Literature DB >> 24196544

Usefulness of the introducer method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy using ultrathin transnasal endoscopy.

Hong Seok Lee1, Chul-Hyun Lim, Eun Young Park, Wook-Hyun Lee, Jin Hee No, Byoung Yeon Jun, Sung Jin Moon, Jin Su Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Kyu Yong Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introducer method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) minimizes procedure-related peristomal infection. Ultrathin transnasal endoscopy (UTE) allows comfortable endoscopic examination of patients with fewer adverse effects and passage of the endoscope through a narrow esophagus or oropharynx. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes for the introducer method of PEG with UTE.
METHODS: Patients who underwent the introducer method of PEG with UTE between March 2009 and May 2012 were analyzed. The outcomes and complications of the patients within 180 days after gastrostomy placement were investigated. RESULT: During the study period, 92 patients (31.9 % male; age, 67.7 ± 16.6 years) underwent the introducer method of PEG with UTE. The major indications for PEG insertion were stroke (40.4 %), esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer (27.1 %), and neurologic disorder (14.9 %). Esophageal stenosis was identified by endoscopy or imaging in 14 patients before PEG. In all the patients, UTE was successfully introduced through the nasal cavity. In 90 (97.8 %) of the 92 patients, PEG was successfully inserted. Insertion of the endoscope into the stomach was impossible in two patients because head and neck cancer caused severe narrowing of the upper esophagus. No procedure-related peristomal infection, gastric contents leakage, or bleeding occurred within 30 days after gastrostomy placement. In eight patients (8.7 %), catheter displacement occurred within 30 days. Catheter displacement in 44 patients (47.8 %) and gastric contents leakage in eight patients (9 %) occurred within 30-180 days after gastrostomy placement.
CONCLUSION: Introducer PEG with UTE is a useful method for gastrostomy placement with a high success rate. This technique allows procedure-related complications to be avoided and permits the use of endoscopy in patients with narrow esophagi or oropharynges. However, the long-term durability of the balloon-type catheter is questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196544     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3215-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Unsedated transnasal PEG placement.

Authors:  Jérôme Dumortier; Marie-George Lapalus; Adelino Pereira; Jean-Pierre Lagarrigue; Annick Chavaillon; Thierry Ponchon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods.

Authors:  M A Quine; G D Bell; R F McCloy; J E Charlton; H B Devlin; A Hopkins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  G D Schapiro; S A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-04

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy by the "pull" and "introducer" methods.

Authors:  M Deitel; M Bendago; E H Spratt; C J Burul; T B To
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in selected patients.

Authors:  M A Vitale; G Villotti; L D'Alba; M A De Cesare; S Frontespezi; G Iacopini
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Successful control of peristomal infection by introducer-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective historical control study.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Lim; Jae Myung Park; Yu Kyung Cho; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi; In-Sik Chung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Technical modifications for improving the success rate of PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Taller; E Horvath; L Iliás; Z Kótai; M Simig; J Elö; L Harsányi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  Mika Yuki; Yuji Amano; Yoshinori Komazawa; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Toshihiro Shizuku; Shun Yamamoto; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: predictors of 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.

Authors:  David M Richards; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Gaurav Arora; Sushovan Guha; Alexander A Dekovich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  1 in total

1.  Portable disposable ultrathin endoscopy tested through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Myong Ki Baeg; Chul-Hyun Lim; Jin Su Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; Bo-In Lee; In-Seok Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.