Literature DB >> 24187030

Biomechanical responses of aquatic plants to aerial conditions.

Elena Hamann1, Sara Puijalon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Wetlands are impacted by changes in hydrological regimes that can lead to periods of low water levels. During these periods, aquatic plants experience a drastic change in the mechanical conditions that they encounter, from low gravitational and tensile hydrodynamic forces when exposed to flow under aquatic conditions, to high gravitational and bending forces under terrestrial conditions. The objective of this study was to test the capacity of aquatic plants to produce self-supporting growth forms when growing under aerial conditions by assessing their resistance to terrestrial mechanical conditions and the associated morpho-anatomical changes.
METHODS: Plastic responses to aerial conditions were assessed by sampling Berula erecta, Hippuris vulgaris, Juncus articulatus, Lythrum salicaria, Mentha aquatica, Myosotis scorpioides, Nuphar lutea and Sparganium emersum under submerged and emergent conditions. The cross-sectional area and dry matter content (DMC) were measured in the plant organs that bear the mechanical forces, and their biomechanical properties in tension and bending were assessed. KEY
RESULTS: All of the species except for two had significantly higher stiffness in bending and thus an increased resistance to terrestrial mechanical conditions when growing under emergent conditions. This response was determined either by an increased allocation to strengthening tissues and thus a higher DMC, or by an increased cross-sectional area. These morpho-anatomical changes also resulted in increased strength and stiffness in tension.
CONCLUSIONS: The capacity of the studied species to colonize this fluctuating environment can be accounted for by a high degree of phenotypic plasticity in response to emersion. Further investigation is however needed to disentangle the finer mechanisms behind these responses (e.g. allometric relations, tissue make-up), their costs and adaptive value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phenotypic plasticity; aquatic herbaceous plants; biomechanics; mechanical stress; stiffness; strength

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187030      PMCID: PMC3838548          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  12 in total

Review 1.  The influence of gravity and wind on land plant evolution.

Authors:  K J Niklas
Journal:  Rev Palaeobot Palynol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.940

Review 2.  Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation.

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci; Courtney J Murren; Carl D Schlichting
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Phenotypic plasticity in response to mechanical stress: hydrodynamic performance and fitness of four aquatic plant species.

Authors:  Sara Puijalon; Jean-Paul Léna; Nicolas Rivière; Jean-Yves Champagne; Jean-Claude Rostan; Gudrun Bornette
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 4.  Functional adaptation and phenotypic plasticity at the cellular and whole plant level.

Authors:  Karl J Niklas
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Allometric theory and the mechanical stability of large trees: proof and conjecture.

Authors:  Karl J Niklas; Hanns-Christof Spatz
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Differences in mechanical and structural properties of surface and aerial petioles of the aquatic plant Nymphaea odorata subsp. tuberosa (Nymphaeaceae).

Authors:  Shelley A Etnier; Philip J Villani
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance-tolerance trade-off.

Authors:  Sara Puijalon; Tjeerd J Bouma; Christophe J Douady; Jan van Groenendael; Niels P R Anten; Evelyne Martel; Gudrun Bornette
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  F W Penning de Vries; A H Brunsting; H H van Laar
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Size and shape in biology.

Authors:  T McMahon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth, and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants.

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Raquel Casado-Garcia; Hisae Nagashima
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical response of a submerged, rosette-forming macrophyte to wave action in a eutrophic lake on the Yungui Plateau, China.

Authors:  Guorong Zhu; Guilan Di; Meng Zhang; Te Cao; Leyi Ni; Rongting Fang; Gongliang Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of wind waves versus ship waves on tidal marsh plants: a flume study on different life stages of Scirpus maritimus.

Authors:  Alexandra Silinski; Maike Heuner; Jonas Schoelynck; Sara Puijalon; Uwe Schröder; Elmar Fuchs; Peter Troch; Tjeerd J Bouma; Patrick Meire; Stijn Temmerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Thigmomorphogenetic responses of an aquatic macrophyte to hydrodynamic stress.

Authors:  Jonas Schoelynck; Sara Puijalon; Patrick Meire; Eric Struyf
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  The transformation of macrophyte-derived organic matter to methane relates to plant water and nutrient contents.

Authors:  Charlotte Grasset; Gwenaël Abril; Raquel Mendonça; Fabio Roland; Sebastian Sobek
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.745

5.  In Vitro Morphogenesis of Arabidopsis to Search for Novel Endophytic Fungi Modulating Plant Growth.

Authors:  Francesco Dovana; Marco Mucciarelli; Maurizio Mascarello; Anna Fusconi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.