Literature DB >> 24187440

MEMS-based shear characterization of soft hydrated samples.

Gadryn C Higgs1,2, Chelsey S Simmons1,2, Yingning Gao1, Andrew Fried3, Sung-Jin Park1, Cindy Chung1,4, Beth L Pruitt1,2,5.   

Abstract

We have designed, fabricated, calibrated and tested actuators for shear characterization to assess microscale shear properties of soft substrates. Here we demonstrate characterization of dry silicone and hydrated polyethelyne glycol. Microscale tools, including atomic force microscopes and nanoindenters, often have limited functionality in hydrated environments. While electrostatic comb-drive actuators are particularly susceptible to moisture damage, through chemical vapor deposition of hexamethyldisiloxane, we increase the hydrophobicity of our electrostatic devices to a water contact angle 90 ± 3°. With this technique we determine the effective shear stiffness of both dry and hydrated samples for a range of soft substrates. Using computational and analytical models, we compare our empirically determined effective shear stiffness with existing characterization methods, rheology and nanoindentation, for samples with shear moduli ranging from 5-320 kPa. This work introduces a new approach for microscale assessment of synthetic materials that can be used on biological materials for basic and applied biomaterials research.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187440      PMCID: PMC3811110          DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/23/8/085001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Micromech Microeng        ISSN: 0960-1317            Impact factor:   1.881


  15 in total

1.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells.

Authors:  H B Wang; M Dembo; Y L Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 2.  Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J Milton Harris; Robert B Chess
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream.

Authors:  Theresa M Allen; Pieter R Cullis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Surface detection errors cause overestimation of the modulus in nanoindentation on soft materials.

Authors:  Jessica D Kaufman; Catherine M Klapperich
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-09-06

5.  Piezoresistive cantilever force-clamp system.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Park; Bryan C Petzold; Miriam B Goodman; Beth L Pruitt
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.523

6.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility.

Authors:  R J Pelham; Y l Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with atomic force microscope (AFM)-based indentation.

Authors:  M Balooch; I C Wu-Magidi; A Balazs; A S Lundkvist; S J Marshall; G W Marshall; W J Siekhaus; J H Kinney
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

8.  Spatial mapping of the biomechanical properties of the pericellular matrix of articular cartilage measured in situ via atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Eric M Darling; Rebecca E Wilusz; Michael P Bolognesi; Stefan Zauscher; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Matrix stiffness affects spontaneous contraction of cardiomyocytes cultured within a PEGylated fibrinogen biomaterial.

Authors:  Keren Shapira-Schweitzer; Dror Seliktar
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  MEMS Electrostatic Actuation in Conducting Biological Media.

Authors:  Vikram Mukundan; Beth L Pruitt
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.417

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  For whom the cells pull: Hydrogel and micropost devices for measuring traction forces.

Authors:  Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Aleksandra K Denisin; Robin E Wilson; Beth L Pruitt
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.608

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.