Literature DB >> 24190164

Does microbial biomass affect pelagic ecosystem efficiency? An experimental study.

J D Wehr1, J Le, L Campbell.   

Abstract

Bacteria and other microorganisms in the pelagic zone participate in the recycling of organic matter and nutrients within the water column. The microbial loop is thought to enhance ecosystem efficiency through rapid recycling and reduced sinking rates, thus reducing the loss of nutrients contained in organisms remaining within the photic zone. We conducted experiments with lake communities in 5400-liter mesocosms, and measured the flux of materials and nutrients out of the water column. A factorial design manipulated 8 nutrient treatments: 4 phosphorus levels × 2 nitrogen levels. Total sedimentation rates were greatest in high-N mesocosms; within N-surplus communities, [Symbol: see text]1 µM P resulted in 50% increase in total particulate losses. P additions without added N had small effects on nutrient losses from the photic zone; +2 µM P tanks received 334 mg P per tank, yet after 14 days lost only 69 mg more particulate-P than did control communities. Nutrient treatments resulted in marked differences in phytoplankton biomass (twofold N effect, fivefold P effect in +N mesocosms only), bacterioplankton densities (twofold N-effect, twofold P effects in -N and +N mesocosms), and the relative importance of autotrophic picoplankton (maximum in high NY mesocosms). Multiple regression analysis found that of 8 plankton and water chemistry variables, the ratio of autotrophic picoplankton to total phytoplankton (measured as chlorophyll α) explained the largest portion of the total variation in sedimentation loss rates (65% of P-flux, 57% of N-flux, 26% of total flux). In each case, systems with greater relative importance of autotrophic picoplankton had significantly reduced loss rates. In contrast, greater numbers of planktonic bacteria were associated with increased sedimentation rates and lower system efficiency. We suggest that different microbial components may have contrasting effects on the presumed enhanced efficiency provided by the microbial loop.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24190164     DOI: 10.1007/BF00170110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  7 in total

1.  Experimental tests of nutrient limitation in freshwater picoplankton.

Authors:  J D Wehr
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of nutrients on specific growth rate of bacterioplankton in oligotrophic lake water cultures.

Authors:  M F Coveney; R G Wetzel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes.

Authors:  D W Schindler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Inorganic phosphorus stimulation of bacterioplankton production in a meso-eutrophic lake.

Authors:  T Toolan; J D Wehr; S Findlay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Positive feedback in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  L Stone; R S Weisburd
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Planktonic microbes: Tiny cells at the base of the ocean's food webs.

Authors:  E B Sherr; B F Sherr
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J E Hobbie; R J Daley; S Jasper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Strong indirect effects of a submersed aquatic macrophyte, Vallisneria americana, on bacterioplankton densities in a mesotrophic lake.

Authors:  A A Huss; J D Wehr
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 4.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.