Literature DB >> 24191910

Differentiation between early rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy persons by conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

M B Axelsen1, B J Ejbjerg, M L Hetland, H Skjødt, O Majgaard, U B Lauridsen, K Hørslev-Petersen, M Boesen, O Kubassova, H Bliddal, M Østergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameter that best differentiates healthy persons and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to investigated responsiveness to treatment of various MRI parameters.
METHOD: Conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of the hand were performed once for 26 healthy persons, and before and after 6 and 12 months of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment for 14 early RA patients, using a 1.0-T MRI unit. One-slice DCE-MRI was analysed using Dynamika version 4.2. The number of enhancing voxels (Nvoxel), the initial rate of enhancement (IRE), the maximum enhancement (ME), ME×Nvoxel, and IRE×Nvoxel were calculated for wrist and 2nd-5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Conventional MR images were evaluated using the RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) synovitis score.
RESULTS: Using DCE-MRI, enhancement was demonstrated in 61.5% of healthy persons and in 91.7% of RA patients at baseline, with a median Nvoxel of 3 and 362, respectively. At baseline, all parameters were higher for patients than for healthy persons (all p ≤ 0.003). Only one patient had a baseline RAMRIS synovitis score below the 95th percentile of the healthy persons. The corresponding number of patients was 3 for Nvoxel, ME×Nvoxel and IRE×Nvoxel, and 10 for IRE and ME. The RAMRIS synovitis score and IRE showed the highest responsiveness, with a standardized response mean (SRM) of -1.00 and -0.88, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The RAMRIS synovitis scoring of conventional MRI, and to a lesser extent the one-slice DCE-MRI parameters of synovial volume, differentiated early RA patients and healthy persons. The decrease in RAMRIS synovitis score, Nvoxel, and IRE showed sensitivity to change during treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24191910     DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2013.824022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  8 in total

1.  Functional imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  James F Griffith
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-06

2.  Can the painDETECT Questionnaire score and MRI help predict treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for the Frederiksberg hospital's Rheumatoid Arthritis, pain assessment and Medical Evaluation (FRAME-cohort) study.

Authors:  Signe Rifbjerg-Madsen; Anton Wulf Christensen; Mikael Boesen; Robin Christensen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal; Else Marie Bartels; Henning Locht; Kirstine Amris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Perfusion in hand arthritis on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a randomized prospective study using MRI as a standard of reference.

Authors:  Sevtap Tugce Ulas; Kay Geert Hermann; Marcus R Makowski; Robert Biesen; Fabian Proft; Ralph Schilling; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Comparing the effects of tofacitinib, methotrexate and the combination, on bone marrow oedema, synovitis and bone erosion in methotrexate-naive, early active rheumatoid arthritis: results of an exploratory randomised MRI study incorporating semiquantitative and quantitative techniques.

Authors:  Philip G Conaghan; Mikkel Østergaard; Michael A Bowes; Chunying Wu; Thomas Fuerst; Désirée van der Heijde; Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos; Oscar Soto-Raices; Pawel Hrycaj; Zhiyong Xie; Richard Zhang; Bradley T Wyman; John D Bradley; Koshika Soma; Bethanie Wilkinson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Synovial volume vs synovial measurements from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI as measures of response in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A D Gait; R Hodgson; M J Parkes; C E Hutchinson; T W O'Neill; N Maricar; E J Marjanovic; T F Cootes; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in inflammatory rheumatoid diseases.

Authors:  Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Joanna Mróz; Monika Ostrowska; Brygida Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2016-10-05

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Charlotte M Nusman; Cristina Lavini; Robert Hemke; Matthan W A Caan; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Koert M Dolman; Marion A J van Rossum; J Merlijn van den Berg; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12

8.  Rheumatoid arthritis: what do MRI and ultrasound show.

Authors:  Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Lennart Jans; James Teh
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.