Literature DB >> 24195599

Bibliometric analysis of Nobelists' awards and landmark papers in physiology or medicine during 1983-2012.

Siqi Ye1, Rui Xing, Jing Liu, Feiyue Xing.   

Abstract

AIM: This study's purpose was to determine if there was a relationship between Nobel Laureates' awards and landmark papers and winning the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine during 1983-2012.
METHODS: The 66 Nobelists' awards and landmark papers in the period 1983-2012 were analyzed.
RESULTS: The results showed that the most Nobelists had won Gairdner, Lasker, Howitz or Wolf Award before they won Nobel Prize, indicating that Gairdner Award may be considered as a Nobel Prize's wind vane. A small number of landmark papers were indeed published in low impact factor journals (10.5% below impact factor 5.0) and some of their citation were low (23.2% below 400 times). There were 61 of 76 landmark papers published in the journals of JCR partition 1, reaching 80%, but 2 of 76 landmark papers were even outside of JCR partition, demonstrating that JCR partition acts as a reciprocal supplement with impact factor and citation times. The test period of Nobel Prize was substantially between 10 to 30 years. There were 5 persons whose landmark papers were cited all above 6000 times to get Nobel Prize within the test period of ten years, suggesting that there is a trend of certain inverse ratio between the citation and the test period of Nobel Prize.
CONCLUSION: These findings provide a new insight into the relationship among Nobel Laureates' awards, landmark papers and Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24195599     DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2013.850838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  9 in total

1.  The Top 100 Articles in the Medical Informatics: a Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Hamed Nadri; Bahlol Rahimi; Toomas Timpka; Shahram Sedghi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential papers on COPD.

Authors:  Wenchao Gu; Yaping Yuan; Hua Yang; Guangsheng Qi; Xiaoyan Jin; Jin Yan
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-03-25

3.  Authentication: A Standard Problem or a Problem of Standards?

Authors:  Amanda Capes-Davis; Richard M Neve
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maria Schlagberger; Lutz Bornmann; Johann Bauer
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Work honored by Nobel prizes clusters heavily in a few scientific fields.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Ioana-Alina Cristea; Kevin W Boyack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Citation Classics in Cone Beam Computed Tomography: The 100 Top-Cited Articles.

Authors:  Shailesh M Gondivkar; Sachin C Sarode; Amol R Gadbail; Rima S Gondivkar; Nilookumari Choudhary; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-12-30

7.  Research Trends on the Rotator Cuff Tendon: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Past 2 Decades.

Authors:  Lei Lei; Chi Zhang; Fu-Hua Sun; Yujie Xie; Bin Liang; Li Wang; Guoyin Pang; Ruyan Chen; Wei Jiang; Xia Ou; Akira Miyamoto; Jianxiong Wang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21

8.  The top 50 most cited articles in carpal tunnel syndrome research: A bibliometrics study.

Authors:  Lei Lei; Shanshan Yin; Fanyuan Meng; Ya Zhou; Xuan Xu; Li Juan Ao; Rui Xu; Mo Xian Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Who is who in cardiovascular research? What a review of Nobel Prize nominations reveals about scientific trends.

Authors:  Marie Drobietz; Adrian Loerbroks; Nils Hansson
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 5.460

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.