silencing long noncoding RNA PVT1 inhibits tumorigenesis and cisplatin resistance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Guanfang Ping; Wancheng Xiong; Lanfang Zhang; Yanru Li; Yusong Zhang; Yongli Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Increased expression of the lncRNA PVT1 promotes tumorigenesis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Rong Yang; Shu-Zhi Zang; Chun-Lei Zhong; Yun-Xia Li; Sha-Sha Zhao; Xian-Jun Feng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Gene expression profile comparison between colorectal cancer and adjacent normal tissues.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Maohui Feng; Xiang Ma; Huachi Li; Wei Xie
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  AnnoLnc: A One-Stop Portal to Systematically Annotate Novel Human Long Noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  De-Chang Yang; Lan Ke; Yang Ding; Ge Gao
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  LncRNA, a novel target biomolecule, is involved in the progression of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Weihong Sun; Shaoshao Ren; Ran Li; Qingshan Zhang; Haiping Song
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Long non-coding RNA PVT1 as a novel biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Di Cui; Cai-Hua Yu; Min Liu; Qing-Qing Xia; Yu-Feng Zhang; Wei-Long Jiang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-21

8.  Biological function and mechanism of MALAT-1 in renal cell carcinoma proliferation and apoptosis: role of the MALAT-1-Livin protein interaction.

Authors:  Shaoan Chen; Pengpeng Ma; Ying Zhao; Bin Li; Shaobo Jiang; Hui Xiong; Zheng Wang; Hanbo Wang; Xunbo Jin; Chuan Liu
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 9.  Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Yoshinaga Okugawa; William M Grady; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  LncRNA PVT1 regulates triple-negative breast cancer through KLF5/beta-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Jianming Tang; Yanxin Li; Youzhou Sang; Bo Yu; Deguan Lv; Weiwei Zhang; Haizhong Feng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.