| Literature DB >> 24194692 |
Mahendra Raj Karekal1, Vivekanand Biradar, Mruthyunjayaswamy Bennikallu Hire Mathada.
Abstract
A new Schiff base of 5-chloro-3-phenyl-1H-indole-2-carboxyhydrazide and 3-formyl-2-hydroxy-1H-quinoline (HL), and its Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Hg(II) complexes have been synthesized and characterized in the light of microanalytical, IR, H1 NMR, UV-Vis, FAB-mass, ESR, XRD, and TGA spectral studies. The magnetic susceptibility measurements and low conductivity data provide evidence for monomeric and neutral nature of the complexes. On the basis of spectral studies and analytical data, it is evident that the Schiff base acts as tridentate ligand. The Cu(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) complexes were octahedral, whereas Zn(II), Cd(II), and Hg(II) complexes were tetrahedral in nature. The redox behavior of the Cu(II) complex was investigated by electrochemical method using cyclic voltammetry. In order to evaluate the effect of metal ions upon chelation, both the ligand and its metal complexes were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method. The DNA cleavage experiment performed using agarose gel electrophoresis method showed the cleavage of DNA by all the metal complexes. The free radical scavenging activity of newly synthesized compounds has been determined at a different concentration range by means of their interaction with the stable free radical 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH).Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24194692 PMCID: PMC3806341 DOI: 10.1155/2013/315972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1Synthesis of Schiff base ligand HL.
Physical, analytical, magnetic susceptibility, and molar conductance data of ligand HL and its complexes.
| Compounds | Molecular formula | Mol. Wt. | M.P (°C) (Yield in %) | Elemental analysis (%) Calcd (Found) | Mag. moment | Molar cond ( | Colour | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | C | H | N | Cl | |||||||
|
| C25H17O2N4Cl | 440 | 314 (65) | — | 68.10 (68.25) | 3.85 (3.91) | 12.71 (12.89) | 8.05 (8.12) | — | — | Yellow |
| Cu complex | [Cu(C50H32O4N8Cl2)]H2O | 959.54 | >340 (70) | 6.61 (6.71) | 62.46 (62.59) | 3.53 (3.32) | 11.66 (11.74) | 7.39 (7.21) | 1.79 | 31 | Green |
| Co complex | [Co(C50H32O4N8Cl2)]H2O | 954.93 | >340 (77) | 6.16 (6.26) | 62.76 (62.92) | 3.55 (3.82) | 11.71 (11.86) | 7.42 (7.62) | 5.01 | 24 | Brown |
| Ni complex | [Ni(C50H32O4N8Cl2)]H2O | 954.69 | >340 (79) | 6.14 (6.19) | 62.78 (62.92) | 3.55 (3.69) | 11.71 (11.91) | 7.42 (7.59) | 2.90 | 27 | Brown |
| Zn complex | [Zn(C25H16O2N4Cl) (Cl)]H2O | 557.40 | >340 (69) | 11.71 (11.62) | 53.72 (53.99) | 3.22 (3.35) | 10.02 (10.19) | 12.71 (12.89) | — | 49 | Light yellow |
| Cd complex | [Cd(C25H16O2N4Cl) (Cl)]H2O | 604.41 | >340 (71) | 18.56 (18.65) | 49.55 (49.71) | 2.97 (2.81) | 9.24 (9.35) | 11.72 (11.90) | — | 60 | Pale yellow |
| Hg complex | [Hg(C25H16O2N4Cl) (Cl)] | 674.59 | 330 (68) | 29.69 (29.75) | 44.40 (44.61) | 2.36 (2.42) | 8.28 (8.36) | 10.50 (10.66) | — | 50 | Light Yellow |
HL = ligand.
The IR data of ligand HL and its complexes (cm−1).
| Compounds |
|
|
|
| Pyridine ring |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3311, 3229, 3162 | 1674, 1661 | — | 1608 | — | — | — | — |
| Cu complex | 3283, 3221 | 1639, — | 3418 | 1548 | 1493, 1077, 615 | 514 | 442 | — |
| Co complex | 3271, 3230 | 1629, — | 3423 | 1551 | 1489, 1061, 670 | 553 | 435 | — |
| Ni complex | 3305, 3218 | 1638, — | 3430 | 1555 | 1478, 1063, 621 | 477 | 450 | — |
| Zn complex | 3305, 3218 | 1634, — | 3420 | 1557 | 1489, 1066, 615 | 470 | 425 | 357 |
| Cd complex | 3293, 3221 | 1637, — | 3423 | 1550 | 1425, 1059, 699 | 469 | 419 | 350 |
| Hg complex | 3295, 3230 | 1664, — | — | 1560 | 1420, 1060, 640 | 550 | 428 | 352 |
HL = ligand.
