Literature DB >> 24194179

The prognostic value of apoptotic and proliferative markers in breast cancer.

Charla C Engels1, Francesca Ruberta, Esther M de Kruijf, Gabi W van Pelt, Vincent T H B M Smit, Gerrit Jan Liefers, Tomoko Matsushima, Masaki Shibayama, Hideki Ishihara, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Peter J K Kuppen.   

Abstract

Increasing ability of early breast cancer (BC) diagnosis leading to more early stage detection, better survival, and low relapse marks one of the milestones achieved over the decades. Foregoing poses a challenge for clinicians regarding optimal treatment, in which over- and under-treatment should be avoided. Classical prognostic and predictive factors fall short for individualized adjuvant therapy selection in this patient group. The key to better characterization may be found in the biology underlying individual tumors. We hypothesized that markers related to cellular proliferation and apoptosis and the balance between these two processes in tumor development will be predictive for clinical outcome. Our study population (N = 822) consisted of all early stage BC patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1996. Sections of available tumor tissue (87 %, 714/822) were immunohistochemically stained for expression of p53, active-caspase-3, and Ki67. In 43 % (304/714) and 18 % (126/714) of this cohort, respectively, a biochemical C2P(®) risk prediction and caspase-3 assay were performed. Expression data of the mentioned markers, single, or combined, were analyzed. Results showed that both the single and combined markers, whether of apoptotic or proliferative origin had associations with clinical outcome. An additive effect was seen for the hazard ratios when data on p53, active caspase-3, and Ki67 status were combined. The assembled prognostic apoptotic-proliferative subtype showed significant association for both the overall survival (p = 0.024) and relapse-free period (p = 0.001) in the multivariate analyses of grade I breast tumors. Combined markers of tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation represent tumor aggressiveness. The apoptotic-proliferative subtypes that we present in this study represent a clinical prognostic profile with solid underlying biological rationale and pose a promising method for accurate identification of grade I BC patients in need of an aggressive therapeutic approach, thus contributing to precision medicine in BC disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24194179     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2748-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

Review 1.  Harnessing benefit from targeting tumor associated carbohydrate antigens.

Authors:  Thomas Kieber-Emmons; Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Laura F Hutchins; Angela Pennisi; Issam Makhoul
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The role of human cervical cancer oncogene in cancer progression.

Authors:  Xin-Yu Li; Xin Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Pharmacological Development of Target-Specific Delocalized Lipophilic Cation-Functionalized Carboranes for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Eirini D Tseligka; Aikaterini Rova; Elsa P Amanatiadou; Gianpiero Calabrese; John Tsibouklis; Dimitrios G Fatouros; Ioannis S Vizirianakis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Expression of cleaved caspase-3 predicts good chemotherapy response but poor survival for patients with advanced primary triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodan Liu; Shenyi Jiang; Xin Tian; Youhong Jiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-09-01

5.  Radiobiological effects of wound fluid on breast cancer cell lines and human-derived tumor spheroids in 2D and microfluidic culture.

Authors:  Shabnam Jeibouei; Ali Hojat; Ebrahim Mostafavi; Amir Reza Aref; Alireza Kalbasi; Vahid Niazi; Mohammad Ajoudanian; Farzaneh Mohammadi; Fariba Saadati; Seyed Mohammadreza Javadi; Forough Shams; Maryam Moghaddam; Farshid Karami; Kazem Sharifi; Farid Moradian; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Hakimeh Zali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Identifying a highly-aggressive DCIS subgroup by studying intra-individual DCIS heterogeneity among invasive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Dana Pape-Zambito; Zhengyu Jiang; Hong Wu; Karthik Devarajan; Carolyn M Slater; Kathy Q Cai; Arthur Patchefsky; Mary B Daly; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  High nuclear expression levels of histone-modifying enzymes LSD1, HDAC2 and SIRT1 in tumor cells correlate with decreased survival and increased relapse in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Remco S Derr; Anneke Q van Hoesel; Anne Benard; Inès J Goossens-Beumer; Anita Sajet; N Geeske Dekker-Ensink; Esther M de Kruijf; Esther Bastiaannet; Vincent T H B M Smit; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Quantum dots-based quantitative and in situ multiple imaging on ki67 and cytokeratin to improve ki67 assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Ping Yuan; Lin Wei Wang; Ai Ping Qu; Jia Mei Chen; Qing Ming Xiang; Chuang Chen; Sheng-Rong Sun; Dai-Wen Pang; Juan Liu; Yan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Delphic consensus assessment: imaging and biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease management.

Authors:  Kjell Oberg; Eric Krenning; Anders Sundin; Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Margot Tesselaar; Valentina Ambrosini; Richard P Baum; Matthew Kulke; Marianne Pavel; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Ignat Drozdov; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Andrea Frilling; Robert Jensen; Klaus Koopmans; Tiny Korse; Dik Kwekkeboom; Helmut Maecke; Giovanni Paganelli; Ramon Salazar; Stefano Severi; Jonathan Strosberg; Vikas Prasad; Aldo Scarpa; Ashley Grossman; Annemeik Walenkamp; Mauro Cives; Irene Virgolini; Andreas Kjaer; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.335

10.  Immunological subtypes in breast cancer are prognostic for invasive ductal but not for invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Authors:  C C Engels; D B Y Fontein; P J K Kuppen; E M de Kruijf; V T H B M Smit; J W R Nortier; G J Liefers; C J H van de Velde; E Bastiaannet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.