Literature DB >> 24195679

The (stalled) progress of interprofessional collaboration: the role of gender.

Ann V Bell1, Barret Michalec, Christine Arenson.   

Abstract

Researchers have demonstrated that team-based, collaborative care improves patient outcomes and fosters safer, more effective health care. Despite such positive findings, interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has been somewhat stunted in its adoption. Utilizing a socio-historical lens and employing expectation states theory, we explore potential reasons behind IPC's slow integration. More specifically, we argue that a primary mechanism hindering the achievement of the full promise of IPC stems not only from the rigid occupational status hierarchy nested within health care delivery, but also from the broader status differences between men and women--and how these societal-level disparities are exercised and perpetuated within health care delivery. For instance, we examine not only the historical differences in occupational status of the more "gendered" professions within health care delivery teams (e.g. medicine and nursing), but also the persistent under-representation of women in the physician workforce, especially in leadership positions. Doing so reveals how gender representation, or lack thereof, could potentially lead to ineffective, mismanaged and segmented interprofessional care. Implications and potential solutions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24195679     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.851073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  7 in total

1.  From ideal to real: a qualitative study of the implementation of in situ interprofessional simulation-based education.

Authors:  Mindy Ju; Naike Bochatay; Kathryn Robertson; James Frank; Bridget O'Brien; Sandrijn van Schaik
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  Health professionals' experiences of tuberculosis cohort audit in the North West of England: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Selina K Wallis; Kate Jehan; Mark Woodhead; Paul Cleary; Katie Dee; Stacey Farrow; Paddy McMaster; Carolyn Wake; Jenny Walker; D J Sloan; S B Squire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Labouring Together: collaborative alliances in maternity care in Victoria, Australia-protocol of a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Vanessa Watkins; Cate Nagle; Bridie Kent; Alison M Hutchinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Profiling mental health professionals in relation to perceived interprofessional collaboration on teams.

Authors:  Nicolas Ndibu Muntu Keba Kebe; François Chiocchio; Jean-Marie Bamvita; Marie-Josée Fleury
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-03-29

5.  Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams.

Authors:  Nicolas Ndibu Muntu Keba Kebe; François Chiocchio; Jean-Marie Bamvita; Marie-Josée Fleury
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  A multilevel study of patient-centered care perceptions in mental health teams.

Authors:  François Durand; Marie-Josée Fleury
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The effect of group-dynamics, collaboration and tutor style on the perception of profession-based stereotypes: a quasi-experimental pre- post-design on interdisciplinary tutorial groups.

Authors:  Eva Hammar Chiriac; Endre Sjøvold; Alexandra Björnstjerna Hjelm
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.