Dear editorWe have read with great interest the study of Kim et al, recently published in the International Journal of Nanomedicine.1 The physicians from South Korea describe the anti-tumor efficacy of sorafenib in cholangiocarcinoma, a malignancy with a dismal prognosis and refractory to most chemotherapy options. Surgery is the only curative option, but is limited to only a small number of cases due to the late diagnosis.2 This emphasizes the need to develop new approaches for such cases and the first potential new option is the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, already proven to improve the therapeutic ratio of hepatocellular carcinoma, as according to Llovet et al.3 But unlike hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinomas are epithelial cancers with a highly developed desmoplastic stroma due to the interaction between the cancer cell and the cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), as well as the macrophages, and the natural killer (NK) cells.4 This tumor microenvironment makes it difficult for a chemotherapy drug to reach the cancer cell and be efficient, which partially explains the reason why Kim et al1 developed a sorafenib-coated stent, that can be placed inside the biliary tree and deliver the drug continuously.Sorafenib inhibits both the cancer cell proliferation and its neo-angiogenesis by inhibiting the receptor for tyrosine kinases and thus acting on the signaling pathways via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 and -3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-β, and mast/stem cell growth factor receptor. One of the first trials confirmed its efficacy in advanced, metastasized renal cell carcinoma, but only after immunotherapy with interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-alpha.5 This highlights the need for a combined therapy, that uses immunotherapy together with tyrosine kinase inhibitors to target not only the cancer cell, but also the cancer microenvironment. This is of very special importance, as these drugs may indeed affect the malignant cell, but they also disrupt the local cancer niche, as proven by the very recent paper of Zhang et al.6 The group stated that sorafenib may actually kill some of the cancer cells, but it also promotes the dissemination of the cancer due to its “off target” effects on the niche, especially on the NK cells. IL-2 activated NK cells will enhance the production of IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha,7 resulting in a boosted innate immune response against the cancer. In their excellent study, Zhang et al6 have proven that sorafenib directly affects the proliferation and function of NK cells by inhibiting the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) pathway. Even if this drug did not significantly change the number of CD4+/CD8+T lymphocytes, it affected both the initial cancer niche, as well as the pre-metastatic niche and thus it indirectly promoted the metastasis of the cancer cell to distant organs, such as the lungs.We have no reason to doubt the results of Kim et al1 and are confident that the data provided by these colleagues are of high importance for the management of patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma and are in accordance with international data. However, these studies were done using HuCC-T1 cells, a line of differentiated cancer cells. In our experience, we have proven that a liver malignancy also includes a small, sub-population of stem-like cells (CSC), responsible for resistance to chemotherapy, increased angiogenesis and finally, the clinical relapse of the patient.8 Sorafenib is no exception to this rule, as already proven by our research9,10 and not only affects the malignancy, but indirectly by helping promotion and dissemination, as CSCs have a higher potential for distant metastasis.A more holistic vision of cancer and its biology would take into consideration not only the actual cancer cell, but also its dynamics, as well as the interaction with the surrounding microenvironment. The solution might be the use of adjuvant immunotherapy along with new, targeted molecular therapy drugs for patients with unresectable disease in order to obtain long-term clinical remissions.
Authors: Joachim C Mertens; Christian D Fingas; John D Christensen; Rory L Smoot; Steven F Bronk; Nathan W Werneburg; Michael P Gustafson; Allan B Dietz; Lewis R Roberts; Alphonse E Sirica; Gregory J Gores Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hari Nathan; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; John L Cameron; Richard D Schulick Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-09-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Nathalie Lassau; Eric Angevin; Jean Charles Soria; Linda Chami; Michele Lamuraglia; Eric Zafarana; Veronique Landreau; Brian Schwartz; Eric Brendel; Jean-Pierre Armand; Caroline Robert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245