Literature DB >> 24196385

Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria for the classification of spondyloarthritis in early spondyloarthritis clinics participating in the ESPERANZA programme.

Eva Tomero1, Juan Mulero, Eugenio de Miguel, Cruz Fernández-Espartero, Milena Gobbo, Miguel A Descalzo, Eduardo Collantes-Estévez, Pedro Zarco, Santiago Muñoz-Fernández, Loreto Carmona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the performance of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for the classification of SpA in early SpA clinics.
METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study of patients referred to early SpA units within the ESPERANZA programme (a Spanish nationwide health management programme designed to provide excellence in diagnosis and care for early SpA). Patients were eligible if they were <45 years of age and had any of the following: (i) a 2-year history of inflammatory back pain; (ii) back or joint pain with psoriasis, anterior uveitis, radiographic sacroiliitis, family history of SpA or positive HLA-B27; or (iii) asymmetric arthritis. We excluded patients for whom imaging (X-rays/MRI) or HLA-B27 results were not available. We analysed the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of different classification criteria sets, taking the rheumatologist's opinion as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The analysis included 775 patients [mean age 33 (s.d. 7) years; 55% men; mean duration of symptoms 11 (s.d. 6) months]; SpA was diagnosed in 538 patients (69.5%). A total of 274 (67.9%) patients with chronic back pain met the ASAS axial criteria, 76 (56.3%) patients with arthritis but not chronic back pain fulfilled the ASAS criteria for peripheral SpA and 350 (65.1%) fulfilled all the ASAS criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the ASAS criteria set were 65% and 93%, respectively (axial criteria: sensitivity 68%, specificity 95%). The sensitivity and specificity for the ESSG and Amor criteria were 58% and 90% and 59% and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Despite performing better than the Amor or ESSG criteria, the ASAS criteria may be limited to detection of early forms, particularly in populations in which MRI is not extensively available or in populations with a low prevalence of HLA-B27.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification criteria; clinical practice; early spondyloarthritis; validation studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196385     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  10 in total

1.  Polymorphisms of human leukocyte antigen B*27 on clinical phenotype of spondyloarthritis in Chinese.

Authors:  Hai-Jun Ma; Qing-Feng Yin; Yun Liu; Yin Wu; Tie-Chui Zhu; Ming-Hao Guo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis: recent insights and impact of new classification criteria.

Authors:  Fabian Proft; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  [Classification criteria for rheumatic diseases].

Authors:  H Zeidler
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Analysis and performance of various classification criteria sets in a Colombian cohort of patients with spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Wilson Bautista-Molano; Robert B M Landewé; John Londoño; Consuelo Romero-Sanchez; Rafael Valle-Oñate; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The performance of classification criteria for juvenile spondyloarthropathies.

Authors:  Amra Adrovic; Metin Sezen; Kenan Barut; Sezgin Sahin; Cengizhan Acikel; Erkan Demirkaya; Ozgur Kasapcopur
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Evaluation of the impact of fibromyalgia in disease activity and treatment effect in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Natalia Bello; Adrien Etcheto; Caroline Béal; Maxime Dougados; Anna Moltó
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  The prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis in the UK: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Hamilton; Alex Macgregor; Andoni Toms; Victoria Warmington; Edward Pinch; Karl Gaffney
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Peripheral disease contributes significantly to the level of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Janneke J de Winter; Jacqueline E Paramarta; Henriëtte M de Jong; Marleen G van de Sande; Dominique L Baeten
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-01-11

9.  Australian Consensus Statements for the Assessment and Management of Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Steven L Truong; Tim McEwan; Paul Bird; Irwin Lim; Nivene F Saad; Lionel Schachna; Andrew L Taylor; Philip C Robinson
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-12-28

10.  Prevalence and consequences of psoriasis in recent axial spondyloarthritis: an analysis of the DESIR cohort over 6 years.

Authors:  Florian Lucasson; Pascal Richette; Krystel Aouad; Adeline Ryussen-Witrand; Daniel Wendling; Bruno Fautrel; Laure Gossec
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.