Literature DB >> 24188022

Influence of the redox indicator reaction on single-nanoparticle collisions at mercury- and bismuth-modified Pt ultramicroelectrodes.

Radhika Dasari1, Brandon Walther, Donald A Robinson, Keith J Stevenson.   

Abstract

Single-Pt nanoparticles (NPs) can be detected electrochemically by measuring the current-time (i-t) response associated with both hydrazine oxidation and proton reduction during individual Pt NP collisions with noncatalytic Hg- and Bi-modified Pt ultramicroelectrodes (Hg/Pt and Bi/Pt UMEs, respectively). At Hg/Pt UMEs, the i-t response for both hydrazine oxidation and proton reduction consists of repeated current "spikes" that return to the background level as Hg poisons the Pt NP after collision with the Hg/Pt UME due to amalgamation and deactivation of the redox reaction. Furthermore, at a Hg/Pt UME, the applied potential directly influences the interfacial surface tension (electrocapillarity) that also impacts the observed i-t response for single-Pt NP collisions for proton reduction that exhibits a faster decay of current (0.7-4 ms) to background levels than hydrazine oxidation (2-5 s). Because the surface tension of Hg is lower (-0.9 V), Pt NPs possibly react faster with Hg (amalgamate at a faster rate), resulting in sharp current spikes for proton reduction compared to hydrazine oxidation. In contrast, a stepwise "staircase" i-t response is observed for proton reduction for single-Pt NP collisions at a Bi/Pt UME. This different response suggests that electrostatic forces of negatively charged citrate-capped Pt NPs also influence the i-t response at more negative applied potentials, but the Pt NPs do not poison the electrochemical activity at Bi/Pt UMEs.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24188022     DOI: 10.1021/la402818g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  4 in total

1.  Single-Nanoparticle Electrochemistry through Immobilization and Collision.

Authors:  Todd J Anderson; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Voltammetry.

Authors:  Christopher Batchelor-McAuley; Enno Kätelhön; Edward O Barnes; Richard G Compton; Eduardo Laborda; Angela Molina
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.911

3.  Single Nanotube Voltammetry: Current Fluctuations Are Due to Physical Motion of the Nanotube.

Authors:  Hannah Hodson; Xiuting Li; Christopher Batchelor-McAuley; Lidong Shao; Richard G Compton
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Electrocatalytic amplification of DNA-modified nanoparticle collisions via enzymatic digestion.

Authors:  Alma D Castañeda; Donald A Robinson; Keith J Stevenson; Richard M Crooks
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.