| Literature DB >> 24192424 |
Abdelrafie M Makhawi, Xiao-Bo Liu, Shu-Ran Yang, Qi-Yong Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles sinensis is a principal vector for Plasmodium vivax malaria in most parts of China. Understanding of genetic structure and genetic differentiation of the mosquito should contribute to the vector control and malaria elimination in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24192424 PMCID: PMC4228240 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Collection data of populations in China
| Hainan (HA) | Qiongzhong | July-August, 2011 | 09 | 19°05N, 109°83E |
| Henan (HE-N) | Yongcheng North | Nov., 2010 | 09 | 33°42N, 115°58E |
| (HE-S) | Yongcheng South | Oct., 2010 | 19 | 34°18N, 116°39E |
| Jiangxi (JX-N) | Nanchang | July 2011 | 15 | 28°68N, 115°89E |
| (JX -J) | Jingdezhen | August 2011 | 12 | 29°3N, 117°22E |
| Guangxi (GX) | Guilin | July, 2011 | 10 | 25°29N, 110°28E |
| Shanghai (SH) | Baoshan | August 2011 | 15 | 31°41N, 121°48E |
| Sichuan (SC-C) | Chengdu | August 2011 | 07 | 30°67N, 104°06E |
| (SC-N) | Nanchong | August 2011 | 17 | 33°94N, 106°02E |
| Yunnan (YN) | Gaoligong Mountain | September 2012 | 27 | 25°11N, 98°40E |
n = sample size.
Figure 1China map shows study sites.
Figure 2Haplotypes network of populations collected from China based on 729bp of mtDNA gene. The clusters from each other are differentiated by a single mutation step. The size of each observed ellipse indicates the proportion of the haplotype in populations, the ancestral (ANC) haplotype is rectangular. Small circle is an expected mutation. C = cluster.
Haplotypes and nucleotide diversity of populations collected from China
| HA | 28 | 9 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 6.19 | 0.0128 ± 0.003 | 0.015 |
| HE-N | 13 | 9 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 3.83 | 0.0053 ± 0.0007 | 0.007 |
| HE-S | 35 | 17 | 0.988 ± 0.02 | 6.56 | 0.009 ± 0.002 | 0.014 |
| JX-J | 27 | 12 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 6.53 | 0.009 ± 0.002 | 0.014 |
| JX-N | 25 | 15 | 1.00 ± 0.02 | 6.19 | 0.0086 ± 002 | 0.011 |
| GX | 13 | 8 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 3.64 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.006 |
| SC-C | 4 | 3 | 0.714 ± 0.13 | 2.00 | 0.0027 ± 0.0005 | 0.002 |
| SC-N | 26 | 11 | 0.882 ± 0.07 | 5.32 | 0.0073 ± 0.002 | 0.011 |
| SH | 29 | 14 | 0.991 ± 0.03 | 7.44 | 0.010 ± 0.002 | 0.013 |
| YN | 25 | 8 | 0.849 ± 0.04 | 9.16 | 0.013 ± 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Overall** | 71 | 84 | 0.981 ± 0.004 | 7.17 | 0.0098 ± 0.0007 | 0.02 |
Tajima’s D = Not significant for all, Fu & Li’s D & F were not significant for all except for overall**. S = number of segregating sites, H = number of haplotypes, K = Average number of nucleotide differences, Hd = Haplotypes diversity, π = Nucleotide diversity, SD = standard deviation, θ = Average number of mutation per sequence. For population abbreviations see Table 1.
Genetic differentiation and gene flow between populations of collected from China
| HA | | 3.75 | 42.43 | 13.76 | −25.35 | 2.22 | 2.04 | 5.34 | 23.1 | 42.33 |
| HE-N | 0.118 | - | 9.61 | 769.5 | 27.3 | 6.12 | 5.03 | 4.6 | 26.83 | 1.53 |
| HE-S | 0.012 | 0.05 | - | −78.93 | −47.46 | 2.05 | 1.75 | 3.25 | 55.64 | 3.93 |
| JX-J | 0.035 | 0.0007 | 0.006 | - | −18.54 | 3.16 | 2.81 | 4.33 | 22.32 | 3.1 |
| JX-N | −0.020 | 0.018 | 0.011 | −0.028 | - | 3.17 | 2.87 | 6.27 | −29.24 | 4.9 |
| GX | 0.184 | 0.076 | 0.196 | 0.137 | 0.136 | - | −10.34 | −49.76 | 4.79 | 1.12 |
| SC-C | 0.197 | 0.090 | 0.222 | 0.151 | 0.149 | −0.051 | - | −165.83 | 3.16 | 0.97 |
| SC-N | 0.085 | 0.098 | 0.133 | 0.104 | 0.074 | −0.010 | −0.003 | - | 7.91 | 1.95 |
| SH | 0.021 | 0.018 | −0.009 | −0.023 | −0.017 | 0.095 | 0.137 | 0.06 | - | 4.74 |
| YN | 0.011* | 0.246** | 0.113** | 0.139** | 0.093** | 0.309** | 0.341*** | 0.204** | 0.095** | - |
Significance of χ2 : * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. F = genetic differentiation between populations, Nm = gene flow. Numbers above diagonal are Nm, numbers below diagonal are F For population abbreviations see Table 1.
AMOVA results among three clustered populations collected from China
| I & II: | Among populations | 1 | 0.88 | 36.43 | | |
| | Within populations | 81 | 1.54 | 63.57 | ||
| I & III: | Among populations | 1 | 1.21 | 27.49 | | |
| | Within populations | 106 | 3.19 | 72.51 | ||
| II & III: | Among populations | 1 | 1.66 | 33.16 | | |
| | Within populations | 87 | 3.34 | 66.84 | ||
| Overall: | Among populations | 2 | 1.26 | 31.32 | | |
| Within populations | 137 | 2.76 | 68.68 |
d.f. = degree of freedom. Significance tests (1023 permutations).
Mismatch and neutrality tests results of three clustered populations collected from China
| | | | ||||||
| I | 51 | 27 | 0.005(0.11) | 0.033(0.17) | 0.005(0.16) | 0.033(0.17) | −1.3884 | −26.1251**** |
| II | 32 | 17 | 0.010(0.46) | 0.049(0.56) | 0.010(0.33) | 0.049(0.56) | −1.2669 | −11.0673**** |
| III | 57 | 50 | 0.016(0.29) | 0.009(0.72) | 0.016(0.2) | 0.009(0.72) | −0.5710 | −11.3590** |
| Overall | 140 | 84 | 0.011(0.29) | 0.031(0.23) | 0.011(0.23) | 0.031(0.48) | −1.0750 | −16.1840** |
N = sample size, S = Segregating sites, SSD = Sum of Squared deviation, Rag = Harpending's Raggedness index. Significance ** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0000, all = all samples together (Un-clustered). No Tajima’s D P-values are significant. Number in parentheses is P value.
Figure 3Correlation between average and geographic distance between collection sites for pairwise comparisons of populations.P = 0.301.
Figure 4Abundance of population clusters in Chinese provinces.