Literature DB >> 24193581

Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations.

T M Glasby1, A J Underwood.   

Abstract

There is great inconsistency in the use of the terms 'pulse' and 'press' when describing types of perturbations. This is due primarily to a failure to distinguish between the cause and the effect of the perturbation in question. The cause and effect may be either short- or long-term and clearly one may be short-term and the other long-term. Distinction between these two types of disturbance is crucial for management to prevent further impact. Thus, it is important to describe separately these two aspects of a perturbation. Here, we define a protocol for sampling perturbations which enables the cause and effect to be distinguished between short- or long-term. Existing (i.e., already established) assemblages and newly-established assemblages are sampled and compared among disturbed and control locations. Existing assemblages may have been affected by past (pulse) disturbances and/or ongoing (press) disturbances, whereas the establishment of new assemblages can only be influenced by ongoing disturbances. We describe the procedures for assessing impacts of estuarine marinas as an illustration of the issues to be considered in any habitat. Settlement plates and defaunated sediment are suggested for sampling the establishment of new assemblages in aquatic environments.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24193581     DOI: 10.1007/BF00414371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Sewage and the biota on seashores: Assessment of impact in relation to natural variability.

Authors:  P G Fairweather
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

Authors:  J H Connell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Disturbance and organisms on boulders : I. Patterns in the environment and the community.

Authors:  K A McGuinness
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolor at Edithburgh, South Australia.

Authors:  Alice M Kay; Michael J Keough
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The evolution of the stress concept.

Authors:  H Selye
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.548

6.  Detecting the Ecological Effects of Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Kelp Forest Invertebrates.

Authors:  Stephen C Schroeter; John D Dixon; Jon Kastendiek; Richard O Smith; James R Bence
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.657

  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  Impacts of off-road vehicles (ORVs) on macrobenthic assemblages on sandy beaches.

Authors:  Thomas A Schlacher; Darren Richardson; Ian McLean
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Statistical power to detect change in a mangrove shoreline fish community adjacent to a nuclear power plant.

Authors:  T E Dolan; P D Lynch; J L Karazsia; J E Serafy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Recolonisation of translocated metal-contaminated sediments by estuarine macrobenthic assemblages.

Authors:  Anthony A Chariton; William A Maher; Anthony C Roach
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Temporal variability within disturbance events regulates their effects on natural communities.

Authors:  Jorge García Molinos; Ian Donohue
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Functional response of an adapted subtidal macrobenthic community to an oil spill: macrobenthic structure and bioturbation activity over time throughout an 18-month field experiment.

Authors:  Franck Gilbert; Georges Stora; Philippe Cuny
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Microbial Community Resilience across Ecosystems and Multiple Disturbances.

Authors:  Laurent Philippot; Bryan S Griffiths; Silke Langenheder
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Lake microbial communities are resilient after a whole-ecosystem disturbance.

Authors:  Ashley Shade; Jordan S Read; Nicholas D Youngblut; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight; Timothy K Kratz; Noah R Lottig; Eric E Roden; Emily H Stanley; Jesse Stombaugh; Rachel J Whitaker; Chin H Wu; Katherine D McMahon
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Host plant quality, spatial heterogeneity, and the stability of mite predator-prey dynamics.

Authors:  Matthew P Daugherty
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience.

Authors:  Ashley Shade; Hannes Peter; Steven D Allison; Didier L Baho; Mercè Berga; Helmut Bürgmann; David H Huber; Silke Langenheder; Jay T Lennon; Jennifer B H Martiny; Kristin L Matulich; Thomas M Schmidt; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  How much is too little to detect impacts? A case study of a nuclear power plant.

Authors:  Mariana Mayer-Pinto; Barbara L Ignacio; Maria T M Széchy; Mariana S Viana; Maria P Curbelo-Fernandez; Helena P Lavrado; Andrea O R Junqueira; Eduardo Vilanova; Sérgio H G Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.