INTRODUCTION: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. METHODS: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.
INTRODUCTION: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. METHODS: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.
Authors: Philipp Fassbender; Frank Herbstreit; Matthias Eikermann; Helmut Teschler; Jürgen Peters Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Jillian Nickerson; Euny Lee; Michael Nedelman; R Nisha Aurora; Ana Krieger; Carol R Horowitz Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Sushanth Bhat; Hinesh Upadhyay; Vincent A DeBari; Muhammad Ahmad; Peter G Polos; Sudhansu Chokroverty Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Vishesh K Kapur; Dennis H Auckley; Susmita Chowdhuri; David C Kuhlmann; Reena Mehra; Kannan Ramar; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 4.062