The 1H NMR data of ligand HL and its Zn(II) and Cd(II) complexes.
| Ligand/complexes |
1H NMR data ( |
|---|---|
|
| 12.20 and 12.00 (s, 2H, two CONH), 11.60 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.40 (s, 1H, HC=N), 7.10–8.20 (m, 13H, ArH). |
| Zn complex | 13.12 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.53 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.45 (s, 1H, HC=N), 7.35–8.55 (m, 12H, ArH). |
| Cd complex | 13.14 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.62 (s, 1H, indole NH), 8.46 (s, 1H, HC=N), 7.20–8.35 (m, 12H, ArH). |
HL = ligand.
Figure 1FAB-mass spectrum of Ni(II) complex.
Scheme 2Mass fragmentation of Ni(II) complex.
Figure 2FAB-mass spectrum of Zn(II) complex.
Scheme 3Mass fragmentation of Zn(II) complex.
Electronic spectral bands and ligand field parameters of the Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) complexes in DMF (10−3 M) solution.
| Complexes | Transitions in cm−1 | Dq (cm−1) |
|
|
|
| LFSE (k cal) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Cu(II) complex | 13769–17463 | 1530 | — | — | — | — | 26.22 | ||
| Co(II) complex | 7447 | 15977 | 19518 | 853 | 877 | 0.843 | 9.680 | 1.480 | 14.622 |
| Ni(II) complex | 9680 | 15604 | 25634 | 968 | 812 | 0.780 | 21.92 | 1.470 | 33.188 |
*Calculated values.
Thermal decomposition of the complexes.
| Complex number | Decomposition temp (°C) | % Weight loss | Metal oxide % | Inference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obsd | Cald | Obsd | Cald | |||
| Cu complex | 100 | 1.51 | 1.87 | — | — | Loss of lattice water molecule |
| 335 | 61.55 | 59.47 | — | — | Loss due to two indole (2C15H10N3OCl) species | |
| 519 | 27.88 | 27.87 | — | — | Loss due to 2C4H4 | |
| Upto 750 | — | — | 8.28 | 8.10 | Loss due to remaining organic moiety | |
|
| ||||||
| Co complex | 100 | 1.88 | 1.59 | — | — | Loss of lattice water molecule |
| 348 | 61.55 | 59.47 | — | — | Loss due to two indole (2C15H10N3OCl) species | |
| Upto 750 | — | — | 8.19 | 8.05 | Loss due to remaining organic moiety | |
|
| ||||||
| Zn complex | 110 | 3.09 | 3.22 | — | — | Loss of lattice water molecule |
| 340 | 48.15 | 48.25 | — | — | Loss due to C15H10N2OCl | |
| Upto 750 | — | — | 14.96 | 14.29 | Loss due to organic moiety | |
|
| ||||||
| Hg complex | 330 | 5.31 | 5.33 | — | — | Loss due to HCl |
| 354 | 49.46 | 48.46 | — | — | Loss due to C19H13ONCl species | |
| Upto 850 | — | — | 32.25 | 32.09 | Loss due to remaining organic moiety | |
Figure 3TG-DTA curve of Cu(II) complex.
Powder X-ray diffraction data of Ni(II) complex.
| Peak | 2 |
| Sin | Sin2 |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cald. | Obsd. | ||||||||
| 1 | 6.086 | 3.043 | 0.0530 | 0.00281 | 1.000 (1) | 1 0 0 | 14.5333 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 2 | 7.385 | 3.692 | 0.0643 | 0.00414 | 1.473 (1) | 1 1 0 | 11.9797 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 3 | 11.123 | 5.561 | 0.0969 | 0.00939 | 3.341 (3) | 1 1 1 | 7.9494 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 4 | 12.964 | 6.482 | 0.1128 | 0.01274 | 4.533 (5) | 2 1 0 | 6.8289 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 5 | 14.863 | 7.431 | 0.1293 | 0.01672 | 5.950 (6) | 2 1 1 | 5.9574 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 6 | 19.509 | 9.754 | 0.1694 | 0.02870 | 10.213 (10) | 3 1 0 | 4.5472 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 7 | 23.902 | 11.951 | 0.2070 | 0.04288 | 15.259 (15) | — | 3.7212 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 8 | 25.570 | 12.785 | 0.2212 | 0.04897 | 17.427 (17) | 3 2 2 | 3.4823 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 9 | 38.460 | 19.230 | 0.3293 | 0.10847 | 38.601 (39) | — | 2.3392 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 10 | 42.710 | 21.355 | 0.3641 | 0.13260 | 47.188 (47) | — | 2.1156 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 11 | 57.670 | 28.835 | 0.4822 | 0.23260 | 82.775 (83) | — | 1.5974 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 12 | 60.383 | 30.191 | 0.5028 | 0.25289 | 90.000 (90) | 7 5 4 | 1.5320 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 13 | 67.305 | 33.652 | 0.5541 | 0.30707 | 109.27 (109) | — | 1.3901 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
| 14 | 77.026 | 38.513 | 0.6226 | 0.38774 | 137.98 (138) | 8 7 5 | 1.2372 | 14.53 | 14.53 |
Powder X-ray diffraction data of Zn(II) complex.
