Literature DB >> 24193010

A comparison of methods for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Elizabeth C Young1, Martina M Owens, Idowu Adebiyi, Tina Bedenham, Rachel Butler, Jonathan Callaway, Treena Cranston, Charlene Crosby, Ian A Cree, Laura Dutton, Catherine Faulkes, Claire Faulkner, Emma Howard, Julia Knight, Yuanxue Huang, Louise Lavender, Lazarus P Lazarou, Hongxiang Liu, Debbie Mair, Antonio Milano, Stacey Sandell, Alison Skinner, Andrew Wallace, Maggie Williams, Vicky Spivey, John Goodall, Jonathan Frampton, Sian Ellard.   

Abstract

EGFR mutation testing of tumor samples is routinely performed to predict sensitivity to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. At least 9 different methodologies are employed in UK laboratories, and the aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of different methods for the detection of EGFR mutations. Participating laboratories were sent coded samples with varying mutation loads (from 0% to 15%) to be tested for the p.Leu858Arg (p.L858R) missense mutation and c.2235_2249del exon 19 deletion. The p.L858R mutation and deletions within exon 19 of the EGFR gene account for ∼90% of mutation-positive cases. The 11 laboratories used their standard testing method(s) and submitted 15 sets of results for the p.L858R samples and 10 for the exon 19 deletion. The p.Leu858Arg (p.L858R) mutation was detected at levels between 1% and 7.5% by Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplification refractory mutation system, and capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformation analysis. The c.2235_2249del mutation was detected at 1% to 5% by fragment size analysis, Sanger sequencing or real-time PCR. A mutation was detected in 24/25 (96%) of the samples tested which contained 5% mutated DNA. The 1% sensitivity claimed for commercial real-time PCR-targeted EGFR tests was achieved and our results show greater sensitivity for the Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing screening methods compared to the 10% to 20% detection levels cited on clinical diagnostic reports. We conclude that multiple methodologies are suitable for the detection of acquired EGFR mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24193010     DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e318294936c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol        ISSN: 1052-9551


  10 in total

1.  Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers: Indian Consensus Guidelines for Molecular Testing.

Authors:  Kumar Prabhash; Suresh H Advani; Ullas Batra; Bivas Biswas; Anuradha Chougule; Mithua Ghosh; Vamshi Krishna Muddu; T P Sahoo; Ashok K Vaid
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer by droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Drew F K Williamson; Sean R N Marris; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Jacqueline L Bruce; Cloud P Paweletz; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Lynette M Sholl; Fei Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pyrosequencing: applicability for studying DNA damage-induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  Irina G Minko; Lauriel F Earley; Kimberly E Larlee; Ying-Chih Lin; R Stephen Lloyd
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  KRAS mutation analysis by PCR: a comparison of two methods.

Authors:  Louise Bolton; Anne Reiman; Katie Lucas; Judith Timms; Ian A Cree
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Peter Charlton
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  [Detection of UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism Using Fragment Analysis].

Authors:  Ying Huang; Jian Su; Xiaosui Huang; Danxia Lu; Zhi Xie; Suqing Yang; Weibang Guo; Zhiyi Lv; Hongsui Wu; Xuchao Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Molecular profiling of lung cancer specimens and liquid biopsies using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eleonora Bonaparte; Chiara Pesenti; Laura Fontana; Rossella Falcone; Leda Paganini; Anna Marzorati; Stefano Ferrero; Mario Nosotti; Paolo Mendogni; Claudia Bareggi; Silvia Maria Sirchia; Silvia Tabano; Silvano Bosari; Monica Miozzo
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Clinical influence of switching companion diagnostic tests for EGFR-TKs from Therascreen to Cobas v2.

Authors:  Ken Uchibori; Natsuki Takano; Ryo Manabe; Ryosuke Tsugitomi; Shinsuke Ogusu; Takehiro Tozuka; Hiroaki Sakamoto; Hiroshi Yoshida; Yoshiaki Amino; Ryo Ariyasu; Satoru Kitazono; Noriko Yanagitani; Makoto Nishio
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Efficacy of bronchoscopic biopsy for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pei Zhu; Qingqing Pan; Mengzhao Wang; Wei Zhong; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Optimization of EGFR mutation detection by the fully-automated qPCR-based Idylla system on tumor tissue from patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Marius Ilie; Catherine Butori; Sandra Lassalle; Simon Heeke; Nicolas Piton; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Virginie Tanga; Kevin Washetine; Elodie Long-Mira; Priscilla Maitre; Nathalie Yazbeck; Olivier Bordone; Virginie Lespinet; Sylvie Leroy; Charlotte Cohen; Jérôme Mouroux; Charles Hugo Marquette; Véronique Hofman; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.