Literature DB >> 24194477

Nomogram for predicting the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.

Robert Eil1, Brian S Diggs, Samuel J Wang, James P Dolan, John G Hunter, Charles R Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The survival impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on esophageal cancer remains difficult to establish for specific patients. The aim of the current study was to create a Web-based prediction tool providing individualized survival projections based on tumor and treatment data.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 1997 and 2005 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. The covariates analyzed were sex, T and N classification, histology, total number of lymph nodes examined, and treatment with esophagectomy or CRT followed by esophagectomy. After propensity score weighting, a log-logistic regression model for overall survival was selected based on the Akaike information criterion.
RESULTS: A total of 824 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with esophagectomy or trimodal therapy met the selection criteria. On multivariate analysis, age, sex, T and N classification, number of lymph nodes examined, treatment, and histology were found to be significantly associated with overall survival and were included in the regression analysis. Preoperative staging data and final surgical margin status were not available within the SEER-Medicare data set and therefore were not included. The model predicted that patients with T4 or lymph node disease benefitted from CRT. The internally validated concordance index was 0.72.
CONCLUSIONS: The SEER-Medicare database of patients with esophageal cancer can be used to produce a survival prediction tool that: 1) serves as a counseling and decision aid to patients and 2) assists in risk modeling. Patients with T4 or lymph node disease appeared to benefit from CRT. This nomogram may underestimate the benefit of CRT due to its variable downstaging effect on pathologic stage. It is available at skynet.ohsu.edu/nomograms.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemoradiotherapy; esophageal cancer; neoadjuvant; nomogram; predictive tool

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24194477     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

1.  Novel Calculator to Estimate Overall Survival Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Rupen Shah; Steven Nurkin; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Patients with Non-response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer Have No Survival Advantage over Patients Undergoing Primary Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume S Chevrollier; Danica N Giugliano; Francesco Palazzo; Scott W Keith; Ernest L Rosato; Nathaniel R Evans Iii; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Non responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: why better prediction is necessary.

Authors:  Chantal M den Bakker; Justin K Smit; Anna M E Bruynzeel; Nicole C T van Grieken; Freek Daams; Sarah Derks; Miguel A Cuesta; John T M Plukker; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Prognostic models for stage I-III esophageal cancer: a comparison between existing calculators.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Tamara Díaz Vico; Denslow A Trumbull; Kristopher Attwood; Aaron C Spaulding; Enrique F Elli; Dorin T Colibaseanu; Moshim Kukar; Emmanuel Gabriel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

5.  Conditional Survival of Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis from the SEER Registry (1988-2011).

Authors:  Ellen Kim; Siran Koroukian; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Development and validation of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in elderly patients with gastric cancer after surgery.

Authors:  Yujie Zhang; Chaoran Yu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

7.  A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiu-Zhong Pan; Qi-Jing Wang; Jia-Qiang Dan; Ke Pan; Yong-Qiang Li; Yao-Jun Zhang; Jing-Jing Zhao; De-Sheng Weng; Yan Tang; Li-Xi Huang; Jia He; Shi-Ping Chen; Miao-La Ke; Min-Shan Chen; Max S Wicha; Alfred E Chang; Yi-Xin Zeng; Qiao Li; Jian-Chuan Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Osteopontin (OPN/SPP1) isoforms collectively enhance tumor cell invasion and dissemination in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jules Lin; Amy L Myers; Zhuwen Wang; Derek J Nancarrow; Daysha Ferrer-Torres; Amy Handlogten; Kimmy Leverenz; Julia Bao; Dafydd G Thomas; Thomas D Wang; Mark B Orringer; Rishindra M Reddy; Andrew C Chang; David G Beer; Lin Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-08

9.  Prognostic value of SUR in patients with trimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Rebecca Bütof; Frank Hofheinz; Klaus Zöphel; Julia Schmollack; Christina Jentsch; Sebastian Zschaeck; Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff; Michael Baumann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Survival of Esophageal Cancer Patients after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jinlin Cao; Ping Yuan; Luming Wang; Yiqing Wang; Honghai Ma; Xiaoshuai Yuan; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.