| Peak | 2 |
| Sin | Sin2 |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cald. | Obsd. | ||||||||
| 1 | 6.953 | 3.4765 | 0.0606 | 0.00367 | 1.000 (1) | 1 0 0 | 12.7112 | 12.7028 | 12.71 |
| 2 | 7.786 | 3.8930 | 0.0678 | 0.00460 | 1.253 (1) | 1 0 0 | 11.3613 | 11.3461 | 12.71 |
| 3 | 10.094 | 5.0470 | 0.0879 | 0.00739 | 2.013 (2) | 1 1 0 | 8.7633 | 8.7561 | 12.71 |
| 4 | 12.115 | 6.0575 | 0.1055 | 0.01113 | 3.032 (3) | 1 1 1 | 7.3014 | 7.2995 | 12.71 |
| 5 | 14.757 | 7.3785 | 0.1284 | 0.01649 | 4.493 (4) | 2 0 0 | 5.9992 | 5.998 | 12.71 |
| 6 | 16.104 | 8.0522 | 0.1400 | 0.01962 | 5.346 (5) | 2 1 0 | 5.5021 | 5.499 | 12.71 |
| 7 | 18.325 | 9.1625 | 0.1592 | 0.02535 | 6.907 (7) | — | 4.8385 | 4.8374 | 12.71 |
| 8 | 20.999 | 10.199 | 0.1770 | 0.03135 | 8.542 (9) | 2 2 1, 3 0 0 | 4.3519 | 4.3501 | 12.71 |
| 9 | 23.474 | 11.737 | 0.2034 | 0.04137 | 11.272 (11) | 3 1 1 | 3.7871 | 3.7867 | 12.71 |
| 10 | 25.247 | 12.623 | 0.2185 | 0.04776 | 13.013 (13) | 3 2 0 | 3.5254 | 3.5247 | 12.71 |
| 11 | 32.675 | 16.3375 | 0.2812 | 0.07912 | 21.558 (22) | 3 3 2 | 2.7393 | 2.7384 | 12.71 |
| 12 | 38.105 | 19.052 | 0.3264 | 0.1065 | 29.032 (29) | 5 2 0 | 2.3599 | 2.3597 | 12.71 |
| 13 | 45.866 | 22.933 | 0.3896 | 0.1518 | 41.370 (41) | 6 2 1 | 1.9771 | 1.9768 | 12.71 |
| 14 | 48.416 | 24.208 | 0.4100 | 0.1681 | 45.814 (46) | 6 3 1 | 1.8780 | 1.8785 | 12.71 |
| 15 | 61.823 | 30.911 | 0.5137 | 0.2639 | 71.907 (72) | 6 6 0 | 1.4995 | 1.4994 | 12.71 |
Figure 4Cyclic voltammogram of Cu(II) complex at a scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC µg mL−1) of ligand and its metal complexes.
| Compounds | MIC value in | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 50 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
| Cu complex | 12.50 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 12.50 | 12.50 |
| Co complex | 25 | 50 | 12.50 | 50 | 12.50 | 25 | 25 |
| Ni complex | 12.50 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 12.50 | 25 |
| Zn complex | 25 | 50 | 25 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
| Cd complex | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 25 | 12.50 | 25 | 12.50 |
| Hg complex | 25 | 12.50 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 12.50 |
| Gentamycin | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | — | — | — |
| Fluconazole | — | — | — | — | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 |
HL = ligand.
Figure 5DNA cleavage of E. coli genome. M: standard molecular weight marker; C: control. Lane HL, Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, and Cd treated DNA of E. coli genome with respective compounds.
Figure 6Antioxidant results of ligand and its complexes.
Figure 7Proposed structures of metal complexes.