| Literature DB >> 24191175 |
Sara Garbarino1, Giacomo Caviglia, Massimo Brignone, Michela Massollo, Gianmario Sambuceti, Michele Piana.
Abstract
[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is one of the most utilized tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) applications in oncology. FDG-PET relies on higher glycolytic activity in tumors compared to normal structures as the basis of image contrast. As a glucose analog, FDG is transported into malignant cells which typically exhibit an increased radioactivity. However, different from glucose, FDG is not reabsorbed by the renal system and is excreted to the bladder. The present paper describes a novel computational method for the quantitative assessment of this excretion process. The method is based on a compartmental analysis of FDG-PET data in which the excretion process is explicitly accounted for by the bladder compartment and on the application of an ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm for the determination of the tracer coefficients describing the FDG transport effectiveness. The validation of this approach is performed by means of both synthetic data and real measurements acquired by a PET device for small animals (micro-PET). Possible oncological applications of the results are discussed in the final section.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24191175 PMCID: PMC3804351 DOI: 10.1155/2013/793142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1The compartmental model adopted in this paper.
Figure 2Simulated experiment with a full matrix A as in (4). Results obtained with the following ACO parameters: P = 13, Q = 7, q = 0.015, and ξ = 0.4 for 30 runs of the algorithm. (a) Red line represents C , green line represents C , and blue line represents the total measurement on kidneys. In black, the same data corrupted by Poisson noise. (b) Superimposition of synthetic data (white dots) and reconstructed confidence strips of concentrations.
Simulated values of tracer coefficients providing different cases for the matrix A; reconstructed average values and standard deviations over 30 runs of ACO (same random initialization guess) and over 30 runs of LM (30 different random initializations). Values under 10−3 are set to 0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| g. t. | 1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| ACO | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.02 |
| LM | 1.13 ± 1.04 | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.29 | 0.31 ± 0.26 |
|
| ||||||
| g. t. | 0.8 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| ACO | 0.88 ± 0.10 | 0 ± 0 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
| LM | 0.92 ± 0.71 | 0 ± 0 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.22 | 0.39 ± 0.25 | 0.19 ± 0.11 |
|
| ||||||
| g. t. | 0.6 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| ACO | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0 ± 0 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| LM | 0.64 ± 0.33 | 0.06 ± 0.08 | 0 ± 0 | 0.09 ± 0.12 | 0.36 ± 0.17 | 0.39 ± 0.21 |
|
| ||||||
| g. t. | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| ACO | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.03 |
| LM | 0.74 ± 0.36 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.17 ± 0.11 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.46 ± 0.31 |
In the first columns: g. t. stands for ground truth, u. t. for upper triangular, l. t. for lower triangular, and diag. for diagonal.
Figure 3Analysis of real data from one of the murine models. Results obtained with the following ACO parameters: P = 25, Q = 13, q = 0.0001, and ξ = 0.65 for 20 runs of ACO. (a) Red line represents C ; blue dots represent C + C while green dots represent C . (b) Superimposition of concentrations in the bladder (green) and in the kidneys (blue) computed by solving the forward problem where the tracer coefficients are reconstructed by ACO. The error bars are Poisson that correspond to the square root of the measured counts.
Results of the data analysis in the case of 5 murine models. Reconstructed average values and standard deviations over both ACO (30 runs over the same random initialization) and LM (30 different random initializations).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1ACO | 1.16 ± 0.39 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| 1LM | 1.32 ± 1.64 | 0.07 ± 0.11 | 0.05 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.62 | 0.17 ± 0.21 | 0.29 ± 0.22 |
|
| ||||||
| 2ACO | 0.93 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| 2LM | 1.16 ± 1.12 | 0.10 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.31 | 0.22 ± 0.17 | 0.20 ± 0.13 |
|
| ||||||
| 3ACO | 0.93 ± 0.13 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.04 |
| 3LM | 0.88 ± 1.01 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.19 | 0.18 ± 0.20 | 0.19 ± 0.14 |
|
| ||||||
| 4ACO | 1.19 ± 0.18 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.11 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.03 |
| 4LM | 1.11 ± 1.41 | 0.07 ± 0.09 | 0.02 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.39 | 0.27 ± 0.31 | 0.30 ± 0.23 |
|
| ||||||
| 5ACO | 1.11 ± 0.10 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| 5LM | 1.03 ± 1.31 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.29 | 0.33 ± 0.41 | 0.27 ± 0.19 |
In the first columns, 1ACO indicates the results concerning the first murine model provided by ACO and so on.
Figure 4Correlation between the average clearances 〈Cl〉 and rate coefficients k (from blood to preurine) for five healthy models.