PURPOSE: This exploratory study was aimed at elucidating the pharmacogenetics of regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR, CAR, RXRα and HNF4α) and their implications on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in local Chinese nasopharyngeal cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including tag-SNPs and functionally relevant SNPs of the genes encoding these regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR/NR1I2, CAR/NR1I3, RXRα/NR2B1 and HNF4α/NR2A1), were profiled in the patients enrolled in our study by direct sequencing (N = 50). The generalized linear model was employed to estimate the haplotypic effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the patients. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel in these patients were characterized by marked interindividual variability, with approximately four- to sixfold variations observed in Cmax, AUC0-∞ and CL. Individual SNP association tests revealed that polymorphisms in NR2B1 and NR2A1 were significantly correlated with altered docetaxel pharmacokinetics. Subsequent haplotype association analysis identified the NR2B1 LD block 2 AG haplotype [*+4458G>A(rs3132291) and *+4988A>G(rs4842198)] to be significantly associated with altered pharmacokinetics, in which patients carrying two copies of the AG haplotype had approximately a 20 % decreased Cmax and AUC0-∞ and a 21 % increased CL compared to those who carried only one copy or no copies of the haplotype. A number of SNPs in NR1I2, NR1I3, NR2B1 and NR2A1 were also associated with a significant decrease in blood counts from baseline. No haplotype was found to exert any effects on the pharmacodynamics parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present exploratory study identified several SNPs in the genes encoding regulatory nuclear receptors which may account for the interpatient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. These findings highlight the important role of regulatory nuclear receptors on the disposition of docetaxel.
PURPOSE: This exploratory study was aimed at elucidating the pharmacogenetics of regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR, CAR, RXRα and HNF4α) and their implications on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in local Chinese nasopharyngeal cancerpatients. METHODS: A total of 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including tag-SNPs and functionally relevant SNPs of the genes encoding these regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR/NR1I2, CAR/NR1I3, RXRα/NR2B1 and HNF4α/NR2A1), were profiled in the patients enrolled in our study by direct sequencing (N = 50). The generalized linear model was employed to estimate the haplotypic effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the patients. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel in these patients were characterized by marked interindividual variability, with approximately four- to sixfold variations observed in Cmax, AUC0-∞ and CL. Individual SNP association tests revealed that polymorphisms in NR2B1 and NR2A1 were significantly correlated with altered docetaxel pharmacokinetics. Subsequent haplotype association analysis identified the NR2B1 LD block 2 AG haplotype [*+4458G>A(rs3132291) and *+4988A>G(rs4842198)] to be significantly associated with altered pharmacokinetics, in which patients carrying two copies of the AG haplotype had approximately a 20 % decreased Cmax and AUC0-∞ and a 21 % increased CL compared to those who carried only one copy or no copies of the haplotype. A number of SNPs in NR1I2, NR1I3, NR2B1 and NR2A1 were also associated with a significant decrease in blood counts from baseline. No haplotype was found to exert any effects on the pharmacodynamics parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present exploratory study identified several SNPs in the genes encoding regulatory nuclear receptors which may account for the interpatient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. These findings highlight the important role of regulatory nuclear receptors on the disposition of docetaxel.
Authors: Tessa M Bosch; Alwin D R Huitema; Valerie D Doodeman; Robert Jansen; Els Witteveen; Wim M Smit; Rob L Jansen; Carla M van Herpen; Marcel Soesan; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Y Hor; S C Lee; C I Wong; Y W Lim; R C Lim; L Z Wang; L Fan; J Y Guo; H S Lee; B C Goh; T Tan Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: L B Moore; D J Parks; S A Jones; R K Bledsoe; T G Consler; J B Stimmel; B Goodwin; C Liddle; S G Blanchard; T M Willson; J L Collins; S A Kliewer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: S Chan; K Friedrichs; D Noel; T Pintér; S Van Belle; D Vorobiof; R Duarte; M Gil Gil; I Bodrogi; E Murray; L Yelle; G von Minckwitz; S Korec; P Simmonds; F Buzzi; R González Mancha; G Richardson; E Walpole; M Ronzoni; M Murawsky; M Alakl; A Riva; J Crown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark R Haussler; Carol A Haussler; Leonid Bartik; G Kerr Whitfield; Jui-Cheng Hsieh; Stephanie Slater; Peter W Jurutka Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Rommel G Tirona; Wooin Lee; Brenda F Leake; Lu-Bin Lan; Cynthia Brimer Cline; Vishal Lamba; Fereshteh Parviz; Stephen A Duncan; Yusuke Inoue; Frank J Gonzalez; Erin G Schuetz; Richard B Kim Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-01-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nicholas R Powell; Tyler Shugg; Reynold C Ly; Costantine Albany; Milan Radovich; Bryan P Schneider; Todd C Skaar Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 6.244